Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Feminist theory analysis
Feminist theory analysis
Feminist theory analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Feminist theory analysis
Evaluating the accuracy of potential knowledge is essential in developing an understanding of the world. According to the theory of situated knowledge, however, this process isn't as simple as observing from a neutral, unattached perspective. Rather, the theory suggests that your situation and past experiences heavily influence what knowledge you hold, why you hold it, and your likelihood of accepting differing information. If perspective indeed influences what knowledge you hold, it follows that there is the potential for some people to have more accurate perspectives than others. I argue that feminist empiricism accounts for this more honestly and appropriately than standpoint theory, but that feminist empiricism must be thoughtfully applied to avoid being inappropriately inclusive of every perspective.
Standpoint theory centres on the “inversion hypothesis,” suggesting that those who are oppressed or marginalized by structures of systematic domination may have epistemological privilege. This privilege, Wylie explains, could manifest itself in the marginalized understanding things that the dominant group may be unaware of, or as a deeper understanding of the situation around them, stemming from their ability to relate to the powerful while having experienced being powerless (Wylie, 26). Wylie attempts to disassociate standpoint theory from two of its common criticisms, one of which is the assumption of automatic epistemic privilege for marginalized groups (28). Wylie suggests that it is instead positions that “put the critically conscious knower in a position to grasp the effects of power relations” which offer the epistemic privilege (34). However, this response leads to two unworkable interpretations. If Wylie's adjustment i...
... middle of paper ...
...ut that isn't a reason for discrediting them on other suggestions. By realizing that what privileges someone in one regard might actually hinder them in another, we can better discuss and incorporate a range of perspectives.
The realization that knowledge is situated powerfully affects how we generate knowledge. While standpoint theory offers a valuable critique that validates previously ignored perspectives, even Wylie's perspective on epistemological privilege is difficult to accept. A tempered and thoughtfully implemented feminist empiricism, therefore, offers a better way of understanding and generating knowledge in our dynamic and varied world.
Works Cited
Wylie, Alison. "Why Standpoint Matters," in Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology, edited by Robert Figueroa and Sandra Harding, Routledge, New York, 2003, pp. 26-48.
Feminisms Matter: Debates, Theories, Activism, is a book that analyzes gender studies and theories among the ages and relates it to towards the issues that occur in everyday life. Chapter four of the text is seen to draw heavily on the issue of intersectionality and how it creates binary categories that defy the complexities of human beings . Society integrates many identities that work to categorize people into certain groups. These certain groups is what dictate the actions and view of the people within. However, this outdated use of segregating people is the main problem in terms of in terms of intersectionality as it is a form of discrimination . Victoria L. Bromley, the author of Feminism Matter, discusses the use of intersectionality
Power and privilege may be challenging and trigger defensiveness from white counterparts. However, it is important to recognize the systemic privilege that whites have over those who come from disadvantaged groups. Prior, to the readings I had a little knowledge of the power and privilege but I did not know the avenues that privileged people do to ensure that their children enroll in the top universities and colleges. As a result, whites have greater access to certain higher social status and income levels that will position them to have greater control over decision-making. This privilege reinforces the imbalance of privilege that whites have over racialized groups.
Jackson, A. (2004). Gender & work: Knowledge production in practice. In A. Jackson (Ed.), (1 ed., Vol. 1). North York: York University. Retrieved from http://www.genderwork.ca/conference/Jackson_edited_final.pdf
I believe that one of the most oppressive systems is “white privilege”, which is defined by Peggy MacIntosh as an invisible set of unearned assets and advantages held by white people. Although I agree with her definition, I disagree with her argument that “white privilege” is imperceptible. MacIntosh says that it is“like an invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools and blank checks”(83). Yet, I believe that it is not invisible to whites; rather it is their choice to ignore its existence which make “white privilege” invisible. By choosing to ignore it whites can continue to reap the benefits of their privilege without...
Therefore, Feminists, advocates, practitioners, and scholars need to be prepared to develop the kind of courage that is needed. The intellectual stamina and energy required to exercise feminist curiosity do not come uninvited. It is consciously cultivated and nurtured. I feel this revelation by Enloe is not meant to discourage us from exercising feminist curiosity. Rather, I believe it is an honest admission that there is a personal cost involved in pursuing social justice – a kind of cost that is more of an encouragement than a dissuasion. I feel this is meant to motivate and inspire us to expense energy to roll off the boulders on the door to shed lights on women’s situations. It is often said that you need to know your enemy in order to fight them. I believe this is the point Enloe is driving at. It is only when we know that people will raise eyebrows, make condescending remarks and gestures that will we be in the position to prepare well for an insightful and constructive
The message of Lugones and Spelman in Have We Got a Theory for You! Feminist Theory, Cultural Imperialism and the Demand for “The Woman’s Voice,” is that the entire worldwide experience of women cannot be universally articulated. Blanket definition of woman is impossible due to the many characteristics of women that make the gender so diverse, specifically race and economic status in society. “The women’s voices most likely to come forth and the women’s voices mostly likely to be heard are, in the United States anyway, those of white, middle-class, heterosexual Christian women” (Lugones and Spelman 21). Since “feminist theory” has been established without encompassing the inherently different experiences of non-white/non-Anglo women “much of the theory has failed to be relevant to the lives of women who are not white or middle class” (Ibid. 21). This displacement of a large population of the world’s women from feminist theory is extremely threatening to the development of a woman’s voice, in so far as this voice is key to fighting the battles that feminism sets out to fight: the end of re...
