During the Industrial Revolution, the five ruthless, innovative capitalists Andrew Carnegie, Cornelius Vanderbilt, John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, and Henry Ford contributed greatly to the growth of wealth and power in the United States (Schoenthaler, 2018a). However, as a consequence of ruthlessly generating immense wealth, the United States became “the most economically stratified nation on earth” (Schoenthaler, 2018a). Although the five capitalists transformed the United States into a wealthy superpower, they also increased social inequality by taking advantage of workers. By utilizing the plentiful natural resources of the United States, the innovations and production of the capitalists’ companies generated immense wealth and power …show more content…
Under the employment of the powerful capitalists, the workers had long hours and low wages (Schoenthaler, 2018b). Additionally, they worked in poor working conditions and performed mind-numbing work on assembly lines (Schoenthaler, 2018b). These conditions provoked the first of many worker strikes. For instance, one of the first was the Homestead strike against the Carnegie Steel Company (History.com Staff, 2009). When Andrew Carnegie placed Henry Frick, an unethical man, in charge, the workers endured long hours, low wages, and strenuous work (Schoenthaler, 2018b). As a result, the workers went on strike and demanded shorter hours and higher wages (Schoenthaler, 2018b). In response, Henry Frick hired the Pinkerton guards to forcibly remove the workers from the factory (History.com Staff, 2009). Consequently, the battle between the guards and workers resulted in death and injuries on both sides (History.com Staff, 2009). Eventually, the Carnegie Steel Company managed to run the factory again with strikebreakers (History.com Staff, 2009). As a result of these conditions, the capitalists increased the social inequality gap between those of great wealth and of extreme poverty (Schoenthaler,
More often than not, America’s antebellum capitalists are accused of being the “robber barons” of industrial America. The misconception is that these men took advantage of a naïve and growing economy and reaped its benefits without giving anything in return. True, the majority of America was poor in comparison to the few elites, but the philanthropist efforts and contributions of these men can not be denied. If not for these men and their efforts, there would have been no one to pave the road to America’s industrial domination.
Carnegie, Rockefeller, Morgan, and Vanderbilt all had something in common, they were all “Robber Barons,” whose actions would eventually lead to the corruption, greed, and economic problems of Corporate America today. During the late 19th century, these men did all they could to monopolize the railroad, petroleum, banking, and steel industries, profiting massively and gaining a lot personally, but not doing a whole lot for the common wealth. Many of the schemes and techniques that are used today to rob people of what is rightfully theirs, such as pensions, stocks, and even their jobs, were invented and used often by these four men.
During the late nineteenth century rapid industrialization paved the way for extreme economical wealth of many business. In accordance with the overflowing wealth in the nineteenth century many individuals held similar but yet contrasting views toward the wealth that was created in the United States. Among these individuals were Andrew Carnegie, Eugene V. Debs, and Horatio Alger.
Accurately established by many historians, the capitalists who shaped post-Civil War industrial America were regarded as corrupt “robber barons”. In a society in which there was a severe imbalance in the dynamics of the economy, these selfish individuals viewed this as an opportunity to advance in their financial status. Thus, they acquired fortunes for themselves while purposely overseeing the struggles of the people around them. Presented in Document A, “as liveried carriage appear; so do barefooted children”, proved to be a true description of life during the 19th century. In hopes of rebuilding America, the capitalists’ hunger for wealth only widened the gap between the rich and poor.
In the years following the Civil War, the American economy was suffering from extreme disorder. However, during the late 1800s and early 1900s, important leaders of American industry arose, essentially transforming the American financial system from chaos to efficiency. These powerful men shaped America into a world superpower and the country’s economy sparked jealous across the globe. Their contributions to business positively affected not only the United States’ economy, but society as well. Andrew Carnegie, John Davison Rockefeller, and John Pierpont Morgan reflect the mammoth industrial age of America. Although some may argue these industrialists were “robber barons,” these men were, in reality, “captains of industry” utilizing modern business practices and technology which provided both cheap products and job opportunities for the public, as well as becoming large-scale philanthropists and contributing much to American society.
