ff

883 Words2 Pages

Conceptualize the notion of being situated into the midst of a furious battle, one that will last for three long days. Killer Angels, by Michael Shaara, embellishes the reader with great detail of the Battle of Gettysburg. The novel reveals the events that occured during the battle in the Civil War by using pivotal keys points from both the Union and Confederate sides to display the true brutality of war. Along with highlighting the key aspects of war, Shaara also uses the characters to display the tides of friendship and how war can affect those so-called friendships. This book also emphasizes the idea that the generals in the war were normal people too, not the bleak and war-torn generals that are portrayed in our textbooks. Both sides saw justification in their actions, and they thought that their perspective of the war was just, and as a result, both the Union and Confederates were unable to accept responsibility. The pain and suffering of the countless men that are shown throughout the novel exemplifies the brutality of war. At the battle of Little Round Top, Chamberlain saw a wounded soldier. "...saw a man lying dead, whose face was shot away. He grimaced and then turned away. Half the right hawbone visible, about the bloody leer: face of one the Second Maine prisoners who had volunteered just a few moments past " (218). After the Twentieth Maine had moved closer to the heart of the war, the sights of the gruesome and horrific scenes became more commonplace. "There were guns were firing...as a bloody horse ran by, three-legged...Another horse was down with no head, as if it were an old toy" (310). Although these were focused solely on the pain that it caused Chamberlain, the generals on both sides were affected just as muc... ... middle of paper ... ...of these men were brilliant, and as a result, both were able to justify their resolves with valid reason. It is explained in the book that they were both moral men that were really kind to their families. Having said this, it raises the question of what are morals? Morals are reasons and explanations of what we preceive as right and wrong from our perspective. Because it's based on our experiences, it is rather hard to discern what is right and wrong from someone else's perspective, and because of this, it is not conventional to think that both sides were either wrong or right. They're both different, just like oranges and apples. Although there are obvious similarities and differences, they're two different things. When morals start to become a debate over philosophy is to be considered in what is right and what is wrong, the subject of the matter becomes objective.

Open Document