More handpicked essays just for you.
A case study of medical ethics
The Role Of Effective Communication In Health Care
The Role Of Effective Communication In Health Care
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
You might ask yourself what is Medical Ethics.Well Medical Ethics could many thing but mostly bad.It could rejection to health care at a hospitl by doctor that dosent want help you. Maybe it might be because of you rase, skin color, just because he doesn't feel like it.If you make the doctor mad he might deny and medical attention just because you made him mad. When becoming a doctor you take an oath, that oath states you treat all patients equally what gains the doctor the right to treat patients differently. Medical ethics could be so many different thing mostly bad.There's so many stories about medical ethics this this story about this girl. At the age of 13 she was diagnosed with a rare and fated type of cancer.The survived and was cleaned that didn't have cancer. Then 10 years later she fought for her life again, she had sergey. After the Surgery there was no where no sign of the cancer. There years later she married and she became pregnant because of her health history she went to a clinic so they could watch her pregnancy.She had to go back to the clinic for having a lung tumor. She want to be in the best health, surgery was not an option. Her baby was too small to be born yet ,” meaning too premature.” (Thornton )She wanted to keep treating her cancer but, the doctors said that should wait until 28 weeks.She waited and the doctors she it was too dangerous and they wouldn’t help.So they want to cort.The court made it distion and at time is was very ill. The court order a surguy but the doctor said that if she goes into surgery she might not make it. She refused, but the doctors could not refused the courts orders. She was rolled into the surgery room. she made it into through the surgery, but two days later she died. She ... ... middle of paper ... ... want to help them they might die and the doctor sooner or later will feel that guilty drowning them. Its important that we have trust in our doctors for when we need them to be there for us, not neglect us for health care. Doctors might want not want to help you because he might not be experienced and they might to help in fear of doing something wrong and hurting you. Medical Ethics is wrong no matter what. Not want to help is different then not wanting to do it because of fear. Not wanting to help someone because of their attitude just think through it and ignore and just concentrate on their health and ignore her rude attitude.They might be acting like that because they are hurt.Medical Ethics is wrong whoever that happened to before it better to just take them to court and sue them but that might be wrong and just go to a different and these are my opinions..
According to Terrence F. Ackerman, as of the 1980s the American Medical Association had to include the respect for a person’s autonomy as a principle of medical ethics (Ackerman 14, 1982). This includes having the physician provide all the medical information to the patient even if the information could cause negative implication onto the patient. The physician is also expected to withhold all information of the patient from 3rd parties (Ackerman 14, 1982). Although it is seen as standard in today’s world, in
The case of Marguerite M presents an ethical dilemma. Medical ethics play a special role in medicine and is directly concerned with its practice. Its role has continued to evolve as changes develop in
Principles of Biomedical Ethics, by Tom Beauchamp and James F. Childress, has for many critics in medical ethics exemplified the worse sins of "principlism." From its first edition, the authors have argued for the importance and usefulness of general principles for justifying ethical judgments about policies and cases in medical ethics. The organization of their book reflects this conviction, dividing discussion of particular ethical problems under the rubrics of the key ethical principles which the authors believe should govern our moral judgments: principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice.
Medical ethics in general is not a modern term; it goes back in time to the 12th century to the Hippocratic Oath. Recently in the 21st century the interest in medical ethics was provoked by a series of medical scandals: Nazi medical experiments, the infamous Tuskegee syphilis studies and so on. After which autonomy in the form of an informed consent was obligatory for minor and major procedures. (2, 3)
Making good ethical decisions in the medical field s very important. Ethics are a set of standards of right and wrong, that tell what we as people should do. For example, consequence for murder, and benefit social health. When the doctors in the story "Flowers for Algernon", did not look for Charlies best interest or safety. Only that they had a subject to test their operation on. Charlie Gordons doctors did not act ethically when they preformed the surgery to increase his intelligence.