In the late nineteenth century, many European immigrants traveled to the United States in search of a better life and good fortune. The unskilled industries of the Eastern United States eagerly employed these men who were willing to work long hours for low wages just to earn their food and board. Among the most heavily recruiting industries were the railroads and the steel mills of Western Pennsylvania. Particularly in the steel mills, the working conditions for these immigrants were very dangerous. Many men lost their lives to these giant steel-making machines. The immigrants suffered the most and also worked the most hours for the least amount of money. Living conditions were also poor, and often these immigrants would barely have enough money and time to do anything but work, eat, and sleep. There was also a continuous struggle between the workers and the owners of the mills, the capitalists. The capitalists were a very small, elite group of rich men who held most of the wealth in their industries. Strikes broke out often, some ending in violence and death. Many workers had no political freedom or even a voice in the company that employed them. However, through all of these hardships, the immigrants continued their struggle for a better life.
While it is true that these capitalists’ wealth widened the gap between the rich and poor, the discussion that these men were more like the leaders of a growing industry is even more valid. These Northern capitalists led the South away from the depending of farming for their economy, but more importantly, they used their wealth for the growth of America’s industry. If these men did not transfer their wealth towards philanthropist educational development, there would have been no idea for industrial development. And if the American industry could not develop, it would have never have risen to industrial excellence, which has made what our economy what it is now.
The Transportation Revolution in the 1800s, sparked up industrialization and the building of railroads that stimulated every other industry causing an economic boom known as the Gilded Age. From the outside, America seemed like the place to go to make all your dreams come true. But in reality, in was an era of serious social problems mainly caused by an economy with a free market policy, low tariffs, low taxes, less spending, and a hands-off government. This type of economy would eventually lead to the development of monopolies. These monopolies would then, in turn, lead to worker uprisings ‒caused by the suppression of unions created mostly by unskilled workers‒ that would contribute to the rapid rise and downfall of America. An example of this suppression is the Homestead Strike of 1892; due to hostility created by the unions, the employer fired all the workers, and rehired them on the basis that there would not be any more unions. After the workers started working again, the conditions were still unbearable, so the workers shut down the facility. The police got involved, the workers were pushed back, and the facility was reopened union free.
In history, it seems inarguably true that when a nation advanced in power and wealth, changes will soon followed. These changes affected the political, economic and social system of that nation, and often came as an advantage for wealthy individuals, while detrimental to others less fortunate. An example of this notion can be seen in American History. After the Civil War and the Reconstruction Era, America quickly surpassed Great Britain in industrial production thus became the leading nation in industrialization. However, great things do not come without a cost; the rapid technological expansion in the US would initiate the crisis of the 1890s. The crisis of the 1890s was the shift from the rural and agrarian society to a modern urban and industrial society.
This behavior led labor unions to become a staple in the world of big business, though they began forming in the early 1800s, they did not gain any significant membership or power until the 1860s and 1870s. Laborers formed labor unions as a way of protecting themselves from the unfair policies of their employers, and understanding that there is power in numbers, they rallied for the support of coworkers in order to essentially pressure employers to repair business flaws. In the 1890s, Andrew Carnegie’s Carnegie Steel Company employed a majority of the Pennsylvanian steel mill town of Homestead. All but few of the skilled workers were members of the Amalgamated Association of Iron, Steel, and Tin Workers union, which aimed to teach skilled workers what they deserve in terms of working conditions, pay, and hours and also help them how to achieve these standards through negotiations and organized strikes (Benson). However, when the union organized and began a strike on June 29, 1892, they could not have imagined the outcome. Carnegie, deemed too sympathetic to workers and unions by his associates, left his plant manager, Henry Clay Frick, in charge of dealing with the situation. Frick was ruthless in his fight against the union and when union members walked off of their jobs in protest of major wage cuts, he refused negotiation and even locked the workers out of the plant. On July 2, the
In the late 1800s and early 1900s, during the climax of the American Industrial Revolution, there was a small group of men who owned the major businesses and were leaders of their industries. They owned factories, railroads, banks, and even created company towns for the sole purpose of housing their workers. Due to the efforts of these few men, the U.S. economy became the envy of the world, and America became a leading world power. They provided the public with products that were in high demand for reasonable prices, and opened their markets to countries overseas. Although many people believe the early industrialists were Robber Barons who exploited the poor, these great men were truly Captains of Industry who created new ways of doing business, and provided products and services to the public; moreover, they were generous philanthropists who contributed much to society.
