Is King Lear Nature Or Nurture

703 Words2 Pages

Where's Mother Nurture? In King Lear, William Shakespeare's presentation of the female characters challenge the natural assumptions made about gender, King Lear has created three daughters that are more masculine than most men, making it evident that nurture trumps nature regarding the debate of nature vs. nurture. Cordelia, Regan, and Goneril were raised by their father, Lear, a king, a man who is supposed to be most powerful and masculine of all. In result, all of the daughters are strong and powerful. Because there is never a mother figure mentioned, the daughters learned everything they know from their father. In Act 1 scene 4, Goneril tell Lear he has to get rid of his knights in order to stay at her house with her. During this argument, Albany, Goneril's husband isn't present. So when he does show up, he proclaims, "MY lord, I am guiltless, as I am ignorant / Of what hath moved you". (I.iv.) He is completely unaware of why Lear is upset because he simply can't keep up with Goneril. She is obviously in charge of the household. Later in the scene, Lear tells her "I am ashamed / that thou hast power to shake my manhood thus". (I.iv.) Lear is ashamed that Goneril has the power to make him feel sad and irrational, traits that are generally associated with women. …show more content…

Goneril and Regan, being the power hungry women that they are, give Lear answers that will satisfy him but are definitely not true. Whereas Cordelia gave him the truth. Cordelia was able to stand up to her father and tell him how she really felt instead of telling him what he wanted to hear. Doing so she was risking everything she had. This showed strength and bravery, traits that weren't considered feminine during these times. Cordelia was also the leader of the French army in the end, which is far from something any woman would do in the Elizabethan

Open Document