Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
analysis on the first world war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: analysis on the first world war
Why Germany lost the War in 1918
After four years of monotonous stalemate the war was finally over. In
October the German Chancellor appealed to the USA and by 11th November
the armistice was signed in a railway carriage in the French forest of
CompiAgne. An end to the war, which had cost so many lives, was the
only option for a crumbling Germany. This defeat was inevitable from
the outset of 1918 for a number of reasons. They can be split into
three categories; the first being the strikes, rebellions and general
chaos within a tired, hungry Germany, the second are the gains, losses
and mistakes of Germanys military force and the third being the
arrival of the USA on the battlefield and the strength of the British
and French forces.
In 1917 events and uprisings in Russia lead to a potentially crucial
change in the way the war progressed. In November a communist
rebellion led by Lenin and Trotsky overthrew the Provisional
government and by March 1918 the treaty of Brest-Litovsk was signed.
This non-aggression pact between Germany and Russia meant that
Ludendorff could now concentrate his German troops entirely on the
Western border, as Russia was no longer a dangerous threat. In many
ways this is another main reason as to why Germany failed in 1918
because suddenly Germany could focus her whole strength on to the
western borders. The treaty lifted a tremendous weight off Germany's
shoulders and was the beginning spark for Ludendorff's motivation to
push ahead. Brest-Litovsk was signed by Germany ideally to help them
win the war but some Historians would argue that in fact it actually
helped them loose the war.
The USA was a...
... middle of paper ...
...ly would the fear of a revolution be absent and
therefore Ludendorff wouldn't be so pressurised but also the Kaiser
may never have felt that abdication was his last resort and if the
Kaiser hadn't abdicated then maybe the war would have dragged but
because he did the armistice was signed by and eager Ebert who had the
total support of his country.
Some Historians would argue that the failure of the German offensive
was more important because if the offensive had been a success then
not only would there be a change of heart in the people of Germany but
there would be no need for an armistice if Germany had the upper hand.
In conclusion I think that all of these reasons are necessary to the
closure of war and in I am no means discounting other reasons by
saying that the internal collapse of Germany is more important.
Assessment of the Reasons for Allied Victory in 1918 During 1918, the effect of Stalemate along the Western Front saw 4 years of war trying to break it. Ideas and technology were outdated and often tactics were unrealistic. A stretch in German supplies, the intervention of the USA, the strategic strength of the allies along with the deteriorating German homefront effort due to the naval blockade saw the collapse their war effort. From the failure of the Schlieffen Plan due to poor planning and heavy reliance of the 42-day deadline, the German army also had the difficulty of fighting a war on two fronts. These factors reflected poorly on the leadership of the German high commanders.
It may seem like wars start abruptly, with little cause, but usually there is a bigger story. New policies, lack of equality, military influence, and too much government involvement usually stir up the peace initially. These turn the country or area into a ‘powder keg’, ready to explode into war at the smallest spark. Although the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand was the spark of World War I, policies at the time like nationalism and militarism were the underlying causes of the war.
Although Fischer’s thesis was widely accepted, there were people who argued against it. Most Germans had accepted the fact that Germany had caused World War II, but they disagreed with the blame Germany took for World War I. World War I was widely regarded as a war forced upon Germany by its encircling enemies. Critics argue that Fischer’s thesis placed Germany outside the real historical context. It is argued that Germany was not the only aggressive a European nation in the early 20th century, as it was a time when Social Darwinism views of struggle were well-known in Europe's ruling classes. Critics also oppose that in the centuries following Columbus's voyages to America, the Western European countries had already acquired vast overseas colonial
Outbreak of World War I and Germany's Responsibility The War Guilt clause has been called the 'historical controversy par excellence[1]'. At the end of the war article 231 explicitly placed the guilt for 'all loss and damage' of the war on the defeated Germany and her allies. This clause was bitterly denied by Germany and has been a subject of keen debate ever since. The issuing of the 'blank cheque' to Austria in 1914, their strong "will to war", the aggressive
The Impact of the Treaty of Versailles on Germany The Treaty of Versailles was received very badly within Germany. The nation had been blamed entirely for the First World War and had been forced to pay compensation to the allies under the war guilt clause of the treaty of the. The war guilt clauses not only made the Germans accept responsibility for the war, but also cost them dearly. 10% of German lands were lost as a result, all of Germany's overseas colonies were taken away and shared between the allies and a massive 12.5% of the German population found itself living outside of the new German borders. The.
Blaming Germany for the First World War Intro: § Explain topic. Agree partially. Germany mostly responsible however other countries contributed. Para1: § Talk about the balance of power. The alliances.
The general public of Germany had never had any say in political matters; they allowed the Kaiser to make all the decisions regarding themselves and their once-prosperous country. The groups controlling Germany began to change during October and November 1918. More power began to fall into the hands of the people as they realised the blame for their involvement in the war was the Kaiser’s. People such as the armed soldiers, sailors and workers started protesting and going on strike. This was a far cry from before the war, when Germany was wealthy, proud and ambitious. So for a brief period, it seemed that a revolution would take place, with the people of Germany wanting a social and political revolution.
World War II was one of the bloodiest events in the history of the world and it had made Hitler one of the world’s most infamous people ever, but Germany was certainly not the only cause for World War II. The Western European power France provoked Germany to lash out against the rest of the world.
The underlying cause of World War I was the build up of Nationalism, Imperialism, and Militarism in the 1800s. The “three isms” caused this great war due to the outcry in which they caused within the countries and their citizens including military build up, severe nationalism, patriotism, and extending a country 's power and influence through diplomacy or military force.
Treaty of Versailles and Germans In the following essay, I will look at the terms of the Treaty of Versailles that was signed on June 28th1918, by Count Brockdorff (German Delegate) and why the people of Germany resented the treaty, which was made at the Paris Peace Conference, at the Palace of Versailles. Germany was not invited to the conference because the war was fresh in the minds of the' Big 3'' - Lloyd George (G.B.Involved in war throughout Wilson. - Most Powerful country) and Clemenceau (Most of the war fought in France. He was France P.M.)Britain and the U.S.A. were worried about the consequences of punishing Germany's too harshly.
In the midst of great change on the European continent, Germany was left in a position of uncertainty. With the arrival of modernization, the population was looking for order and emotional fulfillment in a fragmented and changing nation.
The defeat of Germany in World War Two was due to many factors. All of these factors were influenced by the leadership and judgment of Adolf Hitler. Factors such as the stand fast policy, Hitler’s unnecessary and risky decision making in military situations, for example when attacking the USSR, and the declaration of war on the US. Plus other factors, like Hitler’s alliance with Italy, despite its obvious weaknesses, and the pursuit of the final solution, can all be attributed to the poor leadership and judgement of the Fuhrer, which would eventually lead to the downfall of the Third Reich.
...tical and economic woes attributed to reunification, Germany would be able to fortify its status as a reunified nation in the years to come.
which would be one of the factors that kept Germany alive in World War II. With
Germany's Objections to the Treaty of Versailles. Subsequent to the German government conceding defeat in World War I. Britain, America and France wrote up a treaty that Germany had no option but to sign it. This treaty was the Treaty of Versailles and was widely considered to be one of the harshest treaties ever written. The The German public obviously had many objections to the terms of the treaty. and this essay will discover what these objections are and how far they are not justified in.