Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Public policies on climate change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Public policies on climate change
Seeing climate change as an emergency doesn't always make people make actions because of many psychological barriers that limit the mitigation of climate change. Frantz and Mayer in their article" The Emergency of Climate Change: Why are We Failing to Take action? "Published in Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (2009) and Gifford in " The Dragons of Inaction. Psychological Barriers That Limit Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation" published in American Psychology (2011), discussed the reasons why the American public are failing to take action to Climate Change even though they know that it is a grave issue. They also offered some suggestions that help in getting over those barriers.
Having a connection to the environment could help a lot in seeing the subtle changes; therefore, it could really help in seeing any emergency that might occur. According to Frantz and Mayer, people who spend more time in the environment are more likely to notice the effects of climate change, and they are more likely to notice changes that occur in the environment in general. They also indicated that they won't only notice the changes in the environment, they will easily seek out information about potential environmental changes which is very promising to notice climate change as an emergency. They also mentioned that because of modern life people do not depend on nature directly for their livelihood and that's because of their jobs that require moving from a place to another, they won't have deep connection to a specific environment, which make noticing climate change really hard. Gifford, agreed with Frantz and Mayer in their belif that a weaker place attachment could be an obstacle to climate-positive behavior. He also wrote that if...
... middle of paper ...
...rriers at the behavioral level, define, observe and record, intervene, test the intervention, and then evaluate the program, create new ways to feed the information back to consumers and citizens, improve understanding of the bases for public support, design and conduct more intervention studies that improve carbon-related behavior choices, and work closely with other disciplines. As Gifford, Frantz and Mayer listed some strategies to overcome barriers they mentioned that because people forget to take appropriate action they suggested reminders as a solution. They also suggested that policies should lay the groundwork for behavior because when policies become normative, they will become less relevant.
Works Cited
the emergency of climate change why are failing to take action the dangerous of inaction psychology barriers that limit the mitigation of climate change
Climate Change is costing the world millions of dollars and is the biggest issue facing society today. Climate change is causing greenhouse gases to build up, ice caps to melt, etc. Some people believe climate change is not a big issue. For instance in the article “Gospel of The Climate Change Deniers” it is stated, “Barton a guy who called Al Gore ‘totally wrong’ about global warming and advised people to get shade to adapt to rising temperatures” (Kroll). Although, this is an appealing mindset, it is illogical because climate change has many more effects than just warmer temperatures. For example, Frank Ackerman: an economist known for his work in environmental economics and Dr. Elizabeth A. Stanton an environmental economist and
Bill McKibben's "The Environmental Issue from Hell" argues that climate change is a real and dire concern for humanity. His essay deals with the methods and persuasive arguments needed to spur American citizens and the government on to change to more eco-friendly choices. The arguments he proposes are based largely upon emotional appeals calling for empathy and shame, and examples of what in our daily lives is adding to the changes we're seeing in the climate.
Just because it is not happening here, it does not mean it is not happening. That is what reporter Elizabeth Kolbert would have said to the entire American population on climate change if she could go back in time. Kolbert, in her New Yorker article “The Big Heat”, argues that Americans have been extremely busy handling insignificant situations happening in their regional level that they have forgotten to deal with the most atrocious social issue of all: global warming.
As cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead once said “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; Indeed it’s the only thing that ever has.” In an excerpt from an essay published in the New York Times Magazine, American public intellectual Michael Pollan reveals his goal to convince the ordinary of citizens America that they are capable of saving the world from climate change and to answer the unappeasable question of “Why bother?”. This inquiry stems from the belief that one person is not capable of making a difference in relation to the larger spectrum of Americans who continue to emit a large amount of C02, increasing the effects of climate change, and destroying the environment. Through the exploration of behavior change, and other personal alternatives aimed to reduce America 's carbon footprint, Pollan aspires to have
In Dale Jamieson’s article “The Nature of the Problem," he thoroughly explains that climate change is a continuing ongoing problem in society. He continues to explain that today’s civilization has done very little, next to nothing to resolve this problem, as it continues to escalate. Firstly, Jamieson argues that the increments of climate change are usually barely noticeable, and even less so because we re-norm our expectations to recent experiences, especially when it comes to “global warming.” Climate change, and Global warming are bound to have, numerous, paradoxical, indirect effects, and many effects on human welfare . These effects are relatively invisible, as these includes the rising of sea levels, increased frequency of droughts, storms,
The first part of this essay discusses what the human species has done to deal with the problem of climate change. While some improvements have been made, the problem has not been addressed aggressively enough to stop the damage. What is amazing about this is the denial of so many people that problems exist. If they do realize the risks, they are simply not taking actions to contain the damage.
