Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetorical strategies present in george w bush presidents speech to the nation
President ronald reagan, speech in berlin
Reagan’s speech at the Brandenburg Gate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
On June 12, 1987 in front of a West German crowd, President Ronald Reagan gave a speech about a the Berlin Wall that divides a once unified country of Germany to East and West. Explosives and barbed-wire fence on the fence that dangers the citizens on each side of the wall to keep the Western “fascists” from entering East Germany and undermining the socialist state. During the speech Reagan utilizes many rhetorical strategies including diction and pathos. Reagan uses extraordinary diction in the speech to connect to the crowd.At the beginning of the speech he addresses “Chancellor Kohl”, “Governing Mayor Diepgen”, and the “ladies and gentlemen” listening to his speech. Which lets a personal connection to the listeners of the speech and making him seem trust worthy. He comes out to the and references him and his predecessors before him about why they are here by saying “We come to Berlin, we American presidents, because it's our duty to speak, in this place, of freedom.” He also makes a connection with the German crowd by speaking a phrases in the German language. He says in German “You see, like so many presidents before me, I come here today because wherever I go, whatever I do Ich hab noch einen Koffer in Berlin.” , which means in english “I still have a suitcase in Berlin”. He also saysing German “Es gibt nur ein Berlin.", which means there is only one Berlin. Reagan attempts to talk as if he was an German citizen and not a President of a powerful and influential country. He does not want to be recognized and as a president, and it would be better if he was not recognized as that in the East German citizens eyes. The words he choose to use makes the crowd feel like President Reagan was their friend. If he did not do this, the... ... middle of paper ... ...nd is a turning point in the speech. When Reagan says “Tear down this wall!” he challenges Gorbachev to do what he should do. He also thinks if its Gorbachev policy, that he should do what he said he would do to show that he mens what he says. Now it is up to General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev to act on President Reagan’s challenge. Reagan within the speech uses hope for a new government to get the emotion out of the crowd. Signifying that the Berlin wall is an obstruction of freedom he say “Yes, across Europe, this wall will fall. For it cannot withstand faith; it cannot withstand truth. The wall cannot withstand freedom.” Using pathos within his speech made his speech more appealing to listen too and comprehend. President Reagan infasized what the will bring freedom to a country and what could prevent freedom, liberty, and democracy from happening in a country.
Throughout Reagan's speech, he used or rather talked about the issues that plague society today, such as combat, parenting, medicine/clinics and things of that nature. By him mentioning or hinting at these issues and using these relevant issues at hand it caused his audience to reflect on his speech as well as the so called prevalent "evil" that exists in today's world.
In the second paragraph he says, “We come to Berlin, we American Presidents, because it’s our duty to speak in this place of freedom.” By assigning speaking in places of freedom to his duties and allocating the cause for prosperity of the western world to freedom, Reagan establishes his ethos as an advocate for “good.” He continues to gain the trust of his audience by displaying his personal concern for the well-being of those in Berlin, in Germany, and in the western world as well as his sympathy for those that reside in the totalitarian state. By revealing his intentions to promote prosperity, Reagan creates a common goal between him and his audience, demonstrating his sincerity and honesty and allowing the rest of the text to be easily
But the battle to control Berlin between, the United States and the Soviet Union, had been taking place since after the division of Germany. The German Democratic Republic wanted better control over its people to spread its communist ideas and tried taking its way around to get control of East Berlin by building the Berlin Wall. The creation of this “concentration camp” on a much larger scale, gave the GDR total control over the people. The reasoning that the German Democratic Republic provided for the creation of this gigantic wall was that many of its skilled labor were leaving to the “free land” or the West, causing an economic downfall in the East.
He asks a question in his speech, “Can we solve the problems confronting us?” and then shortly after he answers, “Well, the answer is an unequivocal and emphatic, yes.” expressing the power of America by using great word choice. By using the words unequivocal and emphatic we see that Reagan is confident in America and his people. After stating the above, later on in his speech he says, “I do not believe in a fate that will fall on us no matter what we do. I do believe in a fate that will fall on us if we do nothing.” showing us Americans must work hard. Ronald Reagan clearly does not think making America great will just happen, he believes that people must work hard to achieve greatness. Reagan also says, “With the idealism and fair play… we can have a strong and prosperous America…” allowing us to see that greatness is there we just have to work for it.
Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” (Reagan 361) This line, while so simple, is probably the most famous from the whole speech and arguably one of Ronald Reagan 's most famous and recognizable lines ever. It sends a glaringly strong message that the United States and entire free world wants to bring Germany together not just for its own personal interests but because it genuinely cares about the state of the country. This short concise statement also shows that the president means business and that he is willing to do anything in his power to help the German people should Gorbachev accept his offer. He goes on to state that the United States is striving for peace and although it can not permit the spreading of communism, it does seek for all the people to see an increase in the standard of living and assure both sides security by demilitarizing and disarming both sides wherever
Ronald Reagan's BRandenburg Gate Address was not only Reagan's first trip to Berlin as president but a speech that went through every heart and mind in Berlin, Germany. Throughout most of the speech Reagan is talking about the Berlin wall that for over 2 decade separated the communist East germany from the free west germany. In August 1961 during the Cold War, East Germany built a 100 mile long wall separating the soviet union part of Berlin from the UN part of Berlin. Berlin was originally all part of the soviet Union because of the separation of Germany it self, but it was agreed to share Berlin. The soviet Union did not want the West Germany’s fascist ways to get in the way of their communist government. On August 15, 1961 East Germany was no longer allowed to go into West Germany for food, work, or even shopping.
