A study came out recently that revealed that each time one remembers an event in their life, the memory of that event is replaced with the most recent memory of that event. Thus, the more you return to a memory, the more distorted it becomes, until gradually you lose factual parts of your own experiences to imaginings of what they once were. A pretty monumental study, really, when you think about how often our justice system depends on the accurate memories of witnesses, to be recounted over and over again. If a case goes on too long, a witness can actually replace a memory of a crime scene with a false one. Convince themselves something actually has, or hasn’t, happened.
But to me, the consequences of remembrance lie more commonly in the idea that one loses their own childhood in proportion to the amount of times they try to grasp at it. The second you try to hold water in your hands, the more quickly it seems to run through your fingers.
I was reading about 90’s Disney video tape sales for a seminar I’m taking, and was taken off-guard by the sheer amount of Disney classics released on VHS in the year 1996. I was four years old.
As I scanned those dates, it dawned on me that I was born into the technology war between VHS and Betamax. Home video was a titan rising in the information age and ’95 was the year that Daddy finally admitted Sony’s defeat, seven years after RCA had officially squashed Beta’s valiant effort for quality over quantity. Hell, I still remember the laserdisc player on the old wooden television set in the living room, now gathering dust in the 2nd shed—the one with the flower boxes. We had some Star Trek movies on Betatape. Once upon a time.
Like most young fathers, Daddy sought out the latest technological adv...
... middle of paper ...
...ughter Kelley fail time and time again to pin the nose on the snowman.
Even in our youngest moments, we were underdogs in a cruel world fighting for our purpose in the universe. Daddy always wanted to raise strong girls.
Years have passed, but my memory of that day has faded from crawling about on the yellowing kitchen floor under the supervision of my mother to viewing my frustrated sister struggle beyond the tempered glass of the Middletown house on Caroline Avenue. My Christmases, my birthdays, the blizzards and the snow days have been replaced with accounts from my parents’ film collection.
Often in my day to day activities I find myself narrating my ironic struggle through the most menial tasks, or blogging about the greater significance of my cable coiling or my perception of a song, and think to myself
And the grand tale continues, in the Epic… of the Snowman!
In Laurence Armand French Ph.D. and Thomas J. Young Ph.D.’s article The False Memory Syndrome: Clinical/Legal Issues for the Prosecution talks about memory recall being an unreliable form of evidence in the Criminal Justice System. French and Young state that hypnosis and lie detector tests are a misconception because “the cognitive interpretations of the emotional/autonomic aspects of the central nervous (CNS) and peripheral nervous systems are not true indicators of reality,” (p. 38).
The false memory and recovered memory literature is marked by controversy. It examines the phenomenon a variety of patients have exhibited: purportedly “losing” memories of trauma, only to recover them later in life (Gavlick, 2001). In these cases, temporary memory loss is attributed to psychological causes (i.e. a traumatic event) rather than known damage to the brain (Gavlick, 2001). While some assert that the creation of false memories through therapeutic practice is a serious concern and founded associations like the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (FMSF) in the U.S. and the British False Memory Society (BFMS) in order to advocate against psychological malpractice, other researchers contend that the evidence for “false memory syndrome,” or the recovery of untrue memories, is weak (Brewin & Andrews, 1998; Pope, 1996). The debate arose largely in the 1990s, though a consensus in the literature still has not been reached.
Steffens, M., & Mecklenbräuker, S. (2007). False memories: Phenomena, theories, and implications. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal Of Psychology, 215(1), 12-24. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.215.1.12
...These specifics recalled consist of things which, under normal conditions, we probably would not have ever remembered. The number of detailed facts retained about a particular situation is usually commensurate to the intensity of involvement or proximity to the action in question; therefore, it can be reasonably concluded that while these memories are not always perfectly engrained into our minds, interesting arguments exist which support the possibility of substantial and long-term recall of these matters.
Imagine having a memory of a very traumatic event resurface in your mind after forgetting about it for twenty years. That is what happened to Eileen Franklin in 1989 when she had recovered what is called a repressed memory of her father, George Franklin, killing her friend in 1969, which eventually lead to her father getting a sentence of life in prison (Beaver, 1996). A repressed memory is a memory that is not forgotten, but is a memory of something traumatic that is blocked and not recovered unless triggered by something. Although her descriptions of the event were very vivid, describing colors and sounds, most of what she described could be proven inaccurate. Some of what she described was information that was misreported in newspapers that she had probably read or been told about in the past. This is an example of the misinformation effect. Misinformation effect is when someone is misled by information about an event that they witnessed and has an effect on how they remember that event later. This is just one example of how the misinformation effect can change how an event is described.
