Why Oregon Needs Sobriety Checkpoints

920 Words2 Pages

DUI is the abbreviation of driving under the influence that police officers use when charging drivers that are guilty of driving under the influence. Although many DUI cases are linked to driving under the influence of alcohol there are many other substances that can impair a driver’s ability to drive safely. DUI’s account for numerous incidents from reckless driving to fatal deaths. Many of these incidents could have been prevented if sobriety checkpoints were being conducted during that time frame. Many people who drive under the influence forget that a DUI charge is a criminal charge and one is convicted with a felony under these charges. In Oregon, sobriety checkpoints are illegal under the state constitution. For this reason, year after year there has been an increase in DUI cases in which some have led to death. Sobriety checkpoints have been proven to reduce DUI incidents and accidents because people become more aware of the consequences of driving under the influence. Allowing Oregon to conduct sobriety checkpoints will make it safer for drivers because it prevents tragedies from occurring, and can reduce crime rates in the area due to police presence in the neighborhoods.
According to the article, "State Estimates of Drunk and Drugged Driving," from 2006 to 2009, Oregon was named one of the top ten states to have highest rates in drugged driving. Statistics also show that every 22 minutes someone dies from an alcohol related auto accident. If Oregon police departments had the right to conduct sobriety checkpoints many tragedies could be prevented. It has been proven that driving under the influence impairs the driver’s ability to make the right decisions and that’s why these tragedies occur. It has also been proven th...

... middle of paper ...

... SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
Gabrielsen, Ryan. "Sobriety Checkpoints Are Profitable but Do Not Prevent Drunk Driving." Drunk Driving. Ed. Stefan Kiesbye. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2011. At Issue. Rpt. from "Car Seizures at DUI Checkpoints Prove Profitable for Cities, Raise Legal Questions." California Watch. 2010. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 20 Feb. 2014.
Hingson, Ralph. "Prevention of Drinking and Driving." Alcohol Research & Health. Winter 1996-1997: 219-226. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 22 Feb. 2014.
Kanable, Rebecca. "Driving home a message: DUI is a serious crime, and prevention and enforcement efforts need improvement." Law Enforcement Technology May 2005: 18+. Business Insights: Essentials. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
"State Estimates of Drunk and Drugged Driving." The NSDUH Report. 31 May. 2012: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 19 Feb. 2014.

Open Document