Wounded Platoon Reflection

723 Words2 Pages

“Wounded Platoon” is a documentary that delves into the severe effects of tours and post-traumatic stress on young individuals in the U.S. Army. This documentary mainly focuses on the psychological aspect of PTSD and the effects of war on the soldiers. However, looking at it from a sociological approach, it’s clear to see the role of group dynamics, teams and leadership in the behaviors of soldiers prior to their discharge from the war front.
Group dynamics is defined as the various patterns of interaction between groups and individuals and the way a group is influenced to both achieve a great goal, or commit horrendous crimes. This documentary concentrated on the Third Platoon, First Battalion, 506th infantry, better known as the “Band of …show more content…

Group cohesion is the sense of solidarity or loyalty that individuals feel toward a group to which they belong. For the soldiers, many of whom came from rough backgrounds, felt a sense of belonging once they joined the army. They all shared the goal of serving their country, shared traumatic experiences, and even felt similar emotions in each situation they faced. But in order to make a group act as a cohesive unit, there needs to be a leader who can exercise his or her authority with power that can influence a group so strongly that for the individuals this groups becomes their primary group. In this case, the leader was Sergeant Sean Huey. Huey exercised his authority by being a leader that was both instrumental as well as expressive. In regards to being an instrumental leader, Huey was concerned with his men carrying out their duties of drawing out insurgent attacks, finding IEDs , and having his men fulfill the qualities of being brave as well as lethal while serving in Baghdad. As for being expressive, Huey was popular amongst the lower ranks and believed that each individual in his platoon had the potential to be a good soldier; Huey was …show more content…

The soldier said, “They’re all hajis to me…. They’re not like us, they’re not the same as us. It’s how you look at them. They’re hajis and we’re not.” This quote provides the viewer a glimpse into how the platoon strongly defined the “us” in the in-group and the “them” of the out-group. “Hajis” was the term used by the soldiers in reference to the civilians of Afghanistan. It wasn’t a term of endearment, rather it was a term that dehumanized the civilians that the soldiers had to interact with. It is because of this in-group/out-group dynamic that reckless killings of innocent civilians occurred

Open Document