Feminism is commonly thought of as a tool for educating society on the rights of women. It teaches that a woman is equal to a man in every civil and societal accord. Realizing this is not always the case, Charlotte Bunch, a noted lesbian feminist of the 1970s also defined feminism as "a way of looking at the world - a questioning of power [and] domination issues" (WIE). Many feminists attempt to bulrush the ideals of stereotypical women and push them away from those who believe in these standards. "Feminist scholars also seek to question and transform androcentric [sic] systems of thought which position the male as the norm," says Barbara McManus. They strive to find, examine, and eliminate biases in a world encumbered with intolerant men who see women as thoughtless objects and most certainly not equals. Other women announce their impressive intellect, economic well-being, and individual personalities to the people who oppose them. "A woman should always present herself and explain her forthcoming jaunts into Feminists, like Edna, howe...
Moving toward critical analysis on the basis of gender and power relations signaled a shift of focus from the methodological to the epistemological concerns for the feminists. The questions raised were about the source of the behavior and experiences. Even within this view of gendered relation two different types permeated the feminist community – those that subscribed to an essentialist view held that women’s development is uniquely different from that of men and they are much better than men; those that adhered to the social constructionist view took the position that true natures of men and women are unknowable, i.e. the characteristics attributed to males and females are not intrinsic but socially and situationally created. Gilligan (1982)
The reoccurring changes in society depict on how one views and expresses their personal opinion about the environment in which we live. Negative stereotypes spread rapidly against career driven women in the 1980’s. Susan Faludi, author of Backlash, explained circumstances where people argued against feminism in her book. The specific examples justified her point of view on how women were being taken advantage of, resulting in the book becoming a bestseller. Yet some were influencing negative opinions about her book, she knew she had potential to impact those who felt as if they were going downhill in life as the mistreated ones.
With this analogy, I find confluence in central arguments made by Ong, Bartholomae and Foucault that are worth mentioning. I am not disputing the rhetoric of these three great thinkers/ readers. I am simply attempting to “define a position of privilege, a position that sets [me] against a ‘common’ discourse…” working “self-consciously, critically, against not only the ‘common’ code but [my] own” (Bartholomae 644). However, for now, I am suggesting that a reader doesn’t “have to play the role in which the author has cast him” (Ong 60), but that there is more to it.
The phrase, “look at what I do” is a reminder of Psychodynamic theory, because in social work, psychosocial practice in which the person-in-environment is the focus of attention, applications in group work and residential care have also been influential. Another tool for graph ( is the Feministic perspectives; it gives information about the hardship and abuses that many Hispanic/Latinos women face. Payne (2007) explains that the feminist perspectives focus on explaining and responding to the oppressed position of women in many societies. By using this perspective, (understanding) will help me better understand the issues that affect women worldwide. How can one fight back in a society that discriminates or cringe at the sight of women in power. The answer is education (preparation); Hispanic women have shown that women can be educated without looking back at negative insults. According to Vera, (2005) the educational process leads to a valuing of their culture and a reawakened pride in their cultural roots. Most of the women had taken college courses that led to an awareness of social concepts, such as racism and
In just a few decades The Women’s Liberation Movement has changed typical gender roles that once were never challenged or questioned. As women, those of us who identified as feminist have rebelled against the status quo and redefined what it means to be a strong and powerful woman. But at...
Society is highly stratified when considering social classes i.e. - upper class, middle class, lower class, and working class citizens. That being said, not everyone has the same access to the superstructure; thus creating tension. The largest problem when considering structure and agency is the constant struggle and negotiation of power inequality. Among the asymmetry of power are two major disparities; class and gender. Thinking as a critical theorist, one must consider the individual’s participation in the public sphere; “The word means a false view of the world that is in the interests of the powerful citizens in order to keep the subordinate classes oppressed” (Habermas, 10). Though the public sphere is virtually a democratic sphere where ideas can circulate and opinions are formed there are certain restrictions when referring to lower classes and women and thus how their agencies as individuals are limited.
Feminist epistemology involves the study the theory of knowledge i.e. epistemology from q feminist standpoint; the disadvantage faced by women through knowledge and justification. It is usually said to be concerned with how our knowledge is influenced by gender through justification and inquiry. Feminist’s epistemology is ideally based on the fact that by the perspective of a certain theory is affected upon by the knowledge pertaining the theory. The themes which characterize feminist epistemology are not unique it on only, since the themes are also found in the filed science studies and social epistemology. However, feminist epistemology is distinct from both science studies and social epistemology in that, for reconstructing and analysis, gender is characterize used. However, feminists have always argued gender rather than being determined
Minas, A. (2000). Gender basics: Feminist perspective on women and men.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.