Why Is Hunting Important Essay

In regions plagued with overpopulation, food is becoming scarce forcing animals to scavenge for plants that they would not normally eat. This unnatural burden on the food chain has a potential for disaster for the wildlife, in a region, as a whole. To find an example of a heathy ecosystem one could look towards the Ireiques, a native American tribe native to Oklahoma. With the existence of an extensive hunting program, allowing hunting in and out of season holds deer to a reasonable and healthy population ... ... middle of paper ... .... For each animal shot it costs around $200 dollars. The meat is then donated to charitable organizations to help feed the needy (Budiansky).

These groups believed that hunting is damaging to animal populations. They see animals being killed and can’t possibly see any benefits of this. However, they are overlooking the many benefits of hunting. One of the main things they overlook is the financial support hunting offers for conservation. For example, In North Carolina hunting provides 70% of the funding for conservation and wildlife management programs.

These animals uproot trees, eat any and all food they can find, and dig up burrows of other animals the live in t... ... middle of paper ... ...nters want a guide that is local and knows the land and animals so hunters are willing to spend a lot of money in order to have a successful hunting trip. Many local town governments and cities rely on the taxes from hunting to stay alive. There are even states that rely on hunting for their tourism and tax revenue such as Kansas and Montana. Both of these states have less tourism than most other states and need hunting to generate money. “The total impact that year (2005) was nearly $66.8 million from visitors only in Montana for hunting only” (Burwell 1).

Hunting also has it’s economic advantages bringing in 1.6 billion dollars to this country every deer, duck, bear, etc. season. (25 Reasons Why Hunting is Conservation) With around 6% of the population in this country avid into the outdoors (Conservation Force), this nation will receive the money that those hunters paid for licenses and other such federally funded tags and ... ... middle of paper ... ...o supports the outdoors with funds but it is more of a club that unites avid hunters. Annual contests and fundraisers are held to raise money for their cause but this club is more lenient than the NRA and other such high power clubs. One of the most helpful ones is the U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance.

Many families do not have the money to afford meat now days. We usually try to kill the legal amount of deer. When we do that, we get plenty of meat for ourselves and we are able to it to families in need. Ronnie Ritter, president of Arkansas Hunters Feeding the Hungry, is the link between successful hunters and families who cannot afford meat. He spends most of his time visiting with meat processors and hunters because if it wasn’t for them, he would not be in business.

Hunting is not inhumane or against any rules. Human beings have been hunting since our earliest existence; it is a fundamental part of our nature. People think hunters are predators and that we kill animals just to kill them and leave them there to rot. Hunters are considered predators, but we don’t just do it to kill, we do it, mainly, because wild game meat is healthier ("Brazosport College Library Research Database Access"). Wild game is one of the most common and, for the most part, the healthiest and most delicious meat, compared to farm raised animal meat, such as cow, pig, and sheep.

Both sides of the argument have very valid reasons on why they chose a certain side, but hearing from both sides, it could be hard to choose one side completely. It’s a topic that’s easy to look at in many different perspectives. The first view of the controversy states that sport hunting causes suffering, painful deaths for animals, causes imbalances in nature, destroys property and injures or kills hunters or... ... middle of paper ... ...on to hunt them as much as they’d like. It is not affecting the population at all. Natural habitats are changed to fit the needs of deer to make unbelievably high population numbers.

You track deer down to a science on when and where the best time and place to hunt them is. There are other benefits of killing animals besides the fun and rush of adrenaline people get when doing this activity. Hunting animals provides a lot of cheap meat in your freezer. Without the hunting of animals to help regulate animal population, animals such as squirrels, deer, and alligators would be over running humans more than they are now. Though alligators do not pertain to most areas, the areas they do populate pose a human threat as they live in swamps and rivers around populated areas.

Yes, there are programs which reimburse ranchers for their losses, but the raising calves to cows, feeding them, and immunizing them is more money than one wants to put out for one animal if it isn’t your income. Farmers lose from wolves because their cows, sheep, goats, and dogs get eaten or killed by wolves. For farmers, the money situation is almost as bad as it is for ranchers. Either way wolves infringe on the rights of farmers and ranchers, so they should not be reintroduced into the southwest. Another reason wolves are bad for our society in the southwest, is a good piece of income and food is raised from hunters every year; with wolves being in the wild, hunters would feel afraid to go into the back country looking for a good deer or elk, the best animals would be eaten by wolves thus reducing the number of permits that are being given out, reducing the money generated by hunting permits.

Conservationists and the ranchers that are having financial issues caring for their animals, without utilizing hunting, can take advantage of other resources to gain revenue. The ranch operators need to find alternatives to gain a source of income such as acquiring sponsors, donations, conducting guided tours or perhaps, providing educational programs. There are more humane methods of earning money than the killing of animals. Making use of the public's curiosity and interests is a resourceful tactic that can be very successful and beneficial to the economy. In conclusion, captive hunting ranches exist and seem to thrive especially in the state of Texas.