preview

Will the Earliest Hominid Please Standup?: Evoultion Exposed

Good Essays
Will the Earliest Hominid Please Stand Up?

Evolution Exposed

Evolution and religion has been a disputable discussion over the decades. Religious believers simply discarded the idea that humans have came from swinging monkeys. Although it is a scientific theory, it is backed up by the heavy weight of scientific evidence. The first thing that one might consider is that religion is composed by thousands of individual memes, which supports myths, moralities, and complex ideas or memeplexes, which will never guarantee its authenticity. One can speculate over the idea of evolution and religious reasoning on how humans came about, but might only develop shaky synthesis and finally conclude the problem insoluble. Besides, at one time the world virtually believed that sun revolves around earth, or the earth is flat, and both are proven very wrong. Evolution is validated through solid scientific specimens and fossils, countless observations, studies and theories.

There are numerous myths when it comes to human evolution. According to the Ian Tattersall and Nile Eldredge, who published The Myths of Human Evolution in 1982, the oldest myth there by far is as follows: man, whatever his resemblance to animals may be, is something special, something above the animal realm (19). This myth comes in many guises. Societies, from the earliest records right down to the present, have tended to look upon themselves as people, not mammals. It is believed by some that our race shall not be degraded down as animals, and that God created human as its own race. To argue that man is not a creation of God, rather than a product from the process of evolution, is considered a distraught to the religious society. This debate brings us to Creationism...

... middle of paper ...

...
The closest known live species to us are the chimpanzees. Have you ever looked deep in its eyes and get a powerful, complex, or murky reaction? This ambiguity makes it very frustrating that the chimpanzee can’t articulate his state of mind to us, or answers our questions. Even with all its physical differences, if he could only talk, he would be considered one of us. It has been recognized from ancient times that language defines us humans and nothing else. Indeed, the Scottish jurist James Burnett, Lord Monboddo, anticipated evolutionary thought as early as the 1770s when he suggested that the acquisition of language was the only key feature that had levered humankind away from the “lower” animals: an intuitively attractive notion that has been revisited by numerous thinkers twice, according to the author of Masters of the Planet, Ian Tattersall (prologue).
Get Access