Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Values and Ethics sociology
The concept of value philosophically
The concept of value philosophically
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Values and Ethics sociology
The concept of value – in terms of being a descriptive ‘goodness’, physically external to a person – has been discussed and researched since the times of ancient Greek philosophers – Plato & Aristotle. It was one of the central themes of Adam Smith’s work (1776) and of Karl Marx (1909). In marketing, the discussion on value was initially centred on utility added by the marketer; the consumers were seen as rational and utility-maximising individuals (Arndt, 1981; Converse, 1945; Holbrook, 1987; Kotler, 1967, 1973; Schaefer & Crane, 2005; Tauber, 1972; Thomas, Challagalla, & McFarland, 1999). Value research has been debated widely in the last three decades and some distinct schools of thought have emerged, which I have discussed in the next section. The American Marketing Association has also given due importance to value in its last three definitions, replacing product as the intended object of exchange. The latest definition (as of January 2014) reads: “Marketing is the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for customers, clients, partners, and society at large” (“Definition of Marketing,” 2013, emphasis added).
Some important conceptions of value from Philosophy, Sociology and Economics
One of the foremost thinkers on value – Plato – proposed the idea of intrinsic value and instrumental i.e. extrinsic value. The concept of intrinsic value refers to value that something has in itself, while items with instrumental value are good to have as they become a means to achieve some other purpose (Seung, 1996; Zimmerman, 2010). Plato’s student, Aristotle divided value into two types – use value and exchange value (Fleetwood, 1997). According to...
... middle of paper ...
...romarketing, 25(1), 76–92. doi:10.1177/0276146705274987
Seung, T. K. (1996). Plato Rediscovered. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1st ed.). London: W. Strahan. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/QrfBc8
Staveren, I. van. (2001). The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Tauber, E. M. (1972). Why Do People Shop ? Journal of Marketing, 36(4), 46–49.
Thomas, W., Challagalla, G. N., & McFarland, R. G. (1999). Anatomy of Exchange. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(4), 8–19.
Zimmerman, M. J. (2010). Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 201.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/value-intrinsic-extrinsic/
Heilbroner, Robert L. The Worldly Philosophers: the Lives, Times, and Ideas of the Great Economic Thinkers. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1999. Print.
1b. Socrates states that goods can come in 3 forms such as: intrinsic goods, which are harmless pleasures, intrinsic and instrumental good, such as health and knowledge, and finally he states the third being instrumental goods, which is health and exercise. Socrates believes Justice should fall into the second category with both intrinsic and instrumental goods. Glaucon states that the popular view of justice is that justice is there be not because it’s something good to do, but because people are scared that unjust things will be done to them.
Different people have numerous elucidations of what is valuable to them. In the “Contingencies of Value” chapter by Barbara Herrnstein Smith she discusses the diverse ways in which various values are created, sustained and passed along. Part one of the article is the act of evaluation -- what it is we are doing when we evaluate an art work, a culture, a belief, a practice -- and her secondary topic is the meaning of value. She states that “value is “relative” in the sense of contingent (that is, a changing function of multiple variables) rather than subjective (that is, personally whimsical, locked into the consciousness of individual subjects and/or without interest or value for other people). Her text shows that we may not be able to bluntly
Customer value is defined as "the perceived benefit of a product, used by customers to determine whether or not to buy the product" (Lussier, 2006). I do believe that most customer's focus on creating customer value. It is an aspect needed in order to sell anything. A customer would not buy something if she or he did not see the benefit in buying it, therefore, organizations strive to create customer value because they need the customer to see a benefit and to buy the product.
What is value? To take a logical standpoint, it could be defined as the monetary worth of something: a candy bar’s value is one dollar. But to most people, value is more far reaching than a number. To chocolate lovers, a candy bar’s value is a few minutes of bliss; the chocolate hits your tongue and melts; the overwhelming decadence of that smooth, velvety sweetness is enough to keep you happy for the rest of the day. So, value is all about perspective, and it is also a driving force in motivation: value drives people. People work to make money, to buy valuable things or to buy valuable time in the form of a vacation. Rewards – values – are what keeps the economy turning and the world working. In the novel Brave New World, Aldous Huxley crafts a hyper-materialistic society in which arbitrary thoughts, actions and relationships are encouraged; through satire, wordplay, and hyperbolized backwardness, Huxley shows the consequences of a world without value.
