Throughout our nation’s history, women have played an important role in the military. It has not been until recently however, that women have been able to fully contribute to the military and be recognized for their past achievements in this area. With this new recognition and admittance, many debates and problems have arisen. One of the most common debates surrounds the idea of women in combat positions. Others include the issue of pregnancy, housing, and the physical requirements in order to serve. One problem that has arisen is that of the sexual harassment and rape of some women soldiers.
Myre, Greg. "Women In Combat: 5 Key Questions." NPR. N.p., 24 Jan. 2014. Web. 15 Apr. 2014. .
We live in a time where women can run for president and leave the house instead of staying home as a housewife. Women are competing in the Olympics and becoming cops. So the question is, “should women be allowed in combat?” Women have been in combat since the late 1700s so why not let it stay that way. Women should be allowed in combat because they are already serving in combat. Research from the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services (DACOWITS) shows that a positive impact was resulted from women who contributed to combat in Iraq (Women Should be…). However, women shouldn’t be allowed in combat not because of their gender but because they aren’t capable of keeping up with combat tasks. This is shown by the physical traits of an average woman. Women in combat have lower physical strength than the average man (Donelly). In this paper we will find out whether or not women should be allowed to be in combat and how capable they are of being in combat.
Becraft, Carolyn J. “ A Case for Women in Combat.” U.S Army Command and General Staff
The problem of women fighting in combat along with their male counterparts is not a one-sided problem. Elizabeth Hoisington has earned the rank of Brigadier General in the U.S. Army, leads the Women’s Army Corps and believes that women should not serve in combat because they are not as physically, mentally, or emotionally qualified as a male is and that ...
“Women in Combat”. New York Times” (2012): Global Issues in Context. Web. 25 Feb. 2014.
“Out here, there is no male gender and no female gender,” says Staff Sgt. Vincent Vetterkind, a squad leader of a mixed-gender combat unit. “Our gender is soldier” (Nordland). Until recently, combat had been widely considered a “male only” activity. Despite this notion that men are better suited to combat than women, women have always played a significant role in war. With advancements in technology, and the need for more combat soldiers because of the global war against terrorism, women, more than ever, are needed in the military.
The United States military views its diverse force as one of its greatest assets. Senior Air Force leaders recognize the monumental contributions both men and women make in support of their country daily. Americans serving in any branch of service know it is not a nine-to-five job but rather a calling. It is about being a part of the Profession of Arms. Airmen are warriors. The third verse of the Air Force Airman’s Creed states, “I am an American Airman, Guardian of Freedom and Justice, My Nation’s Sword and Shield, its Sentry and Avenger. I defend my country with my Life” (Huguley, 2009, p.1). The word “Airmen” is gender neutral in the creed; yet, women who want to serve in combat roles are still denied the privilege. Now is the time for the all military branches of service to change both their views and policies regarding women in combat. This paper will explore the need for the military to change its views on women serving in combat roles, the arguments both for and against the change, and recommendations on how the change is a positive improvement for the Air Force.
Musgrave, Jane. “Do Women Belong in combat?” Proquest. CMG corporate services. 25 January 2013. Web. 10 March 2014.
In 1994 Secretary of Defense Les Aspen set in place a policy barring women from direct ground combat positions. That policy, which is still in effect today was based on a study done by an all male committee that looked more at social biases in determining it than at the facts needed to make such a policy. If that committee however would have looked at 3 areas of study and placed themselves in an unbiased state, they would have been able to make a policy that was supported by facts and figures and not by views and beliefs.
Women have been in the military, or associated with combat for decades. “The most famous example of the ability of a woman to not only be involved in combat but to lead forces is that of Joan of Arc's legendary battles leading the French army when she was just a teenager.”(Gerber 1) Women have been involved in espionage and even posed as male soldiers during the Civil War. Conflicts such as, WWI, WWII, Panama, and as recent as our current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan women have served with distinction in many ways. In our most recent conflict, over 100 military women have given the ultimate sacrifice. Today with changes in our society and the global environment in which we live two controversial arguments arise concerning women in combat. Basically the debate whether or not women should be allowed to participate in direct combat or not. As our society and cultural beliefs change so does what we except as social norms. Both sides of this argument bring many reasons for and against allowing women to participate in direct combat. Taking into account both views of this controversy it will show, that not only a social change has occurred, but the dynamics of the battlefield has in fact already placed female service members into direct combat.
"Update: Women in the Military." Issues and Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 29 May 2007. Web.
Occupations in the military that directly interact with hostile forces have been closed to the female military population. A revision of the policy which prevented women from applying to direct combat military occupations, commonly referred to as an MOS, has opened all MOS’s to anyone regardless of gender. This raised concern among the leadership in the Marines Corps. Prior to this decision the Marine Corps conducted and experiment to examine the effect of females being integrated into combat occupations and whether the effectiveness of the marine corps combat capabilities are comprised, realized little change, or experience an increase. With use of the results of the experiment and other data collected regarding this matter recommendations
The rule banning women from combat is an unjustifiable form of gender discrimination and is ethically violating equal opportunity across Americas fighting force. Gilbert (2012) recognizes that when using the fairness and justice approach it requires treating similarity situated people in similar ways (p 109). The US military just recently allowed the idea of women in combat and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta was the individual to break this barrier. Within a long stretch of different Secretary’s during our current Presidents term, it was only an idea that was never acted upon. The Secretary stated in 2013 “If they’re willing to put their lives on the line, then we need to recognize that they deserve a chance” (Armor, 2013). But senior leaders