The audience he was trying to directly get to was the people he understood were listening to it in the East. He also states, “I address my remarks to you just as surely as to those standing here before me.” To follow up with his statement of intended audience, Reagan says a powerful statement. A statement that is intended to the entirety of the audience. “For I join you, as I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this firm, this unalterable belief: Es gibt nur ein Berlin.” The final sentence meaning “There is only one Berlin.” This is yet another instance in this rhetorical masterpiece that Reagan clearly states his objective of the speech, to unify
This speech “Tear down That Wall” written by Peter Robinson, focuses on Ronald Reagan’s speech to the Soviet Union on tearing down the wall which is the barrier to East and West Germany. The author believes that tearing down the wall would be the end of two different political philosophies. As the Great Wall of China, the Berlin wall divides people who love and hate each other and also provides “protection”. It's going to be hard to tear this wall down because people are so used to the division and when the residents are joined together you don’t know what could happen. Such as the reading Pyramus and Thisbe the wall could be a form of protection from one and another. You can’t think of a physical or social wall as something
The end of World War II was the beginning of the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States. The Soviet Union had control over East Berlin, which was governed by a communist government and the United States had control over West Berlin, which was regulated by a democratic government. Both countries wanted full control over Berlin, so the Soviet Union set up a blockade on the West but was unsuccessful. The Berlin Wall was then built to stabilize the economy of East Berlin, which meant that fewer people could escape the east to live in the west. In the article “The fall of the Berlin Wall: what it meant to be there,” by Timothy Garton Ash, he highlights the feelings of no longer having a “iron curtain” segregating both sides of Berlin.
... through his repetition as well when he states “if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization”, along with repeating “Mr. Gorbachev” to add more sincerity to his speech (Reagan). Both uses of repetition by both presidents gave clear emphasis on the point they were addressing, the point that East and West Berlin should be joined once again and free from the wall of concrete that separates so many. It also gave both presidents credibility to the citizens of Berlin, in that they understood the exact troubles that these people were struggling with and the only way to solve them is to bring unity and freedom to East and West Berlin.
In the last fifty years the German Democratic Republic has been a nonstop changing country. In Germany, the terms “East” and “West” do not just represent geographically regions. It runs much deeper than that, and there is still a large gap in the way of life, and political and social conditions of the whole country. While most German’s were sleeping on the night of August 13, 1961, the East German government began closing its borders. In the early morning of that Sunday, most of the first work was done: the border to West Berlin was closed. The East German troops had begun to tear up streets and to install barbed wire entanglement and fences through Berlin. Between 1961 and today, the Berlin Wall saw many changes, and so did the people that it entrapped.
The Berlin Crisis reached its height in the fall of 1961. Between August and October of that year, the world watched as the United States and the Soviet Union faced off across a new Cold War barrier, the Berlin Wall. In some ways, the Wall was Khrushchev’s response to Kennedy’s conventional buildup at the end of July, and there were some in the West who saw it that way. However, as Hope Harrison has clearly shown, Khrushchev was not the dominant actor in the decision to raise the Wall, but rather acquiesced to pressure from East German leader Walter Ulbricht, who regarded the Wall as the first step to resolving East Germany’s political and economic difficulties. The most pressing of these difficulties was the refugee problem, which was at its height in the summer of 1961 as thousands of East Germans reacted to the increased tensions by fleeing westward. But Ulbricht also saw the Wall as a way to assert East German primacy in Berlin, and thus as a way to increase the pressure on the West to accept East German sovereignty over all of Berlin.
Another way Reagan uses emotional appeals in his speech at the Brandenburg Gate is through the reoccurring theme of good versus evil. The basic idea behind this theme is that America and other Western nations are good and right, while the Soviet Union is evil and wrong. However, unlike his speech to the National Association of Evangelicals in 1983, President Reagan does not come out and blatantly say that the Soviet Union is an “evil empire”. Instead, he gives examples that serve to prove his point without explicitly making any risky statements. To expand on this idea, President Reagan explains how America is good by showing the good things that the American government has done for Europe. This is seen clearly through the example of Reagan talking about the Marshal Plan. Reagan starts by
The collapse of the Berlin Wall changed Western Europe as we know it today. The Iron Curtain which had split Europe had ascended and the once divided germans were reunited under one common nation. The causal factors which resulted in the fall of the Berlin Wall were internal — communism imploded upon itself—. Gorbachev attempted to reform communism through Glasnost and Perestroika, which were supposed to incorporate economic reforms and transparency, however, history illustrates that increased liberty is incompatible with communism. Dr. Schmidtke argued that structural deficiencies led along with poor economic growth which led to the collapse of communism in Europe, and consequently the collapse of the Berlin Wall. The alienation of intellectuals and the authoritative nature of communist regimes further contributed to the failure of communism in Europe. However, the collapse of the Berlin Wall would not have occurred had it not been for Gorbachev’s Glasnost, Perestroika, and the end of the Brezhnev Doctrine. Along with German official Schabowski whose actions were the catalyst for the mass exodus of persons from the GDR into West Germany. The Collapse of the Berlin Wall would not have occurred so swiftly had Gorbachev not tried to implement reforms to communism.
When the Berlin Wall was constructed, East Germany went into a state of panic, fell into poverty, and adopted a communist government. The citizens of the GDR were filled with terror and anxiety when the border separating them from friends, family, and lovers was constructed. Many attempted to escape but every passing day, the wall became more and more menacing. Trapped, the people of East Germany were forced to cope with the shortage of goods, accept the fact that anybody could be a spy for the STASI, and follow the rule of an oppressive government. Although conditions were grim, the people of the East united together in order to survive. The wall is but a thing of the past, but it will always be remembered by every individual in Germany and the rest of the world.