Wilders´ Our Town and Fugard¨s Master Harold and the Boys

1047 Words3 Pages

When we remember an event from our past, is it not true that much of what we recall is a description of that event based on how it made us feel? That event had an effect on how we felt at the time, and what we describe when recalling that event is the sentiment, idea or feeling we experienced as a result of the event. In the end, the effect of what happened is what we deem important to us. However, think for a moment about any such event in your life. Is it possible to accurately describe that event without including details of where and when it occurred? Likely not, since a great deal of what we rely on for our experience, in and out of the moment, is our physiological and psychological state at that specific time. Furthermore, since humans are so dependent on sensory stimuli, how can it be said that setting doesn’t play some role in influencing how we feel about an event? For similar reasons, playwrights have been relying on the settings of their works to aid in the conveyance of specific ideas for as long as theater has existed. Thornton Wilder’s Our Town and Athol Fugard’s Master Harold… and the Boys are plays that could not be more different in the themes they address, but deal with comparable techniques in settings and the effects of each. While Fugard’s play is a scathing and hopeless description of the influence of apartheid South Africa on the personal relationships of men, Wilder’s play contains a hopeful exhortation to live lives in ways that maximize involvement, engagement, and happiness. Despite these differing themes, each playwright, through the construction of his play, makes deliberate use of setting to help enforce each play’s respective ideas. Wilder accomplishes this primarily through a deliberately constructe...

... middle of paper ...

...and leaves back into the rain before the play ends. This technique is meant to represent that the problems discovered between the three in the Tea Room are going to continue to in a seemingly routine way unless something is done.

In each play, the respective playwrights used the setting to effectively enforce certain ideas conveyed by the work. While Wilder accomplishes this through a deliberately constructed artificial world filled with the appearance of life – a pantomime of reality – Fugard enforces the strong emotions and deeply embedded fears of his characters as much through the setting as through their interactions within the setting itself. In a world in which we rely on a recollection of our past through sensory stimuli, and our metaphysical reactions to it, both plays make effective use of setting to more effectively convey the ideas presented in each.

Open Document