Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is a good solution for gun control
Impact of gun control on society
Gun control prevention
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Gun control
The history of firearm dates back to as early as the 10th century AD, right after the Chinese invented black powder. It wasn’t until the 14th century AD that they were brought to Europe and the Middle East. Since then, these weapons have been used for many reasons: to put food on the table, for personal protection, to enforce or defy the law, to defend or acquire territory, and to liberate or to enslave. They have also been used for entertainment purposes, like competitive shootings, or simply for the pure enjoyment of gun collection. Today, Americans own about 265 million guns, and almost half of these weapons are in the hands of just 3% of the population (Jervis, 2016). Gun ownership has become a very controversial topic across the US, especially after the multiple mass shootings that have happened over the past year. The question then arises: should guns be banned? I think
…show more content…
According the Gun Violence Archive, there has been more than 46,000 gun related deaths in 2016, which do not take into consideration the 22,000 people who killed themselves using a firearm (2016). The implication is that, establishing strict gun regulations would limit the public’s access to guns, which in turn would reduce the rate of mortality by firearm. That is because, if criminals and mass shooters have no access to any type of gun, they will have to resort to other types of weapons, like knives, for example. It is a lot harder to cause important damages with a knife than with a gun: guns can kill dozens of people in the matter of seconds, they can be used from a relatively far distance, and it is not easy to escape a bullet, whereas knives cause little damage, the attacker needs to be in proximity of the victim, and it can only hurt one person at a time. Also, taking away guns from citizens would reduce suicides around the US, as suicide by gun is the most common and the most lethal form of
Each person has a different view on the world. If a person is asked about their view on a certain subject, they will likely show support or disdain for the subject. For example, some people believe abortion is morally wrong. Others view abortion as the mother’s choice since she is carrying the child. On the issue of gun control, people are usually either for or against stricter gun laws. Why do people view the world in the way they do? How do people decide what stance to take on an issue? To answer these questions, sociologists look at the sociological perspective which “stresses the social contexts in which people live” and “examines how these contexts influence people’s lives” (Henslin, 2013, p. 4). Furthermore, the sociological perspective
For hundreds of years Americans have been growing up with the notion that it is a right to own a gun. Since the creation of the second amendment, people all over the United States have been able to guns for private use. Guns operated by the public are said to have a variety of uses such as, being able to protect oneself if conflict arises, grants the ability to put food on the table, and are used in competitions shooting targets against other people. But for many people guns have been seen as the root of all evil. Anti-gun users think that guns cause a variety of unexpected and innocent deaths. They also think that there are not enough laws in place that allow just about anyone to purchase a gun. The question of should guns be legal to all citizens has plagued our society. Do you think it is morally right for anyone to arm themselves and use it when they deem it to be necessary? Or do you think that the 2rd amendment seem unnecessary and outdated law that needs to be rewritten? These questions are just two of many that have thrown back and forth between pro-gun and anti-gun users.
Because any confrontation may become fatal with weapons other than concealed handguns, the likeliness that these confrontations have daily deadly outcomes is low, so it is just as implausible that banning handguns will prevent these outcomes. Raven Clabough reports for the New American Magazine, “according to the FBI, more hammers, clubs, and other blunt objects are involved in murders than rifles or shotguns. In 2011, 323 murders were committed with a rifle and 356 with a shotgun, while a staggering 496 were committed with hammers and clubs…Also in 2011, 1,694 people were killed by ‘knives or cutting instruments,’ far more than rifles and shotguns combined,” (Clabough). If taking away American citizens’ right to bear arms, the government should also place a ban on hammers, clubs, and steak knives. These items accumulate more murders than the firearms did. This statement provided by the FBI proves that any confrontation can turn deadly using everyday household items that any person of any age or criminal background has access
In the United States, there is a famous saying to justify gun ownership “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” It is true that the person with the gun is the one who is doing the killing but the gun makes it easier to have a massacre. However guns are useful for police, security, and military so they could protect themselves and everyone around them. Americans are not obsessed with guns; the American people are tired that their 2nd amendment rights are being violated. Police violate the citizen right to bare arm and will detain them. The sell of guns are being banned in some states, which makes it harder for citizen to own a gun. When someone chooses to carry a knife for protection the law will try to violate his or her right.
Some of the reasons for gun control are that it will help the government get a control on us.Hitler in world war 2 used gun control against the jewish people to better control and corral them. Historians have documented most everything about it except what made it so easy to attack the defenseless Jews without fear of resistance. Their guns were registered and thus easily confiscated.(stephen halbrook)If the government started registering guns and know their location left and right they could overthrow us with a flick of their wrist. Imagine your local police coming to your doorstep in your house and taking your only good form of self defense.Then turning right around and kidnapping your children and kids and including yourself.I mean thats what the jews were facing during the holocaust.This is why so people do not support gun control for fear of government taking over us and loss of their guns.also some people use guns to provide food for their family thru the form of hunting.you take away their guns you take away their ability to provide for their family.I believe the government doesn't have a right to take our guns to get a hold on us.But its actually better when the government lets us carry weapons around in our everyday lives.
