Tuckman Theory Case Study

1006 Words3 Pages

Working in Teams and Leadership
Founder of the Tuckman theory, Dr Brue Tuckman, based his five-stage model on origins of both sociological and psychological aspects (Chapman, 2013). The Tuckman theory (Figure 4) is vital, as Ethan must acknowledge TATI’s current situation and measure the progress.

Figure 4 Tuckman Theory Model (Tuckman.B, n.d.)
In order for TATI to gradually mature into a more adequate workforce. As the cliché saying goes, “There is no ‘I’ in TEAM.” (ref) When collaboration is applied efficiently, rewarding results are revealed due to higher performing levels. Unity is in potency. Organisations often use a team of people where they can accomplish far more, than the sum of the total of the individual talents alone. So common …show more content…

Nevertheless, Linda is perceived to be an abusive Authority Obedience Manager. Both James/Linda have low concern for people. However, James and Linda production is completely opposite. Linda’s productively is high, James is low. Another element of leadership theories is ‘context fitting’. Ethan displays quality leadership abilities as well as effective management notions. This theme of concern for people and production is proportionately high, from this TATI has the potential to rekindle into a positive …show more content…

As the cliché saying goes, “There is no ‘I’ in TEAM.” (ref) When collaboration is applied efficiently, rewarding results are revealed due to higher performing levels. Unity is in potency. Organisations often use a team of people where they can accomplish far more, than the sum of the total of the individual talents alone. So common goals and active involvement is achieved. In relative relevance to TATI as a team, they do not demonstrate a cohesive well working environment, as expected in professional organisations should. Staff are bias and prejudiced. Linda acted on personal preferences and opted for favored employers that she initially hired, rather than the quality of work ethic. Furthermore, Linda has the immense majority of the workload. Ultimately, central staff members that are below the higher staff (Linda/John) are convinced that a strategic planning process is being void. It’s clear that TATI is in between ‘storming’ and just slightly in ‘norming’ when really they should be capable to be at the ‘performing’ and ‘adjourning’ stage. Incorporating a shared responsibility in each staff member is far more productive. One person to perform the majority of the labor and having others just do next to none, like James is ineffective. Ethan should look to rising responsibility of each team member in the forthcoming

More about Tuckman Theory Case Study

Open Document