Throughout this essay, I would like to critically examine the essence and worth of an employee in any business firm. An employee is any other human being who works for his or her employer in order to earn a living and satisfy his personal wants. Black’s law dictionary defines an employee “as a person who works in the service of another person under an express or contract of hire, under which the employer has the right to control the details of work performance.” An employee is regarded as a firm’s biggest asset, maybe not in reality but as far as benefits are concerned. An investment (salary) made to hire an employee gives a business much more return than a fixed asset might give. An owner of a firm can direct an employee, but not a machine, he can instruct an employee, but not a raw material. An employee thus works according to the whims and fancies of his employer, which establishes a direct relation between the employee and the management.
Any business requires a certain number of employees, in order to complete all its work with thoroughness and efficiency. Some firms need less number of skilled employees, whereas other firms need a larger quantity of employees, whether skilled or not.
An employer appoints his employees after detailed investigation and speculation about the applicant’s qualifications, achievements, work experience, etc. Neither would a businessman would want his employees to be under qualified for the job nor incapable to live up to the job’s expectations.
However, in today’s world, the level of competition has made it difficult for an employee to always get what he may deserve or want. Thus, there is always dissatisfaction among the non-appointed employees. When employees do not get jobs pertaining to their ...
... middle of paper ...
...anagement Tips. Harvard Business Press Books.
• Lilly M. Berry (1998). Psychology at work. Singapore. McGraw Hill. Second edition, pp. 269-274.
• Locke, E.A. (1976) The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago, Rand McNally.
• Meaning of productivity. Available at: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/productivity.html. [Accessed 1st January 2014]
• Parbudyal Singh and Natasha Loncar. (2010) Relations Industrielles (Industrial Relations). 65, No. 3 pp. 470-490.
• Steven Brown and Son Lam. (2009). Do Satisfied Employees mean satisfied Customers? 23 Issue 1, p.76-77.2p.
• Zach Bulygo. Inside Google’s Culture of Success and Employee Happiness. Available at: http://blog.kissmetrics.com/googles-culture-of-success/ [Accessed 3rd January 2014]
As stated by Dessler (2011) selection of the right employees is imperative for numerous reasons. These reasons can include the knowledge that organizations performance is contingent on its subordinate’s ability. Moreover, it should be common knowledge that employees with the reliable skills and characteristics will perform better for the company. On the other hand, employees who lack those skills or who are slacker will not perform efficiently, and the organization’s performance will suffer (Dessler, 2011).
To be satisfied with one’s job, they must have optimistic feelings surrounding the job they are in, along with the physiognomies associated with it (Kroeger, Thuesen, Rutledge, 2002, p. 83). Not every single part of a job is always desirable, however, if the majority of responsibilities adequately challenge and stimulate, the job will, more often than not, satisfy the employee (Robbins, Judge, 2009, p. 84).
While motivational and job satisfaction theories can help employers or leaders to gauge what motivates their employees, it is impossible for them to be used to explain all motivating factors. By analyzing these theories, it is possible to understand their basic concepts, and see how they can be an advantage in motivating their employees to the best possible outcome for the
A successful company not only because of the employer, employee is the majority reason to build the success. A company can’t operate without employee. Employee is the brain of the comp...
The duo further argue that incentives have been found to be the one of the means through organizations can adopt to motivate and increase their workers performance. This meams that organizations put in place monetary and non-monetary incentives to appeal to their employees to perform more. As adopted from the Pattanayak (2005, p 564), benefits are further classified into monetary incentives, tangible monetary incentives and intangible non-monetary. In essence, employees generally become happier when they get a better working conditions and benefits. As cited in Sempane, Reigner and Roodt (2002 pg 23), Locke once said “job satisfaction is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job and job experiences”. And Linz (2002) job satisfaction is influenced by attitudes toward work and organizational
...ing vacancies. At the same time, organizations such as a 200 bed hospital should prevent their company from becoming homogenous and stagnate. External candidates should not just be recruited to file entry level positions; they should be recruited to file high level positions when experience and qualifications are needed and it is absence within the organization.
After the end of the Industrial Revolution, large corporations were beginning to grow in size and power in order to satisfy what seemed the endless demands for new goods and services. As corporations and labor forces grew, there was a need to develop a more systematic study of organization and management, known as management theory, the significant being Frederick Taylor's Principles of Scientific Management which involved the development of training workers through special incentives and compensation (Boone p.33). In general, early management scientists tended to believe that there was a single way to organize companies and manage employees. By the beginning of the 20th century, there were initial attempts for launching a systematic and scientific study of management; by the 1950's, there were multiple books and articles focused on organization and management theory. Since then, a number of new paradigms, or models, concerning employee motivation and employee-employer relationships have aroused influencing the basic principles of modern management theory.
