Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is poverty essay 100 words
What is poverty essay 100 words
Strengths and weaknesses of poverty concept
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In class, we’ve talked a great deal about all of the aspects that underline the concept of poverty. From reading about it in our book, researching online, and grabbing a personal text, I was highly intrigued with the components that make up “the working poor,” it’s actual definition, and so much more.
Before getting into the statistics, a simple definition of “the working poor” is that it is a group of people who spend about twenty-seven weeks or more in a year either working or looking for work, but their incomes fall below the level of poverty (USDAVIS, 2013). With this definition, it is understandable as well as difficult to take in because there are a lot of people that face this, and there are others that are even less fortunate than this. From class notes, in 2010, 2.6 million full-time workers were in poverty. Those workers did dirty work for low pay, no benefits, and there was very little governmental assistance.
From the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2011, the working poor were 7% of the total work force, 13.3% of the overall group were Blacks, 12.9% Hispanics, 6.1% Whites, and 5.6% were Asians. With gender, 8% of them were women, and 6.2% were men. 20.1% had less than a High School diploma, 9.2% for High School graduates, 4.6% with an Associate’s degree, and 2.4% with a Bachelor’s degree or higher. Through demographic research, it is found to be that out of the group, most of the individuals were most likely young; ages 16-19 (11.3%), ages 20-24 (14%) and ages over 65 (1.7%). 14.4% of the working poor population was part-time workers, and 4.2% were full-time. So in 2011, 4.4 million people who usually worked full-time were working poor. Of these, 84% experienced unemployment (39%), involuntary part-time empl...
... middle of paper ...
...oor, but the debate on if “work works” or “work doesn’t work,” inspires me. Even though you are the working poor, “working works” because you are making some type of living and can purchase some items. There are bad days and the good ones. Leary Brock, a former addict and apart of the working poor population states, “There’s a lot of talent that’s been layered over with years of maybe drug abuse or alcohol abuse or physical abuse, no telling what. But the layers have begun to peel off, and…oh, looks like a little diamond under there” (Shipler, pp. 254).
At the end of the day, you just have to take note of your strengths and weaknesses, hope for more, and achieve greatness. Some how, people do find their own source(s) of happiness, but you just have to keep telling yourself, “I can make changes. Or I can make excuses. But I can’t make both” (Shipler, pp. 265).
Dream dwindles to just a whisper of the past. Although there are still many hard working Americans, the success of each individual no longer correlates to the degree of effort that American’s put into their line of work, proving the barriers that separate many from a successful lifestyle. This epidemic is shown in Barbara Ehrenreich’s Nickel
WORKING POOR The economic climate may not look very viable with the historical decline of the union’s position in the labor market. The lack of a survivable wage as well as no guarantee on whether or not an occupation is stable enough to accumulate wealth may have its worst repercussions on the working poor. According to the University of California’s Center for Poverty Research, the working poor can roughly be defined as those who spent 27 weeks or more in a year “in the labor force” either working
According to Shipler, the working poor need remedies to improve their circumstances. Throughout his novel, Shipler addressed potential solutions that seemed to adjust the lives of the working poor. To help combat low self-esteem and competence more programs should be created by the state or local communities that could be created to assist the working poor in getting their GEDs, personal hygiene if necessary, learning skills that are necessary for job training, balancing daily personal finances,
Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America, published in 2001 by Barbara Ehrenreich, is a book about an author who goes undercover and examines lives of the working lower class by living and working in similar conditions. Ehrenreich sets out to learn how people survive off of minimum wage. For her experiment, she applies rules including that she cannot use skills acquired from her education or work during her job search. She also must take the highest-paying job offered to her and try her best
In The Working Poor: Invisible in America, David K. Shipler describes about the lives of United States citizens who live within poverty. He highlights the U.S.’s disregard for its working poor, the nature of poverty, and the causes of poverty faced by low-wage earners. Shipler performs an amazing job with describing the factors that play their parts into the lives of U.S. citizens who live are poor and within poverty. Shipler explains the effects of tax payments and refunds, the abuse of the poor
“The Original Underclass” by Alec MacGillis, he explores what it means to the “white working-class” and its history in America. Most importantly, the article makes the distinction of exit pollster’s definition of the “white working class” as Caucasian people without a 4-year college degree, which MacGillis considers to be overbroad and does not consider geography and culture. Then, he describes the history of poor white Americans from their arrival to the colonies to present day and how they have
that working class and poor children feel she is referring to the growth and development that the children have experienced growing up. According to Lareau, there are two types of child-rearing that occur in many cultures, which are cultivated growth and natural growth. Cultivated growth is often experienced by upper-middle class children, whereas natural growth is experienced by working class and poor children. Upper-middle class children feel a sense of entitlement and working class and poor children
There are two approach of Childrearing in different social classes include, concerted cultivation and the accomplishment of natural growth. Middle class parents emphasize of concerted cultivation’s strategy of childrearing. On the other hand, working class and poor family parents emphasize of natural growth’s strategy of childrearing. In fact, differences of social classes play a significant role in family life and childrearing. In this paper, I would like to discuss the differences in parenting styles
of the poor they instantly imagine a homeless man sleeping in a cardboard box or the nearest garbage can, but the working poor especially in the inner-city is commonly overlooked by society. However the working poor, in this case the working poor in the inner-city, are people advancing to try and make their lives better. They are taking minimum wage jobs so that they can barely afford a roof over their heads. Within Katherine Newman?s novel No Shame In My Game, she studies the working poor in the
Working Women Imagine being a single parent working full time trying to raise kids and provide for them, with a high school education at best. Employed with minimum wage, sometimes less, working single moms have the toughest jobs. They face problems at home with parenting issues and in the work place dealing with discrimination towards women or other inconveniences. Pulitzer Prize winning author, David Shipler, wrote in his book The Working Poor about working citizens, notably working mothers. Shipler
In The Working Poor: Invisible in America, David K. Shipler tells the story of a handful of people he has interviewed and followed through their struggles with poverty over the course of six years. David Shipler is an accomplished writer and consultant on social issues. His knowledge, experience, and extensive field work is authoritative and trustworthy. Shipler describes a vicious cycle of low paying jobs, health issues, abuse, addiction, and other factors that all combine to create a mountain of
of poverty. Mos Def examines the way American business intentionally denigrates the working class to demonstrate the exploitation and social control that continuously decimates the working poor’s hope. America’s working-class poor, especially those of color often feel neglected, inadequate, and deprived of hope. Mos Def demonstrates the distress of those living in poverty when he expresses, “ Working class poor: better keep your
man to be working extremely hard all the time and being dominated by selfishness and vanity. I will talk about this distinction from a completely different perspective and I believe that the distinction still holds in the today’s world to some extent. When Rousseau talks about the savage man, it makes me think about the people who are living below the poverty line or people who are extremely poor. I believe that the poor people in today’s world could be considered as savage because the poor people are
normal everyday challenges include bills, tight schedules, disagreements, and the unforeseen trials that may arise. It is possible for the average person to have a good day or a few good days while feeling worry free. A person who is considered a part of the working poor may never feel worry free. Their challenges hit them hard each day as they struggle with the issues they’ve most likely dealt with their entire lives. Living in poverty does not afford those citizens the luxury of feeling worry
Ehrenreich lives as a low wage worker and reveals the truth about the working poor. The working poor are defined as people who are employed but have incomes that fall below the poverty line . The families classified as the “working poor”, make up about 72 percent of low income families . It is common misconception that those families who live in poverty so not work enough to provide for their families. Those more unfortunate people who work for low wages are often blamed for not being more conservative