Glaucon makes the assertion that there are three categories of goods: instrumental, intrinsic, or both. The first category of goods, instrumentally valuable goods, are described
As a precursor to the challenge, Glaucon presents the three types of good. The first being it is valued for its own sake, but not its results, relating to harmless pleasure (357b). The second is it is valued for its own sake and its results, like thinking (357c). The final is that which we value for only its results, comparable to physical exercise (357c). Socrates then places justice in the second category, “valued for anyone who wants to be happy, both for itself and for its consequences” (358a). It is this belief that Glaucon attempts to dissuade throughout his challenge (358a).
The “father of economics” was born in Scotland. His birth occurred during the year of 1723. Adam Smith’s renowned book The Wealth of Nations examined the idea of capital and money, the progress of industry, and the results of European trade and commerce. The Wealth of Nations was written in 1776. Even though it has been more than two-hundred years since the book was released, it is still a relevant example of how to create and run a prosperous market. In this book, Smith introduced land, labor, and capital and how these things, also known as the factors of production, can produce the nation’s wealth.
David Ricardo as one of representative economist in the classics economy, their studies have made outstanding contributions not only to the classical political economy but also to the whole society.
Lauderdale, J. n.d. Observations on the review of his inquiry into the nature and origin of public wealth. Edinburgh: Printed by D. Willison, 1804.
According to the customer value triad theory by Earl Naumann, “value is a combination of quality, service and price” (Naumann, 1995). In this case quality could be defined as performance quality, the objective quality of a product (Kotler & Keller, 2012). A product with high performance quality, increases the value of a product. The value of a product is furthermore positively influenced by the service that is delivered (Kotler & Keller, 2012). The price however, can both positively and negatively influence the value of a product. A high price will in most cases decrease the value, but for some exclusive and luxury goods, a high price increases the value. The exclusivity, which is of intangible nature, is than one of the most important determinants of the value of the product. For most normal goods however, the objective quality is the prime determinant of the value. Although intangible benefits can be important in determining the value of a product, in most cases it is still the tangible benefits and costs, the objective quality and the price.
Some, such as Toby Syoboda, claim that “human beings lack any evidence for the position that non-human entities have intrinsic value”. Svoboda proposes that we cannot assign intrinsic value, as in another world that thing may not possess any value at all; however, I propose that things can have intrinsic value on the grounds that they are valuable with no regard to their function in human society, meaning that value does not come from being instrumental. I believe intrinsic value is something can exist with and without instrumental value; the most apparent example of something with both forms of value is friends; whilst friends do have instrumental value by giving us connections and doing us favours, they also have value in-themselves. Of course, I expect a friend to help me if they can, but if they cannot I value them no less, even though their instrumental value would be less significant to me. Moreover, there are also instances where things have had instrumental value, that has been lost or taken away leaving purely intrinsic value. A prime example of this is Marilyn Monroe’s “Happy Birthday, Mr. President Dress”. This year, the dress sold at auction for $4.8 million, so that it can be displayed in Ripley’s Believe it or Not Museum. Normally, an expensive dress is purchased as it is well fitted, or made of a material which will last a long time but ultimately to make the person wearing it more attractive. However, in this instance, one of histories most expensive dresses is merely sitting in a display. Whilst the dress could have this instrumental value, the intrinsic value overwhelms it to the extent that its instrumental purpose becomes redundant. On the other hand, we can also have value completely exclusive of instrumental value. For instance, Van Gogh’s painting, The Starry Night, to most people, holds absolutely no
Value is perceived in different ways, by customers and organisations in relation to the product or service that is provided. The definition of value is what something is worth and the desirability. Also what is gained from the money aspect, and to whether the product or service actually fulfils its purpose.
The concept of spirit is meaningful. Our experience of value requires it. What are the sources of value? What gives them their authority? Reason, social conditioning, biological drives based on natural selection have all been proposed as sources. There is a great deal of truth in these proposals. However, reflection convinces us that none of these sources is alone sufficient, and even the three working together are not enough to account for all the values that motivate us. We shall support this conviction by argument in due course. Spirit is a hypothesis, as yet in early stages of definition, which provides a ground for otherwise unaccountable value phenomena.
Value is a term that expresses the concept of worth in general, according to Wordiq (2010) and it is thought to be connected to reasons for certain practices, policies or actions. According to (Lopper, 2008) value is, a principle, or quality intrinsically valuable or desirable.