Economics, in one aspect, is the study of how individuals, societies, and countries manage to deal with the problem of scarcity. Scarcity is a problem within economics because the wants of people are unlimited and the resources available to fulfil those wants are finite (Sloman, 2001). The answer to scarcity is efficiency which Gowland and Paterson (1993) described as the most benefit from a certain amount of scarce resources. Within the economic system, there are several types of economies, each generating a different level of efficiency. It is said that an economic system that has allocative efficiency, productive efficiency, and equity will be effective. Along with the latter mentioned, the division of labour and comparative advantage, when exploited also bring about the effectiveness of a system. Within an economic system there are two contrasting ideals: the market economy and the planned economy. A free-market or laissez-faire economy makes decisions on an individual level with minimal government intervention. On the other hand of the spectrum lies the planned economy where all economic decisions are made by the government (Sloman, 2001). Both economies have their advantages and disadvantages. In a free-market economy there is freedom of choice, high incentives, and the belief in consumer sovereignty, yet, there are problems such as inequality of income, macroeconomic instability, and the chance of market failure. Likewise, though a planned economy has advantages such as low levels of unemployment and equal distribution of income, there is a loss of personal freedom and lack of consumer choice. Many people feel that efficiency lies in the free-market economy where one can easily answer the questions what should be produced, how it should be produced, and for whom. However, the problem with this ‘capitalist’ economy is that poverty and boom and bust cycles reduce progress (Economic Systems: How Societies adapt to Problems, 2003). “If you care about economic efficiency, you should like free markets…But they would also believe the second one should be qualified, in addition to its stabilisation and distribution functions, governments will be needed to correct market imperfections…” (Rhoads, 1999, p.66) Rhoads (1999) mentions how a market economy leans towards more efficiency but needs the government sporadically, a combination which makes the so-called mixed economy. A mixed economy which leans towards laissez-faire, as in the case with the U.S or the United Kingdom, is rather successful. On the contrary, countries, such as Burma or North Korea, which slant towards a planned economy, lack progress. Along with allocative efficiency, how resources should be allocated, productive efficiency, which production method should be utilised, and equity, “specialisation and exchange are both necessary to have an efficient economy” (Demmert, 1991 p.3). Specialisation comes in the
There are three kinds of economic systems. They are as follows. One is an economic system with the name of “custom based economy”, it is a system that is mostly found in the third world countries. In the system, every child of every generation will be thought to use the same ideas to produce the same good...
A market economy that fails, to address the needs of at-risk children and adults. Currie feels Americans are so focused on the economy that there is no regulation, Americans also believe, it is a free market, and that individuals are responsible for their own failures or success. This type of economy is a system in which economic resolution and pricing of goods and services are determined and focused entirely by the aggregate of country’s citizens and business with little government intervening or central planning. This means private firms account for all production. Meaning consumers decide what should be produced, based off of what they have purchased.
Despite its size, only 190 pages, the authors address the basic concepts of economics while also applying those politically and for personal finance decision making. Those basic concepts include scarcity, gains from trade, marginal decision-making, profit management, income growth, and Adam Smith’s invisible hand theories are all discussed within the first part of the book; allowing readers to understanding the concepts, Gwartney applies the same concepts to the creation of wealth and the importance of competition, private property, open trade, monetary stability, and lower taxes. This book educates its audience by evaluating our economy and government mechanisms without the overpowering display of charts, formulas, and graphs; which you would typically see in a textbook allow...
In a laissez faire market, the market does not self-correct to prevent the economy from sliding into a deep recession as its proponents suggested. In fact, if the market is left to its own accord, during difficult times the economy will further weaken because manufactures will cut production, which will lead to higher unemployment, which will then lead to less disposable income, which will lead to a drop in consumer consumption, which will lead to a drop in sales and eventually another cut back in manufacturing. This is known as the Multiplier They are constantly advocating for less government in the market place. But to me it appears as if the 1% with 99% of all the money, are simply advocating for themselves. Without government interference they are free to create monopolies, gouge consumers, and sell products that are hazardous to the public.
Throughout history the world has experienced several types of socio-economies, from Mussolini’s fascism to Mao’s communism. All of those economies have its weaknesses and strengths and most have countries that can validate its effectiveness. However, to decide which economy is truly better for society, there has to be criteria on which to judge the economy’s effectiveness. So what is a society? In essence, it is a network of bonds we as human beings forged under the assumption, that working together we can all be happier than if we were only looking out for ourselves. With society, everyone is able to concentrate on what they do best, reap the benefits from the skills of others, and avoid the conflict that would arise otherwise. Thus, it follows that the ultimate goal of society is the happiness of everyone. And currently, there is only one economy that has staved off the test of time and reached that goal. Capitalism, with its merit system, flexible cost adjustments, and by having no other economic contenders is able to achieve a better society than any other socio-economic system can.
...market economics. These two styles of government clash over basic human motivation. Laissez-Fair economics have many benefits and better account for human nature. Its downfall is the greed and apathy of those involved as human corruption creates discontent in workers who can easily be enticed by socialism. A Socialistic government holds the promise of utopia and equality for those who have been downtrodden by society. Unfortunately such a society would never work as long as human beings are involved. With no ability to raise or lower your standard of living such a society quickly robs a person of their self worth and desire to contribute to society. While each society has its advantages and disadvantages Capitalism is the only society to survive for any length of time as all previous Socialist societies have become dictatorships before they reached a utopia.