To stop the rather scary problem of global climate change dramatic orders would need to be put in place. “We’re talking about the wholesale decarbonization of our country, about removing the fossil fuel base on which our prosperity has so far rested,” and that all seems a bit too complicated (McKibben 501). So instead, it seems a change in attitude is needed. In many cultures, including America’s, it is money over everything and it has always been like that. “If something made the economy…larger, we generally assented,” and that is the problem. Obviously, the reckless attitudes of humans are becoming more and more apparent as our planet plummets deeper into peril. However, maybe just by changing the overall attitude of the population, the results will change too. And in the long run, putting the environment first now will allow the economy to push to the front again.
People need simple and measurable action plans. Without being given a plan for combating climate change, most people end up doing nothing, despite knowing that they should be helping the
This disparity in critical thinking and agreement that climate change has brought about some scientists resisting the idea of or now avowing the idea or the notion that climate change is real, it is happening now or will even continue to be a threat now and in the future. This mindset has impeded some nations from signing the Kyoto Protocol, which binds delegates of the United Nations to abide by a reduction of emissions through their restraint and usage of fossil fuels and the other contributing factors which cause greenhouse
Attention Getter: Our world is always changing. We look out the window, and we see weather change. When we look out long enough, you’ll see the seasons change. Our very planet’s climate is changing, too, but in ways.? We can’t really see but we can feel.
Climate change (global warming) is a problematic issue, and this problem is growing. To make matters worse, this problem is a manifestation of human activities. People’s actions are resulting in devastating impacts to the environment. Unfortunately, not everyone concurs to this reasoning. Even with empirical data presented, there are skeptics who attribute climate change to natural causes rather than man-made causes. In order to prevent global warming from exacerbating, it is crucial for people to understand that climate change is happening; it is changing “even more radically,” (Emanuel 6) than ever, and humanity is the cause.
For centuries, the issue of global warming has been a great concern for citizens in all cultures. Many suggest that becoming environmentally aware is the solution to preventing the constant climate change in our environment. However, individuals relentlessly dismiss the issue by being nonchalant and inconsiderate. Furthermore, going green has generated intense controversy. Some strongly feel that their individual contribution to society is worthless, while others firmly advocate that becoming ecologically aware helps prevent possible changes in the atmosphere, which is caused by global warming. Certainly, by going green, we can conserve energy, reduce health risks, and improve economic efficiency; therefore, lessening our global adversity.
That one recognizes the climate crisis does not mean that you automatically change behavior. The changing lifestyle can be difficult. Many people find it cumbersome to use public transport instead of their own car. It is easy to buy new clothes instead to patch and modify . Sorting of waste also needs an extra effort. But for every action you take after you come a little closer to the goal . The current consumption gives a too large emissions of greenhouse gases.
Being a smart driver helps. What I mean is that if all drivers kept the air in their tires at sufficient levels, NRDC predicts the gasoline usage would come down 2%. Burying cleaner products that support clean energy. Good examples are home appliances. Energy Star is tagged on all the fridges, washing machines, and other appliances to promote clean energy.
Research indicates that people perceived climate changes as a distant threat. People tend to take it as something affects others, happens in future generation and in remote places (Brügger, Dessai, Devinewright, Morton, & Pidgeon, 2015). Liberman and Trope (2008) defined four dimensions of psychological distance, including spatial distance (i.e. near or remote places), temporal distance (i.e. current or future events), social distance (i.e. relatives, acquaintances or strangers), and uncertainty (likelihood or unlikelihood of occurrence). All four dimensions are interrelated. Changing one aspect will result in changing of psychological distance. We will focus on research about spatial distance which is often discussed in this field and has more relevant research. Climate change is considered as spatially distant which means people, at least westerners, consider climate change happens at global level rather than local level, happens in other country or places other than in their own country. From Leiserowitz, Maibach, Roser-Renouf, and Smith (2011), 23% American people think global warming will harm people in developing countries at a great deal, while only 12% think the same-level harm will happen in their own