Beginning in the late 1700’s and growing rapidly even today, labor unions form the backbone for the American workforce and continue to fight for the common interests of workers around the country. As we look at the history of these unions, we see powerful individuals such as Terrence Powderly, Samuel Gompers, and Eugene Debs rise up as leaders in a newfound movement that protected the rights of the common worker and ensured better wages, more reasonable hours, and safer working conditions for those people (History). The rise of these labor unions also warranted new legislation that would protect against child labor in factories and give health benefits to workers who were either retired or injured, but everyone was not on board with the idea of foundations working to protect the interests of the common worker. Conflict with their industries lead to many strikes across the country in the coal, steel, and railroad industries, and several of these would ultimately end up leading to bloodshed. However, the existence of labor unions in the United States and their influence on their respective industries still resonates today, and many of our modern ideals that we have today carry over from what these labor unions fought for during through the Industrial Revolution.
Steel production in the United States keeps one name in mind, Andrew Carnegie, the Master of Steel. Carnegie was a self-made business man who went on to become one of the wealthiest men in the nineteenth century. Carnegie possessed something he called his “gospel of wealth.” The methods by which Carnegie gained his wealth is widely criticized. Carnegie also had multiple sneaky business plans as well. The author relates the failure of Carnegie to the failure of America as well. Due to a small percent of the population controlling most of the money it caused many problems not only socially but also economically. The Master of Steel, Andrew Carnegie, was a genius during his time but had many unfortunate repercussions as a result of his actions.
Industrial development of the late 18th century (around 1865-1900) is often characterized by it’s affluent, aggressive and monopolistic industrial leaders of the likes of men such as Andrew Carnegie, William H. Vanderbilt, and John D. Rockefeller. Due to their ruthless strategies, utilization of trusts, and exploitation of cheap labor in order to garner nearly unbreakable monopolies and massive sums of wealth, these men are often labelled as “robber barons”. At the same time, they are also often referred to as “industrial statements” for their organization, and catalyst of, industrial development; not to forget their generous contributions to the betterment of American society. Therefore, whether or not their aforementioned advances in industry were undertaken for their own personal benefits, one cannot ignore their positive effects on America. Thus, one can conclude that not only were the captains of industry both “robber barons” and “industrial statements”, but that that these two labels, in fact, go hand-in-hand.
The era that marked the end of civil war and the beginning of the twentieth century in the united states of America was coupled with enormous economic and industrial developments that attracted diverse views and different arguments on what exactly acquisition of wealth implied on the social classes in the society. It was during this time that the Marxist and those who embraced his ideologies came out strongly to argue their position on what industrial revolution should imply in an economic world like America. In fact, there was a rapid rise in the gross national product of the United States between 1874 and 1883. This actually sparked remarkable consequences on the political, social and economic impacts. In fact, the social rejoinder to industrialization had extensive consequences on the American society. This led to the emergence of social reform movements to discourse on the needs of the industrialized society. Various theories were developed to rationalize the widening gap between the rich and the poor. Various reformers like Andrew Carnegie, Henry George and William Graham Sumner perceived the view on the obligation of the wealthy differently. This paper seeks to address on the different views held by these prominent people during this time of historical transformations.