In high school, every athletes dream is to work hard and to earn a scholarship at the next level. Football, basketball, and baseball are the hardest sports to play at the college level. The NCAA is the governing body for the college sports, and has strict rules and regulations when it comes to the topic of “paying athletes”. Some would argue that an athlete should be satisfied with earning a scholarship and that is enough for their hard work, but is it really? At all division 1 schools “scholarships” covers the necessities which include room and board, meal plans, books, and college tuition. Most people would agree that NCAA sports (football, basketball, baseball) are just as competitive as the professionals, and its annual cash flow makes that point very clear.
Professional football and basketball is the dream of all athletes. There is only one way to achieve this dream, the NCAA. Football and basketball combined had let a total of 3 players to ever take the route straight out of high school. The NCAA sets the rule for college sports. For their talent student athletes are giving a free education and chance to show case their skills (Schooled). They must abide by amateurism rule, not accepting any payment outside their scholarship. Athletes not only have class, but meetings, practice, and tutoring, every day. There is no time for obtaining an outside job to make extra money.
Magazines, games, and commercials are used to promote a school. The student athletes get no cash for being in video games or having their jerseys sold out in stores. They are given no money for grocery shopping. They pull in millions of dollars, and it all goes to the administrators and coaches. The athletes have nothing to show for, but the scholarship th...
... middle of paper ...
...to work. People would like the chance to make and have money, but because of their situation they are unable too.
Athletic scholarships aren’t given out to anybody; they are given out to the best. They do not cover the entire tuition; money from outside must be brought in to cover an athlete’s scholarship. The athletes should get more from the sponsors to help with their needs. Athletes should be compensated for the work that they provide for their university. It is not fair that they suffer because of the rules and regulations from the NCAA. I am for athletes getting paid. This will forever be an ongoing debate.
Work Cited
Honore, Russel. Work Is a Blessing. Everyone's an Author. New York: W.W. Norton, 2012. 79-82. Print
Schooled: The Price of College Sports. Dir. Ross Finkel, Trevor Martin, and Jonathan Paley. Perf. Kevin Anderson. Makuhari Media, 2013. DVD
Association such as the NFL and NBA aren't filled with a lot of people. Barely anybody will actually make it that far, and some people practice for countless hours. "According to a poll from last year only 7.6% of highschool athletes play for college level sports, and only 1.7% go pro from college sports. And when you think about it people who play for college had to practice for such a large amount of time and there not even pro (Manfred)!" So why should the 55.5% of students who play ...
Some feel that by not paying college athletes that college institutions are thereby exploiting their athletes free of charge, which is unfair. However, this article feels that college athletes are paid very favorably by the large amount of money they receive for schooling through scholarships. Also, since college athletes don’t pay to play or go to school they are receiving a free college degree whether or not they decide to stay in school for four years or not. With the training that they receive from professional trainers and nutritionists for a professional controlled diet they save possibly thousands within the 4 years they attend school and perform in collegiate athletics.
First lets explore the history behind the paying of college athletes. Over the past 50 years the NCAA has been in control of all Div.1, 2 and 3 athletic programs. The NCAA is an organization that delegates and regulates what things college athletes can and can’t do. These regulations are put in place under the label of ‘protecting amateurism’ in college sports. This allots
... being paid. Many people prefer watching college sports over professional sports based on the idea that money isn’t involved in college sports. They are competing and giving everything they have for the love of their teammates, the love of their school, and above all, their love for the game. Paying athletes would ruin this standard of intercollegiate athletics. For all these reasons, college athletes should not be paid beyond their full ride scholarships.
Luzer, Daniel. "College Guide: The Profit in College Sports." The Washington Monthly. N.p., 18 Sept. 2013. Web. 8 Apr. 2014.
Student athletes should not be paid more than any other student at State University, because it implies that the focus of this university is that an extracurricular activity as a means of profit. Intercollegiate athletics is becoming the central focus of colleges and universities, the strife and the substantial sum of money are the most important factors of most university administration’s interest. Student athletes should be just as their title states, students. The normal college student is struggling to make ends meet just for attending college, so why should student athletes be exempt from that? College athletes should indeed have their scholarships cover what their talents not only athletically but also academically depict. Unfortunately, the disapproval resides when students who are making leaps academically are not being offered monetary congratulations in comparison to student athletes. If the hefty amount of revenue that colleges as a conglomerate are making is the main argument for why athletes should be paid, then what is to stop the National Clearinghouse from devising unjust standards? Eventually if these payments are to continue, coaches, organizations, and the NCAA Clearinghouse will begin to feel that “c...