It is well established reality that organisations in the world today can no longer survive without focusing on their employees. If they have to be at the competitive edge they have to invest in human resource, and placing their employees on top priority. This notion has lead to the strategies that, most organisations are pursuing through employee management. To achieve the optimum performance from employees organisations must motivate their employees, and have to engage them in activities that will benefit and help employees in achieving their predetermined goals and objectives. In order to achieve this, it is imperative for managers to set in motion work conditions that will help employees to achieve satisfaction of their job, low turnover and absenteeism rate and promoting the environment that promotes the organizational commitments and organizational citizenship behavior. Job satisfaction has been identified as a major requirement for organisations which aim to achieve excellence in their operations. Armstrong (2003) refers to job satisfaction as the attributes and feelings people have about their work. By extension, job satisfaction will mean positive or favourable attitudes towards one’s job whilst a negative or unfavourable attitude indicates job dissatisfaction.
In many organisations, managers and bosses have found it a struggle implementing successful strategies to improve job satisfaction and productivity among its employees. While dealing with unproductive, unmotivated and unsatisfied employees, there is an increased risk for turnover, which can be prevented. The risk of high turnover is a problem to workplaces as turnover has been proven to ‘take its toll’ on productivity as it disrupts current projects and increases workloads for other employees. It also has a negative impact on team cohesion (Patrick and Sonia, 2012). Job satisfaction is one’s general attitude to the job, and higher the job satisfaction, the more likely he/she will hold a positive attitude towards their job (De Menzes, 2011). De Menzes (2011) believes that employees who are satisfied with their jobs are likely to be more committed to their organisation and be more productive. People are significantly more productive when they are content and achieving individual and organisational goals are able to be fulfilled in a work environment where employees feel happy and motivated. Interventions which can be used to improve job satisfaction and productivity to decrease rates of turnover and unmotivated employees include an increase in workplace training, as well as performance pay.
In this section it describes the main ideas included in thesis report of the research. These ideas are Job Satisfaction, Performance and Organizational Rewards. It is the common explanation that Job Satisfaction is an mind-set to work. Moreover, Job Satisfaction is an emotional or affective reaction to many features of one’s career. An individual with an increase rank of Job Satisfaction contains optimistic behavior to his or her profession, whereas a human being who is discontented with his or her work contains pessimistic behavior about the work. Luthans (1985) states a complete meaning specified by Locke. A pleasant or affirmative affecting condition
Nowadays, job satisfaction among employees arouses companies concern. Many companies are eager to improve working performance and motivate employees by rating employees’ job satisfaction. Job satisfaction shows an employee or individual’s reaction to his or her work environment. For example, an individual’s psychological responses to his/her job or the level of contentment a person feels regarding his or her work. However, it is found that the individual turnover may not be directly proportional to one’s job satisfaction. The job satisfaction/turnover literature indicates that individuals who experience relatively low job satisfaction tend to change work positions. Because when one is unsatisfied with one’s job, he/she would tend to change the job. If one keeps working in unsatisfied work environment, his psychological feeling towards the job would remain low. Needless to say, some individuals experience relatively high job
For example, Hopkins defined problem satisfaction as the fulfillment or satisfaction of certain needs that were associated with one’s study ” Specter defined job satisfaction, in plain words, as “the extent to which people like their chore ”. Job satisfaction has been defined as a positive orientation course of an individual toward the work role, which he or she is presently occupying an assortment of component can influence a single level of occupation gratification. Some of those factors include pay grade, the process of promotion, workings conditions, leadership, sociable relationship, and the job itself. Job satisfaction is defined as the pleasurable emotional state resulting from the appraisal of a mortal ’s task as achieving or facilitating the individual’s values. Both satisfaction or dissatisfaction are seen as a function of perceived relationship between what an individual wants from his or her task and what that individual perceive it as offering or entailing. Thus, “job satisfaction is an attitude which reflects the degree to which an individual is satisfied, gratified, or fulfilled in his or her work or job” (Sharma, Verma, Verma, & Malhotra, 2010, p. 349). Overall, job satisfaction is a multidimensional
Staying ahead of the competition and increasing profits are the fundamental objectives for every organization. However, many firms today continue to invest extensively in business development activities and less on employee productivity. This mindset ignores the firm’s chief asset and its core foundation, its workforce.
...onship between the employer and the employee. Employers who recognize this and proactively use strategies to promote employee involvement and fair employment practices will be likely to reap the organizational rewards of doing so.
John W. Budd & Devasheesh Bhave (2006). Sage Handbook of Industrial and Employment Relations. Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota. Chapter 5.