Women In Science Dbq

791 Words2 Pages

The Scientific Revolution marked a major shift in Western thought between the 1500s and 1700s. Modern science emerged as a way of gaining true knowledge about the natural world. During the time, science was a field dominated by men. Women were believed to be incapable of anything outside their domestic sphere. There was a social stigma regarding women in science. Society had varying reactions toward women working in the sciences, the majority of which were negative. However, some were accepting of women and their contributions to science. The Scientific Revolution had little impact on the way society viewed women. Women continued to be subject to restrictive gender roles. Women in science were commonly discriminated against by men because …show more content…

Female scientists such as Maria Merian and Marquise Emilie du Chatelet had an impact on western science, demonstrating how women were capable of contributing to the sciences despite society’s opinions. Merian published her book Wonderful Metamorphoses and Special Nourishment of Caterpillars during a time when women were criticized for publishing books and demonstrates how society was not able to completely repress women in science (Doc 5). Marquise Emmilie du Chatelet’s letter to the Marquis Jean Francois de Saint-Lambert also demonstrates how women refused to be repressed by society. She refuted his reproach of her translating Newton’s Principia, a translation so thorough it is still used today (Doc 11). Some men in the sciences also gained a respect for women and their contributions. Not all men at the time believed women were incapable of learning at a university level like Junker did. Gottfried Leibniz, a German mathematician, even went as far as to state “women of elevated mind advanced knowledge more properly than do men.” As a philosopher Leibniz likely thought beyond society’s opinions, which is why he did not conform (Doc 7). Johannes Hevelius and Gottfried Krich disregarded the notion that collaborating with women was seen as embarrassing, and both collaborated with their wives (Doc 4 and Doc

Show More
Related

  • Descartes Meditations On First Philosopher: Margaret Cavendish

    1432 Words  | 3 Pages

    A female philosopher was rare in the seventeenth century. A female in the Royal Society was even rarer. Margaret Cavendish was both. Margaret Cavendish was born Margaret Lucas. The name change was a result of her marriage to William Cavendish, the Duke of Newcastle. It was difficult for a woman to have writings published in the seventeenth century. Cavendish was able to publish some works on her own but her husband’s influence gave her the opportunity to publish many more works. Her husband also put her in close proximity with very influential philosophers and scientists of the time such as Hobbes and Boyle. Thinkers such as Hobbes and Boyle were not willing correspond to Cavendish directly since she was a women, and at the time correspondence

    Read More

  • African American Contributions in Science

    3146 Words  | 7 Pages

    Rossiter, Margaret W. (1982). Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press

    Read More

  • Race for the Double Helix: An Analysis

    2257 Words  | 5 Pages

    Rosalind Franklin: Seeing a woman as a scientist during this time is somewhat rare, so the fact that she has taken up this profession show that she is persistent, dedicated, and smart. The only problem is that she is undervalued because of her gender. She is also very quiet and reserved because she’s in a different country.

    Read More

  • Feminist Critique Calkins

    638 Words  | 2 Pages

    It matters who the makers of scientific knowledge are because their background knowledge, values, and concepts determine their choices about what they investigate and observe. The Feminist Critique is the argument among feminist scientists and philosophers that the lack of diversity among scientists is responsible for biases in the natural and social sciences (Barker & Kitcher, 2014). In the 20th century, scientists realized that they were not as objective as they thought, which lead to this idea.

    Read More

  • The Scientific Revolution and The Enlightenment

    1738 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Scientific revolution in the 16th and 17th centuries changed the way that people views the world. Scientific philosophers such as Galileo and Descartes threw out the old teachings of the church and challenged them with new ways of thinking. These men sought to prove that rational thought could prove the existence of God. They also challenged that it was an understanding of a series of rational thoughts, not faith, would bring understanding of how the world worked. Traditional ways of thinking were ultimately challenged by logical and sensible rationale.

    Read More

  • Why Are There So Few Women In Science Essay

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Now many people accept the fact that women are just as good as men at math and science but that wasn’t always the case. Eileen Pollack in her article “Why are there still so few women in science” describes how when she was in school she wanted to learn calculus and other science subjects but her principle told her that “girls never go on in science and math”. This will discourage many young women that wish to pursue a

    Read More

  • Malala Yousafzai: The Inequality Of Women, Women And Women?