Medical ethics are a questionable matter. If the surgery helps the patient and doesn’t cause harm it is ethical. If it causes harm and stress it is unethical. One example of an unethical surgery is the mind altering surgery Charlie Gordon (a mentally handicapped, 37 year old man who lives in New York) underwent. Two neurosurgeons Doctor Nemur and Doctor Strauss performed the surgery. The surgery was an attempt to triple his IQ of 68 and make him a genius.
In this diverse society we are confronted everyday with so many ethical choices in provision of healthcare for individuals. It becomes very difficult to find a guideline that would include a border perspective which might include individual’s beliefs and preference across the world. Due to these controversies, the four principles in biomedical ethic which includes autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice help us understand and explain which medical practices are ethical and acceptable. These principles are not only used to protect the rights of a patient but also the physician from being violated.
Today’s society protects against discrimination through laws, which have been passed to protect minorities. The persons in a minority can be defined as “a group having little power or representation relative to other groups within a society” (The Free Dictionary). It is not ethical for any person to discriminate based on race or ethnicity in a medical situation, whether it takes place in the private settings of someone’s home or in a public hospital. Racial discrimination, in a medical setting, is not ethical on the grounds of legal statues, moral teachings, and social standings.
Physician-assisted suicide refers to the physician acting indirectly in the death of the patient -- providing the means for death. The ethics of PAS is a continually debated topic. The range of arguments in support and opposition of PAS are vast. Justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for PAS. The distinction between killing and letting die, sanctity of life, "do no harm" principle of medicine, and the potential for abuse are some of the arguments in favor of making PAS illegal. However, self-determination, and ultimately respect for autonomy are relied on heavily as principle arguments in the PAS issue.
Ethics refers to the values and customs of a community at a particular point in time. At present, the term ethics is guided by the moral principles that guide our everyday actions. These moral principles guide the researcher into deciding what is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. The foundation of medical ethics is governed by two philosophical frameworks: deontology, and utilitarianism. However, ultimately, the ethics committees need to balance the risks, and benefits for the participants and the community associated with the particular research proposal.
One of the major ethical issues in this case is the fact that there is a lack of informed consent. Doctors are not talking clearly with their patients they are not giving the right to patients to know about the potential risks and alternative procedures they could make. Instead, doctors are practicing defensive medicine and ordering extra tests and individuals they know have no hope. Another major issue is the fact that individuals are not given the right to self-determination. Every human being of adult with a sound mind has the right to determine what shall be done with his or her own body, and unfortunately, are not respecting people’s rights.
Baby Boy Doe’s story was interesting to read and analyze when thinking about ethics. The doctors in this story did what they should have as far as hospital policies are concerned, but they may not have acted as ethically as some would expect. The hospital and the parents are responsible for the death of the child, they each acted as ethically as they could but the end result was devastating. Ethical decision making can be difficult but understanding how to identify an ethical dilemma and moral principles can make the decision easier to work
McGee, Glenn and Arthur L. Caplan. "Medical Ethics." Microsoft® Encarta® 98 Encyclopedia. © 1993-1997: Microsoft Corporation. CD-ROM.
Garrett, T. M., Baillie, H. W., & Garrett, R. M. (2010). Health care ethics: Principles and problems (5thed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Another huge ethical topic is the patient’s right to choose autonomy in the refusal of life-saving medicine or treatment. This issue affects a nurse’s standards of care and code of ethics. “The nurse owes the patient a duty of care and must act in accordance with this duty at all times, by respecting and supporting the patient’s right to accept or decline treatment” (Volinsky). In order for a patient to be able make these types of decisions they must first be deemed competent. While the choice of patient’s to refuse life-saving treatment may go against nursing ethical codes and beliefs to attempt and coerce them to get treatment is trespass and would conclude in legal action. “….then refusal of these interventions may be regarded as inappropriate, but in the case of a patient with capacity, the patient must have the ultimate authority to decide” (Volinsky). While my values of the worth of life and importance of action may be different than others, as a nurse I have to learn to set that aside and follow all codes of ethics whether I have a dilemma with them or not. Sometimes with ethics there is no right or wrong, but as a nurse we have to figure out where to draw the line in some cases.