preview

Why Is Congress Wrong

analytical Essay
517 words
517 words
bookmark

Congress was wrong in approving the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution! Can you imagine getting blamed for starting something when you retaliated? And then getting blamed for something you didn’t even do? I can imagine that and I know I don’t like when it happens to me, so I can very easily see how the whole incident was wrong. There were many major reasons that the whole incident was wrong. First off was Johnson’s standpoint on the whole thing. He firmly believed in stopping the spread of Communism, so he thought by keeping North Vietnam from taking over South Vietnam he would have to find a reason to be able to go to war. When he started trying to find a way he made some mistakes. He made some mistakes because he used “illegally” obtained information …show more content…

In this essay, the author

  • Opines that congress was wrong in approving the gulf of tonkin resolution. they can imagine being blamed for starting something when they retaliated.
  • Analyzes johnson's viewpoint on the whole thing. he firmly believed in stopping the spread of communism, so he would have to find a reason to go to war.
  • Analyzes how the captain and his crew overreacted to the alleged "second" torpedo boat attack 2 days after the first one. they sent a cable back to washington saying they were under attack when they weren't.
  • Explains that mcnamara found out from gen. giap what happened on the day of the alleged second attack.
  • Opines that congress should have taken more time to evaluate the situation and get the facts before jumping to a decision.

McNamara comes out of the meeting and reports that what Giap said was completely unfounded. And that there had to/ must have been an attack that day. So even after the war the U.S. leaders were still saying that there had been an attack that never existed. Finally after all of this is said I cannot for one moment believe that Congress’s was correct and that they should have made a slower decision and found out the truth. From the U.S. escalating the war and starting the whole thing. To the U.S. saying the North Vietnamese had started the war and that there had been a second attack that never happened so that they could have a reason to join in the war. Also if things had been done different a lot of human lives could have been spared, up to a possible 58,000 American lives and 3,200,000 North Vietnamese lives. Since this is how things turned out and that they could have been very different I think that Congress should take more time to evaluate the situation and get the facts before jumping to a decision, and that Congress should keep events like this in mind in similar situations in the

Get Access