Procedural History Defendant, Alfredo Orozco-Santillan, was convicted in a California District Court on three counts of threatening to assault a federal law enforcement officer; he appealed and the lower court’s decision was affirmed by the Appellate Court. Facts On June 17, 1987, defendant Alfredo Orozco-Santillan, was arrested and booked on immigration charges by Immigration Naturalization Service’s Agent, Daniel Vela. During his arrest, again at his booking, and in two subsequent phone calls made by the defendant to Vela, defendant threatened to “kick [Vela’s] fucking ass” and that he would “pay for what he did”; referring to subjecting the defendant to a deportation hearing. On August 5, 1987 defendant’s neighbor was arrested. In a phone call made by the defendant to Agent Vela on August 6, 1987, defendant identified himself and said “Somebody is going to die”. The defendant referenced his neighbor (Vidal) and said that Agent Vela “better let him go”. Agent Vela was fearful that someone was going to kill him based on the threats; the defendant was arrested on August 11, 1987. At...
On the evening of January 5, 1993, Tracie Reeves and Molly Coffman, both twelve years of age and students at West Carroll Middle School, spoke on the telephone and decided to kill their homeroom teacher, Janice Geiger. They agreed that Coffman would bring rat poison to school the following days so that it could be placed in Geiger's drink. After that , they would steal Geiger's car and drive to the Smoky Mountains. On the morning of January 6, Coffman placed a packet of rat poison in her purse and board the school bus. Coffman told another student, Christy Hernandez, of the plan and show her the poison. Hernandez went and informed her homeroom teacher, Sherry Cockrill. Cockrill then informed the school principal, Claudia Argo. When Geiger entered her classroom that morning, she observed Reeves and Coffman leaning over her deck; and when the girls noticed her, they giggled and ran back to their seats. Geiger saw a purse lying next to her coffee cup on the top of the desk. Shortly after Argo called Coffman to the principal's office, rat poison was found in Coffman's purse. Both Reeves and Coffman gave written statement to the Sheriff investigator concerning their plan to poison Geiger and steal her car.
Adrian Navarro-Canales’s cousin came out and told investigators that Navarro-Canales had no friends at school that the family knew of. “Navarro-Canales was enrolled as a junior at Coronado High School in Henderson but hadn’t attended classes since school began in August.”(1) He spent more of his time playing video games and was known to be anti-social. His cousin also said that he didn’t like living in the United States and wanted to go live where he came from, which is Mexico. During the court hearing of Adrian Navarro-Canales, wearing his jail uniform and handcuffs, showed very little emotion when he entered plea. On Monday November 18, Adrian Navarro-Canales pleaded not guilty in Las Vegas.
Ps, Shamalee Lawson and Samory Hill, allege excessive force and false arrest. Ps allege that they were inside the park near basketball courts. P allege that MOS Napolitano, Grieco, Minardi, Radonice and other MOS assaulted and searched them. P allege they were arrest along with 17 other non-parties. P Lawson alleges that MOS did not provide a property voucher for his personal property. The criminal disposition in unknown at the time. No other information is known at this time. It is unclear what role, if any, MOS Thomas Napolitano played in this
In 2008, Luis M. Sanchez Valle was charged by the federal courts with trafficking weapons and ammunition in interstate commerce, and then was charged for the same offense by the Puerto Rican Courts. After Valle was convicted in federal, he filed a motion to dismiss the Puerto Rican Court’s ruling, saying it violated his 5th Amendment right to protection from Double Jeopardy. The prosecution argued that the United States and Puerto Rico derive their authority from different sources, and therefore can punish the same offenses without breaking his constitutional protections against double jeopardy. The case went through the trial court and then the court of appeals, which both agreed with Valle. It is now moving on to the Supreme Court.
The Appellant, Bethany Albescu ("Albescu"), was convicted of and indicted for corruptly obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding, in violation of § 1512(c)(2). JA1. Specifically, Albescu learned of a U.S. Immigration and Custom agency's ("ICE") and U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency's ("CBP") joint-task force investigation into a crime ring involving internet auction fraud. JA9. Albescu was partially involved in that crime ring. JA3:12-14.