For instance, I had a trip to San Francisco’s Angel Island when I was in high school. I visited the Angel Island immigration station, which is a former processing center for immigrants entering the United States. In the building, there are rooms with sets of bunk beds. I saw things that immigrants used before and read the poems that they wrote on the wall. There are yards and activity rooms inside the building for the immigrants. It is a nice building with a beautiful environment. Based on what I saw, I used to believe that Angel Island is a nice place for immigrants to stay before their immigration status was processed. Later, when I searched online about the immigration station, I found out that Angel Island was almost like a prison for the immigrants. Immigrants were not allowed to move freely in the building. There were many restrictions and harsh treatments to the immigrants. When I think about the Angel Island now, I view it as a horrible place for former immigrants despite the beautiful environment I saw. Even though the memory of the actual observation may be remembered correctly, we tend to distort our memory with the given suggested information. External factors can affect our credibility to our own memory and thus make the memory to become
Although testimony by witnesses is an invaluable tool in assisting judges and juries’ efforts to convict violent criminals, however, there are major issues with witness memory and recall of events. For this reason, officers of the court use the professional psychological research to deal with the likelihood of significant errors in eyewitness testimony. The fact is, human memory begins to fade within the first hour. In addition, memory continues to decrease for the next nine hours and beyond. Furthermore, recall of a crime can be affected by other factors. As a consequence of major mistakes in observer evidence many innocent victims spend years in prison before they are vindicated and
The term that best explains the barriers to eyewitness memory is widely regarded as verbal overshadowing. The notion of verbal overshadowing has been coined as the inability to provide explicit memories due to the cognitive barriers people possess to depict accurately the events that have transpired. On a daily basis, individuals across the United States are sentenced to lengthy prison sentences resultant of wrongful convictions (Innocence Project, 2016). To illustrate the ambivalences caused by verbal overshadowing, if it even exists, behavioral scientists conducted a study to demonstrate the disparities. Many researchers have designed an experiment to measure a person’s cognitive ability to remember accurately a perpetrator that has committed a crime in a police lineup (Schooler & Engstler-Schooler,
False memories can be formed in many ways. Prior knowledge has been proven to impact perception. A study done by Hastorf and Cantril in 1954 explains this. They had two groups watch a game versus Princeton and Dartmouth and had participants count penalties. On average, the Dartmouth fans counted an equal amount of penalties while the Princeton fans claimed that Dartmouth had twice as many penalties. These results are consistent with a previous conception that Dartmouth fans thought the game was rough but reasonable and the Princeton fans had a previous conception that Dartmouth plays unreasonable (Hunt, 2004). People perceive and encode events differently, so stored memories can be influenced by intervening events and conditions during retrieval can lead to false memories (Roediger, 2002).
Research has shown that even though information may be committed to memory, what is retrieved can be altered during the encoding process. It has been said that, “the recollection of memory can be manipulated and or large aspects of the event can be confabulated.” (Cain,1997). Moreover, the recollection of past experiences can negatively affect future decisions, opinions, and more significant outcomes such as an eyewitness. This type of impact is due to something called, “false memories.” False memories can be defined as “an recollection of an event that never actually occurred.” False memories are said to be normal occurrences and have little impact on lives. However, Loftus and Palmer argue something different. In 1974, Loftus and Palmer conducted an experiment to test out the theory behind “false memories.” Their aim was to show that language used in eyewitness testimony can alter memory. People in this experiment were asked to estimate the speed of motor vehicles using different ways of questioning. Loftus and Palmer asked questions in regards to vehicle speed because typically that is something that most people are bad at estimating. Therefore these people would be more vulnerable and open to suggestions. The procedure of this experiment involved participants watching a video of cars. Participants were asked what they had seen in regards to how that car came in contact with the other car. Loftus and Palmer used words like “crashed, collided, hit, and smashed.” Their findings concluded that the estimated speed was affected by the verb used to describe the cars’ contact with one another. It seem as if participants saw that the verbs as clues of the speed the cars were going. Loftus and Palmer also came to the conclusion that there could only be two reasons for their findings. Those reasons were Response- bias factors or the fact that the memory representation is alter.
Loftus’s work and the studies that followed have demonstrated that an individual’s memory of an event can easily be distorted by post-event information, which is provided through questions that the researcher or police officer in case of a real life crime might ask the witness. But not only researchers’ questions have been found to distort memory. Several studies have indicated that when witnesses discuss an event together they can mistakenly incorporate elements of each other’s memories into their own memories (e.g., Gabbert, Memon, & Allan, 2003; Paterson & Kemp, 2006). ...
One of the most interesting phenomenon related to memory is memory distortions. One way in which they occur is through suggestibility, where people begin to remember false experiences if researchers suggested to them that they experienced it (Sternberg and Sternberg, 2012). In real-life situations, this is caused in part by memory being constructive “in that prior experiences affects how we recall things and what we actually recall from memory” (Sternberg and Sternberg, 2012). People’s prior experiences, including their bias and expectations, may influence how they experience false memory formations; the formation of false memories is also affected by several possible factors, one of which may be sleep deprivation (Frenda, Patihis, Loftus,
In recent years there has been a hot debate between "repressed" vs. "false" memories. Neurobiological studies show that both suppression and recall and the creation of false memories are possible. This paper evaluates the evidence but forth by both sides of the controversy and concludes that both are feasible and separate phenomenon, which occur at significant rates in our society.
An alternative view to this debate, are from practicing therapist who argue that most recovered memories are true, and that there is still some evidence to support the concept of repressed memories (Briere & Conte, 1993). They claim that traumatic memories such as sexual abuse tend to be different from ordinary memories because they are encoded in a way that prevents them from being accessible in everyday life. In addition, they argue that certain procedures during therapy are necessary in order to bring the repressed memories back into conscious awareness, and this is deemed necessary in order to help the patient recover. Despite these claims, there is little evidence to support the validity of reported cases of recovered memories, and most of the theories are mainly based on speculation rather than scientific evidence. However, there have been some cases in which a recovered memory did corresponded to an actual event that occurred. For example, an article by Freyd (1999), reported a case in which a man called Frank Fitzpatrick recovered memories of sexual abuse from childhood. Although this
Loftus has focused the bulk of her career on both the psychological and legal aspects of distorted or false memories, and her work demonstrates the facility with which memories and beliefs can be molded. Her findings regarding the strength of eyewitness testimony and repressed traumatic memories have helped change the notion that such testimony is absolutely reliable (Zagorski, N., 2005).”