One of the strongest arguments against student athletes getting paid is that many people feel they already are getting paid, through their financial aid package. Sports Illustrated author, Seth Davis, states in his article “Hoop Thoughts”, that “student athletes are already being payed by earning a free tuition. Which over the course of four years can exceed $200,000, depending on the school they attend. They are also provided with housing, textbooks, food and academic tutoring. When they travel to road games, they are given per diems for meals. They also get coaching, training, game experience and media exposure in their respective crafts” (Davis, 2011). This is a considerable amount of income. While the majority of regular students are walking out of school with a sizeable amount of debt, most student athletes are debt free. Plus they get to enjoy other benefits that are not made available to the average student. They get to travel with their teams, t...
Horace Mitchell discusses this topic in his article, on usnews.com. In the article Horace’s main point is that college athletes are not professional, therefor they should not get paid. He also brings up the fact that most college athletes pay less for college because of their athletic scholarships. Which they are only able to obtain because they play a sport, and normal students do not have access to these benefits. Yes, regular students have academic scholarships, student athletes can get both, academic and sport scholarships. I think that because
There are many aspects to an NCAA players eligibility, most of them are disputed against. One of these topics is players getting paid. Numerous questions are raised by this topic. The largest of these questions is “Should NCAA players get paid?.” Surprisingly, the pros for paying the athletes outnumber the reasons for not paying them. The athletes are basically workers for their school, they devote hours to their sport, they take time out of their classes, thus making their scholarships less valuable, and the NCAA teams would be more successful.
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
The payment of NCAA student-athletes will deteriorate the value of an education to the athletes. The value of an education for a young man or woman cannot be measured. It is our gate way to success as...
Financial aspects and profitability of college athletic programs is one of the most important arguments involved in this controversy. A group of people expresses that college athletic programs are over emphasized. The point they show on the first hand, is that athletic programs are too expensive for community colleges and small universities. Besides, statistics prove that financial aspects of college athletic programs are extremely questionable. It is true that maintenance, and facility costs for athletic programs are significantly high in comparison to academic programs. Therefore, Denhart, Villwock, and Vedder argue that athletic programs drag money away from important academics programs and degrade their quality. According to them, median expenditures per athlete in Football Bowl Subdivision were $65,800 in 2006. And it has shown a 15.6 percent median expenditure increase fro...
I believe that college sports should be considered a profession. Athletes deserve to be paid for their work. College athletics are a critical part of America’s culture and economy. At the present time, student-athletes are considered amateurs. College is a stepping-stone to the professional leagues. The NCAA is exploiting the student- athlete. Big-time schools are running a national entertainment business that controls the compensation rate of the players like a monopoly (Byers 1).
Another reason that college athletes should not be paid is because they are, under NCAA rules, to be considered amateurs. In the National Collegiate Athletic Association Rules it states, “College athletes are not to be paid, not to cash in on their prominence, never to cross any kind of line of professionalism.” Steve Wieberg, of the USA Today, studied the rules that the NCAA has placed on paying college athletes. He concludes that, “Athletic programs are meant to be an integral part of the educational program” (Weinberg). The reoccurring theme here should be obvious now —education is the most important part of the student’s time in college and being an athlete should come second.
Recently the NCAA has been under a lot of pressure over the issue of paying college athletes in return for the extreme amount of revenue and wealth brought to the university by being successful on national television. The dispute has brought up issues on both sides of the controversy as to what should happen with the millions of dollars student athletes generate through the highly publicized and money making games and tournaments in college sports. The major money making sports in college athletics are undoubtedly football and men’s basketball. These two sports combined have year round ESPN and national television coverage which creates multi-billion dollar revenues that the schools rake in. So the question remains, why should high profile student athletes not be paid for their accomplishments on the field or court? There is a strict line between an amateur and a pro which