Should handgun ownership be banned? I don't believe so. You would think America would learn from examples from other countries. When you take away handguns the crime rate rises. American citizens need to know their rights, responsibilities and safety of owning a handgun.
I believe that gun ownership should be completely restricted. Guns only promote violence. Limiting who can buy guns can only do so much. Even running background checks, to determine who would be mentally stable to own a gun would not prevent someone who cannot obtain a firearm himself. “The fact that people with problematic criminal and mental histories can own semi automatic and automatic weapons means that we need more laws passed to limit gun ownership even further.”” Such things would only promote a person to find someone, such as a close relative, to get the the firearm they would choose to have. However, permitting or forbidding guns completely would lead to an excess of problems. We would be left in a situation such that, only law enforcement officials would have all the authority and the weapons to control us more. These facts pose this argument, but it would be in the best interests to ban gun ownership, as crime rate and death rate would both decrease
If someone wanted to kill someone a law would not stop them. Also if someone wanted to get ahold of a weapon then a law would not stop them. One example of someone not caring the murder is against the law was John Wilkes Booth because he murdered Abraham Lincoln. Another example of someone not caring that murder is illegal was Lee Harvey Oswald,he was the murderer on John F. Kennedy. Guns don’t kill people. People are the ones that load the guns not the gun itself. People are the ones who shoot other people the gun does not shoot people. Remember people are the problem not the gun. If everyone owned a gun it would lead to less crimes because people could protect themselves from criminals ("Does Gun Control Reduce"). If everyone had a gun in their homes they could protect their home, also owning a weapon could potentially save their own life, family's lives and maybe even their friends from an
How would you feel if your best friend shot you? BANG! It may sound like a cliche but it is a reality. In a single year there have been over 350 mass shootings . According to a BBC article 60% of the US’s murders are a result of firearms (Guns in the US). Most states’ laws state that handguns can be bought by anyone over the age of 21, but long guns, including assault rifles, the legal age to buy is 18. Thomas Jefferson was quoted saying,“For an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” To almost everyone that makes gun laws seem somewhat reasonable, but do you think we need high magazine assault rifles to protect our homes our ourselves?
“Guns are not the problem. It is us that is the problem” (Kieta Shimizu). On the topic of gun control there are many arguments that can be made for both sides of the coin no doubt. In this essay you will hopefully learn why we do not need gun control in the great country that is The United States of America. Three main topic will be covered the effects of private gun ownership, gun control in society, and guns and their usage. Private gun ownership does not pose a serious threat to society, but provides an effective means of self defense.
Everything what has something to do with guns creates conversation. There is A LOT of controversy, especially between Americans, whether guns should be banned or not. Some Americans are extremely patriotic and think that guns are more than important. Some, on the other hand, think that guns bring nothing more than harm. It is difficult to choose sides when both arguments are as well, or as weakly reasoned.
People have used guns for robbing banks, houses or other people’s valuable things. People have used guns least for good purposes and mostly for bad purposes. On July 13, 2014 a robber robbed a bank and ran away. Police caught him and was taking him to jail but he tries to free himself from their custody. He shot a policeman and that policeman was dead. These guns are not good for American Environment and for its citizens. On June 30, 2010 Wilkinson and Kastler robbed a bank and also were accused of drug delivery. They stabbed the one of the bank worker in order to escape. They were sent to jail and sentenced for four years of prison. In order to save people’s money, banks and other valuable things guns should be banned and only should be allowed
Should guns be banned in the US. Nowadays, guns became popular and common in our community, so is that something good or not. Guns should be illegal because the number of crimes and creminals increased and still increasing. Although, the guns became an easy way for some people to revenge, so having a gun make it very, very easy to do so. For example, if an assailant enterns my house with a gun, I will reach my gun and shoot him ammiditly; in that cause, I will waste someone's live my whole life with emotional and psychological trauma that will potentially scar me for life. So, think with me in this way, without gun control, when an assailant
No guns means less and less murders and that is a good reason to get rid of guns completely. There are countries that have banned the sale and use of guns, and in those countries the murder and accidental death rate is lower than the US. The other side to this is that countries without guns find other ways to kill people. For example Yemen doesn’t use guns, but their death rate are caused by knives. They find other ways to kill each other.
Firearms are a very important and debated subject in today’s news. There are mainly two sides on the debate, for gun control or against it, and both sides have well thought out arguments and statistics to justify their ideas. Firearms were invented after gunpowder in China in the 14th century. Wars were raging and China needed to advance in their technology. Other surrounding countries had archery which was fast and a good defense during war. Therefore when gunpowder was found to be explosive the Chinese put it into bamboo barrels, and were now ahead in the war (Jeff Harder). Firearms have been protecting men, women, and children for years. In wars and in day to day life. Although firearms are dangerous in illegal situations, are a high cause of death, and suicide. Firearms still protect citizens in dangerous situations and have been helping people find food for centuries.