On July 10, 1994, a woman was taken from her house by 2 men. Those men forced her to get into her car and drove off. They drove a couple of blocks away, where they took advantage of her (The Cases- Angel Gonzales pg. # 1). The victim was scared and felt lonely, she was lost and in need have help. She approached a gas station, where she called the police (Angel Gonzales – National Registry of exonerations pg. # 1). The police took a description of the attackers, both were 25 years old Hispanic men and were a height of (5'7). The victim's boyfriend gave a discretion of the car to the cops then later found the car himself, but that car belonged to Gonzales. The cops found Gonzales and immediately handcuffed him and placed him in a police car. The cops brought the victims which then, she confirmed that is was Gonzales. Gonzales felt attacked from every direction, although he
“Robert Bautista-Denied Due Process” in chapter 13 of the Golash-Boza text tells the story of legal permanent resident Robert Bautista, who
Sander’s justice was focused on the needs of the victims as well as the community. The testimony from the victim’s family; in this case the adult grand-children played a vital role in this case, followed by the offender’s testimony. Making things as right as possible for all parties involved. In this case, the Defense Attorney refrained from any inadequate information. Her duty was to present the facts and non-bias judgments as part of this case. The Maricopa Sheriffs department played an important and critical role, they exercised discretion when arresting and investigating Mr. Sanders. The Maricopa Sherriff’s department had an ethical responsibility and made non-biased, non-discriminatory calls and protect citizens. The Prosecutor’s ethical dilemma was the decisions how to prosecute Mr. Sanders after hearing family members testified in his defense. Judge Dilworth’s ethics played an important part, his interpretation of the law without having personal feelings or agendas to interfere with his responsibility. Investigators, Defense Attorneys, Prosecutors and Judges each have the power to make a decision, enforce the law, protect the constitution and serve the public (Introduction to Criminal
This matter comes before the Court regarding the Defendant’s Motion to Suppress evidence from an illegal search and seizure of the Defendant’s person and his vehicle on June 28, 2017.
Most defense attorneys rely on lack of knowledge, financial gain, and illegal police activity to defend their case. A lack of knowledge consists of the defendant not knowing that the victim is illegal. Therefore there is reasonable doubt, in which ca...
The Persons Case (officially Edwards v. A.G. of Canada) was a constitutional ruling that established the right of women to be appointed to the Senate.
The case was against a 31 year old illegal immigrant, Antonio Martinez-Nunez. Martinez-Nunez was the main suspect in a murder case involving Armando Castaneda. Castaneda was found dead in a parked car in Reynoldsburg, Ohio in August 2009. The cause of death was ruled as asphyxiation. In February of 2010, Martinez-Nunez, was arrested by border patrol, while trying to illegally re-enter the country via Texas. Upon his arrest, border patrol was advised that he was a suspect in the above murder case. Before being sent back to Ohio, Martinez-Nunez was questioned via phone by Reynoldsburg police. The questioning was done with the help of a Spanish interpreter. Martinez-Nunez’s statement led to a nine count
McOskar Enterprises, Inc. owns and manages a health and fitness center identified as “Curves for Women”. Tammey J. Anderson, the complainant, joined Curves on April 2, 2003. As part of the joining process Anderson signed a release of liability agreement. This agreement released Curves from any liabilities related to injuries that might be sustained by contributing in any activities or through the use of equipment. The agreement also stated that participants agreed to all risks of death or injury that could occur, Anderson read and signed the agreement of terms with Curves. After completing the liability agreement, Anderson began working out under the observation of a Curves’ trainer using the machines within the facility. During the workout Anderson notified the trainer that she began to feel pain in her neck, shoulder and arm, but finished her workout. She continued to feel the pain when she got home and pursued medical attention. As part of her prescribed medical treatment she was sent for a course a physical therapy. In June 2003 Anderson underwent a cervical discectomy, a procedure used to treat nerve or spinal cord compression. After her procedure Anderson sued Curves, claiming negligent acts during her workout. Anderson v. McOskar Enterprises, Inc., 712 NW 2d 796 (Minn. 2006).
Case Management Case management has become the standard method of managing health care delivery systems today. In recent decades, case management has become widespread throughout healthcare areas, professionals, and models in the United States. It has been extended to a wide range of clients (Park & Huber, 2009). The primary goal of case management is to deliver quality care to patients in the most cost effective approach by managing human and material resources. The focus of this paper is on the concept of case management and how it developed historically, the definition of case management, the components of case management, and how it relates to other nursing care delivery models.
My understanding of case management comes from an accumulation of lecture, readings, and a little bit of research. At first I thought case management meant to manage a case, which it kind of does, but it is a lot of background work that goes unnoticed from the workers part. One thing for sure I can say about case management is that is a very stressful and demanding job for the worker, therefore, you have to be a responsible worker, so that your client can hopefully get the services and resources he or she may need. As a case management worker your responsibilities are many, for example you are to educate, empower and enable your client to be self sufficient.