asg 2

1021 Words3 Pages

Many analysts have indicated that there is an increasing convergence in the different modes of warfare. They suggest that the greatest challenge in the future will not come from a single approach from a state, but state and non-state actors choosing from a variety of tactics and technology. They will also be used independently, or combined in new and innovative ways to create greater complexity. It is this variety of options that enable the threat to switch between and even use concurrently, these techniques and technologies, thus create confusion about where and who the enemy is, and complicate the battlefield with conditions that would not be expected when facing a conventional enemy. Because real world experience shows us that these threats have gone from being distractions in conventional warfare, to taking the centre stage in the contemporary operation environment (COE).

"Regardless of culture or Organization, being an effective Leader is a challenge. Even when provided with a clear definition of what makes a Leader effective, being effective in a Leadership role is often easier said than done" . Furthermore, the failure of most Organization to give Leaders the freedom to practice new skills or apply new gained knowledge is effecting negatively in mounting of the Leadership effectiveness. As a result, majority Leadership is routine, without ingenuity and with no further improvement in the job's produced quality.

Research indicates that the implement of adaptive Leadership maybe one of the best methods to counter the threats in the COE. That is to say that a Military Commander should be constantly observing the situation in order to identify any changing or emergent threats, and modify their approach accordingly. Bru...

... middle of paper ...

...ned, conducted, and sustained to accomplish strategic objectives within theaters or areas of operations." Tactical level is the level at which actions actually take place. Tactics is the employment and ordered arrangement of forces in relation to each other. Worth to mention , there are no restricted limits or boundaries between these levels, their purpose of employment depends mainly on the mission or tasks.

On the other hand, Adir mentioned three different levels in the literature of Management and Leadership generally classified as: strategic(top) level, organizational (operational) level and team(tactical) level .In today's unconventional battle and unstable business space ,these three different levels are less clearly defined. The strategic reach down to the tactical border and the tactical effect ascend to the highest level of strategic decision making .

Open Document