    1065 Words  | 3 Pages

    Women can be just as smart as men yet people think otherwise. Many women have discovered amazing things but unfortunately, some don't get credit for it. Rosalind Franklin is a scientist and she is one of the many examples of these. At the age of 27, she became an X-ray Crystallographer. She used to research on X-ray diffraction images of proteins, lipids and other biological substances. When she turned 31, she started researching on DNA. Soon she produced an image known as photo-51, which is one of the most significant events in the history of biology. But one day she left all of her notes and X-ray photos in the lab and went to take a break. While she was gone her colleague Maurice Wilkins took her important photos and notes and gave them to two scientists named Francis Crick and James Watson which was crucial for discovering DNA’s double helix structure. Rosalind had not realized her work was being used and she soon she died of ovarian cancer which is due to taking too many X-rays. Four years after her death James and Francis had won the Nobel Prize for discovering the structure of DNA. But Maurice, James, and Francis did not give any credit to Rosalind and so they got credit for her work. Luckily Francis wrote a secret memoir based on what they did and how they used her work and thanks to that we found out the true story behind the discovery of the structure of DNA. This story

    Read More

  • Bill Nye The Science Guy: Female Role Models

    1914 Words  | 4 Pages

    In recent years, there has been an obvious push to encourage women to pursue majors and careers in STEM fields. Scholarship initiatives are given and supporting communities are being built. However, a problem persists at the societal level – people still do not see women to be scientists. Growing up, we watched "Bill Nye the Science Guy"; now, we watch Neil deGrasse Tyson. In textbooks we are taught about Einstein, Tesla, and Newton - there are few if any female scientist role models. The stereotype persists and is ingrained deep into our society. Society perceives the role of a scientist as a masculine and male role.

    Read More

  • Gender Differences and the Threat of Gender Stereotype in Science Education

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    “It is argued that the social construction of science as ‘masculine’ discourage girls from participating in science by posing the risk of pressure to themselves—as more masculine and less feminine than their peers (Breakwell, 2003, p. 437).”

    Read More

  • Gender And Gender In Gender By Wade And Ferree

    1313 Words  | 3 Pages

    Under closer inspection we are able to come together and fight the inequality that has been a part of our society for generations. Feminism brings to light the discrimination that has become the norm and calls for change. For example, Ben A Barres discusses in Commentary Does Gender Matter, the idea that women are “innately” less capable of doing things such as math and science. “Last year, Harvard University president Larry Summers suggested that differences in innate aptitude rather than discrimination were more likely to be to blame for the failure of women to advance in scientific career.” This sort of backwards thinking has set women back generations and is to blame for the lack of women in STEM fields. Barres also discusses how before he transitioned to a man, his work as a women in science was taken much less seriously and he was less respected. After the transition it was assumed that he was indeed a better scientist simply because he was a man. This sort of double standard and bias with women in these fields has led to such

    Read More

  • Emilie Du Ch�telet: Women And The Scientific Revolution

    566 Words  | 2 Pages

    For women, there seemed to be no Scientific Revolution. When men studied female anatomy, spoke of female physiology, or spoke of the female role in procreation, they ceased to be scientific. They suspended all reason and would not accept

    Read More

  • The Impact of the Scientific Revolution

    1497 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Scientific Revolution was the new era of scientific beliefs. There is a misconception of the term revolution because revolution means that it was a rapid process. The scientific revolution however was not a rapid process and involved several scientists throughout a wide array of time. Since 1800, one of accomplishment. The history of the scientific revolution was concluded by the early years of the nineteenth century. The Italian Renaissance began in the early 1500’s. Scholars, mathematicians, physicians everywhere measured their own attainments by Italian standards; The Italian universities, and the Italian printing house. During the 1500’s, people believed that science and thought were important but once they studied this concept. They never discussed it again. By the 1600’s and 1700’s, secure thoughts of science and religion became contradictory. Scie...

    Read More

  • Women And Science 1988 Reflective Essay

    107 Words  | 1 Pages

    For many years, we’ve read newspaper articles and books all on women not being equal to their partners and being subjected as second-class minority. “All across Europe from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries these women found fascination in the natural science”. After reading “Women and Science,1988” I was would say it was interesting to read because I finally get to read about women and them enjoying what they like to and, on the other hand doing what men do. Coming up with their own knowledge observing many different things. I found that there was a lot of strength and courage that had to do with

    Read More

  • Equality for Women in Education

    1297 Words  | 3 Pages

    http://womeninscience.history.msu.edu/Object/C-46-1/institutions-de-physique-1740--/. Women in Science (Institutions de Physique) Women and the Paris Academy of Science. Vesna Petrovich. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/30053914?uid=3739832&uid=2134&uid=2477106767&uid=2&uid=70&uid=3&uid=2477106757&uid=3739256&uid=60&sid=21103078775477

    Read More

  • The Impact of the Scientific Revolution on Society and Religion

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over the course of the years, society has been reformed by new ideas of science. We learn more and more about global warming, outer space, and technology. However, this pattern of gaining knowledge did not pick up significantly until the Scientific Revolution. In the sixteenth and seventeenth century, the Scientific Revolution started, which concerned the fields of astronomy, mechanics, and medicine. These new scientists used math and observations strongly contradicting religious thought at the time, which was dependent on the Aristotelian-Ptolemy theory. However, astronomers like Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, and Newton accepted the heliocentric theory. Astronomical findings of the Scientific Revolution disproved the fact that humans were the center of everything, ultimately causing people to question theology’s role in science and sparking the idea that people were capable of reasoning for themselves.

    Read More

More about Women In Science Dbq

Open Document