How Is The Rule Of Law Compared To The Merchant Of Venice

1268 Words3 Pages

The world of William Shakespeare was drastically different from what it is today in multiple aspects. The law, social order, how people carried themselves and helped others are just a few examples of how society in general has changed. Shakespeare shows this in The Merchant of Venice, by inserting the rule of law in society and how it affected certain groups in ways that contrast with how society is in modern times. According to Bruce Frohnen in Lawless America: What Happened to the Rule of Law, the rule of law can defined as public order that is used to control the actions of others whether it be justified or not and enforced consistently. He goes on to say that although the law is supposed to be applied to men in an equal manner, it isn’t. …show more content…

In The Merchant of Venice, Shylock uses the rule of law to gain from Antonio what he had due: a pound of his limited flesh. However, even when Antonio was able to repay more than he had borrowed, Shylock’s mind had already bypassed that for a bloodier and extreme punishment: a pound of flesh. He used the rule of law for his own means, even though it was not strictly necessary and the courts had hesitated on granting him his rights. This goes to show how the rule of law can be exploited in The Merchant of Venice and in Shakespeare’s …show more content…

Shylock knows that he is entitled to usury under the Torah and Venice’s protection, but instead decides that he will not use it to try and change opinions of himself in their minds. He uses his refusal to change their opinion of him, but instead decides on a pound of flesh because that was such a distant possibility. Antonio sees this and states that he is growing kind, like a Christian. In the end, that is what Antonio required of

Open Document