asdf

Even so critics like Djankow et al. (2008) generate concern about foreign aid by pointing to the larger purse that aid provides for countries, which provides for the possibility of more corruption. Furthermore, Alesina and Dollar (2000) argue that foreign aid is directed by corrupt, with little consideration for performance and recipients. Easterly himself provides little insight into aid preventing corruption, maybe to shield himself from academic percussion. But his theories themselves by rule should alleviate some corruption at least with respect to Sachs’ top-down mechanism. Accountability for aid’s success should in theory stop corruption, because independent evaluation of aid agencies, would make possible rewards for findings things that work and redirection of money to do more of those things. Thus, corruption would be limited as officials implement transparent policies that have to prove to their own people they work and improve their lives. Furthermore, the people are empowered to provide feedback to aid agencies within Easterly’s model. Fjeldstad and Isaksen (2008) argues that by rule an empowered population demands accountability. Thus, Easterly’s foreign aid model, albeit imperfect, still provides the best bet to reduce corruption within the field of foreign aid. Searchers find mechanism to let poor show what they want most and what they don’t want. When it comes to leaders generating wealth for only themselves and leaving the poor unattended Easterly’s accountability and feedback mechanisms makes their actions transparent. Thus reducing their probability.

Furthermore, foreign aid attacks by Harford and Klein (2005) do not make a valid argument for the sectional tiered approach for economic growth among the fruitful ...

... middle of paper ...

...y not have a modest plan to cure a symptom that is demanded by the population. Of course it becomes a small plan. Thus, there needs to be a combination of both the big-planned logistically abilities of scaling up in connection with searchers abilities to find market demands. Effectively, the market of the poor is the driving force that can create change; however, the implantation has to utilize an economy of scale to provide increased results. Thus, a policy not only has to be accountable to its people and provide feedback to the world it also has to provide the logistical means to carry out the alleviation process. In this way, a new global plan may not be to cure poverty, but increase the abilities of searchers within the domestic front. The core counties strategy could not be planning, but on oversight and providing the logistics of each organizational project.