Working in Teams and Leadership
Founder of the Tuckman theory, Dr Brue Tuckman, based his five-stage model on origins of both sociological and psychological aspects (Chapman, 2013). The Tuckman theory (Figure 4) is vital, as Ethan must acknowledge TATI’s current situation and measure the progress.
Figure 4 Tuckman Theory Model (Tuckman.B, n.d.)
In order for TATI to gradually mature into a more adequate workforce. As the cliché saying goes, “There is no ‘I’ in TEAM.” (ref) When collaboration is applied efficiently, rewarding results are revealed due to higher performing levels. Unity is in potency. Organisations often use a team of people where they can accomplish far more, than the sum of the total of the individual talents alone. So common
…show more content…
Nevertheless, Linda is perceived to be an abusive Authority Obedience Manager. Both James/Linda have low concern for people. However, James and Linda production is completely opposite. Linda’s productively is high, James is low. Another element of leadership theories is ‘context fitting’. Ethan displays quality leadership abilities as well as effective management notions. This theme of concern for people and production is proportionately high, from this TATI has the potential to rekindle into a positive …show more content…
As the cliché saying goes, “There is no ‘I’ in TEAM.” (ref) When collaboration is applied efficiently, rewarding results are revealed due to higher performing levels. Unity is in potency. Organisations often use a team of people where they can accomplish far more, than the sum of the total of the individual talents alone. So common goals and active involvement is achieved. In relative relevance to TATI as a team, they do not demonstrate a cohesive well working environment, as expected in professional organisations should. Staff are bias and prejudiced. Linda acted on personal preferences and opted for favored employers that she initially hired, rather than the quality of work ethic. Furthermore, Linda has the immense majority of the workload. Ultimately, central staff members that are below the higher staff (Linda/John) are convinced that a strategic planning process is being void. It’s clear that TATI is in between ‘storming’ and just slightly in ‘norming’ when really they should be capable to be at the ‘performing’ and ‘adjourning’ stage. Incorporating a shared responsibility in each staff member is far more productive. One person to perform the majority of the labor and having others just do next to none, like James is ineffective. Ethan should look to rising responsibility of each team member in the forthcoming
Kumle, J., Kelly N. (August 2006), leadership vs. management, Supervision 67(8), 11, Retrieved January 9, 2007, from ProQuest database.
Teams have become integral parts and driving forces of success in organizations. A key common attribute among highly
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Within my placement organisation, staff members will generally work as part of a team as well as having an individual role. For the team to be efficient all members must know their own role within the team, liaise with each other, and look to improve individual strengths and weaknesses. This collaboration helps to build a successful team, built on trust and effective communication.
Sims Jr., H. P., Faraj, S., & Yun, S. (2009). When should a leader be directive or empowering? How to develop your own situational theory of leadership. Business Horizons, 52, 149-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2008.10.002
Effective teams must be developed, not just formed. A group is not a team. Members of a group may sometimes work together, but members of a team always work together. The team need not all be in the same place to be working together. “With a group, the whole is often equal to or less than the sum of its parts; with a team, the whole is always greater” (Oakley, Brent, Felder and Elhajj, 2004). A team, as defined above, has certain characteristics that make it effective. Not all of these traits are present when a team is in the forming stage. Tea...
“In this theory of leadership, the achievement of the leader is a function of various exigencies in the form of task, subordinates and/or group variables. Effectiveness of a certain pattern of a leader’s behavior is dependent upon the burdens imposed by situation. These concepts stress using diverse styles of leadership suitable to the needs shaped by various organizational circumstances. Some of the theories are as follows:”
Tuckman’s theory of development claims, “In the first stage of team development or organization, individuals come together to establish the ground ru...
There are good and bad leaders in every organization. This can be due to a lack of experiences, personality, or multiple other factors. If the reason a leader is not considered a good leader due to a lack of experience they can easily understand the techniques being used by the leaders around them. To know what is working for them, and what is not can be a huge advantage as a new leader begins their career. If their personality is the reason for their bad leadership, this can also be changed. It takes a lot of time and effort by the bad leader to change their personality to work with those around them. However, there are some personality traits that cannot be changed, due to their past of how the leader was raised. This paper will look at two leaders in the healthcare field, one considered a bad leader and the other considered a good leader. They are a two different stages in their careers which helps contribute to the bad and good leader titles. Their names have been changed for anonymity.
An entrepreneur is a person who organizes manages and assumes the risks of a business or enterprise. He is a business leader and an innovator of new ideas and processes. There are four basic characteristics that are required in order to become a successful entrepreneur: Firstly, personal characteristics like optimism, vision, initiative, desire for control, drive and persistence, risk tolerance and resilience. Secondly, interpersonal skills which are required in order to build great relationships with the team, customers, suppliers, shareholders and other parties. They include leadership and motivation, communication skills, listening, personal relations, negotiations and ethics. Thirdly,
5) “as a cooperative method that lets in regular people to achieve extraordinary effects”. Harris & Harris (1996) additionally give an explanation for that a team has a common purpose or cause where Team individuals can expand effective, mutual relationships to gain group desires. Teamwork replies upon people working collectively in cooperative surroundings to reap common team goals via sharing knowledge and talents. The literature consistently highlights that one of the essential factors of a team is its recognition toward a collective goal and a clean motive (Fisher, Hunter, & Macrosson, 1997; Johnson & Johnson, 1995, 1999; Parker, 1990; Harris & Harris, 1996). Teams are a fundamental part of many corporations and must be integrated as a part of the transport of tertiary
Leadership theories and styles (2009);IAAP 2009 Administrative Professionals Week Event [Online] available from: http://www.etsu.edu/ahsc/documents/Leadership_Theories.pdf Accessed 29 March 2014
Many everyday activities require people to collaborate with others, but there not the same type of group: school group, therapy group, business group, and many others. A study, Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited, written by Mary Ann C. Jensen shared the acknowledgment with Bruce W. Tuckman as coauthor. This article focuses on further study of Tuckman’s model through other literature with tested data.
The team work helps the organization to improve their tasks and output efficiency. The team can work well only when all the members show their interest and motivation towards doing work collectively. The good team members usually make a strong working team. But, if the members show their personal concerns and standards in managing tasks, then the team will lose its strength. And at the end all the members will face the loss. In this case study Jane, Robert, Danny, Sharon and Liz were the part of a team, but they were from the different categories of the people (West, 2012, p. 36). Their interests and wills were more important, then the common goals and objectives of the team. All they were not serious at all about their presentation