Capitalism has never been dead and will be here for at least the next century. In a world where the market is filled with imperfections, it is in order for the government to interfere to restore order in the market. Increased concerns over the 2008 market collapse prompted the government’s to take charge of their responsibility and act. Capitalism is a system of government that favours individual growth with minimal government interference. The opposite of capitalism is communism, where the property owner is the state, and the main aim is social welfare enhancement. A mixed economy embraces the two and balances between the extremes. Many countries across the globe have adopted a mixed economy as it reduces the losses suffered by the countries that practice the extremes. Capitalism has been known to be responsible for growth of economies among them, the United States, Britain, and other developed countries. In this essay, we shall examine the future and nature of capitalism in the light of a mote communist future.
Therefore a free market is not desirable as maximizing their utility is priority. So government is expected to correct the market failure by choosing to char...
When it comes to financial planning, economics plays a major factor in people’s personal finances in many ways, it is an essential part of the world we live in today. When you buy gas, or shop for groceries, plan a vacation, economics is at the core of those choices. So why does economics play such a vital role, what is the driving force behind this? In its simplest form, it’s based on choice. We will look at a few factors that impacts financial planning and the economy, including the use of credit, and how the government affects the economy.
If one looks at liberty and individual freedom, it is evident that command economies tend to oppress their citizens. Therefore, socialism, which allows for basic needs to be met and personal freedoms to be upheld, is the best economic system for all of a country’s citizens. Market economies, as a whole, inherently and inevitably lead to poverty and a large class disparity. In a capitalist society, the ones who supply labor, the ones who work the hardest, are the ones who are paid the least. The owners, who are already rich, receive most of the profit and accumulate large masses of wealth.
Our lives are greatly affected by our culture, ecological environment, political environment and our economic structure. The overarching method of organizing a complex modern society relies heavily on the founding economic theories regarding method of production, method of organization, and the distribution of wealth among the members of. This paper, specifically deals with the views and theoretical backgrounds of two dominant theories of the past century, Keynesianism and Neo-liberalism. Our social economic order is product of the two theories and has evolved through many stages to come to where it is today. The two ideologies rely on different foundations for their economic outcomes but both encourage capitalism and claim it to be the superior form of economic organization. Within the last quarter of the 20th century, neo-liberalism has become the dominant ideology driving political and economic decisions of most developed nations. This dominant ideology creates disparities in wealth and creates inequality through the promotion of competitive markets free from regulation. Neo-liberal’s ability to reduce national government’s size limits the powers and capabilities of elected representatives and allows corporations to become much larger and exert far greater force on national and provincial governments to act in their favour. Hence, it is extremely important at this time to learn about the underlying power relations in our economy and how the two ideologies compare on important aspects of political economy. In comparing the two theories with respect to managing the level of unemployment, funding the welfare sates, and pursuing national or international objectives, I will argue that Keynesianism provides far greater stability, equ...
The world’s economies continue to be divided on by whom their means of production benefit, supply, enrich, and protect. Many debates and altercations have been a result of disagreements between capitalists and socialists. Socialists believe the government is essential in providing equality for all and the allocation of capital goods. But the strength of capitalism can be attributed to an incentive structure based upon the three P’s: (1) prices determined by market forces, (2) a profit-and-loss system of accounting and (3) private property rights. The failure of socialism can be traced to its neglect of these three incentive-enhancing components. (Perry) Socialism gives power to the government to regulate the goods produced, the amount of goods produced, where the goods are distributed, and the price of the goods. This command system does not allow for the creativity, wealth, and freedom that capitalism supplies the citizens. Capitalism provides a market system that permits companies to regulate the economies themselves. Capitalism offers the world’s economy the freedom to manage itself, diversify, prosper, fail, and freedom from regulation in order to supply the world based on demand and creativity. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one’s birth or station in life. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards virtue and punishes vice. This applies to both the business executive and the carpenter, the lawyer, and the factory worker. (Thomson) Capitalism is the world’s dominant economic system. Within it, the means of production and distribution are owned by individuals: private ownership and free enterprise are believed to lead to more efficiency, lower prices, be...
One of the first and major differences between a Communist and Democratic government is their contrary economic systems. In a communist government, the community owns the major resources and means of production. The goal of such a system is to prevent any one person or group of people from becoming radically rich, while others are extremely poor. The system attempts to eliminate lower class by balancing the wealth between rich and poor, therefore giving everyone equal pay and ownership. Unfortunately, this results in an increased lower class. However, in a Democracy, free enterprising is permitted, and smiled upon. ? Here, free enterprising helps the economy to flourish. People can organize their own businesses and receive their own profits if it succeeds, or debts if it fails. In this system, the harder a person works, the more money they receive, allowing them to ‘make ends meet.’ The downside to democracy is that people can get a high paying job through education, but may work just as hard at a lower paying job and receive less money. As Winston Churchill once said, "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." Generally, Democracy’s seem be more successful economically.
Economics is the study of how best to allocate scarce resources throughout an entire market. Economics affects our lives on a daily basis, whether it is on a business level or a personal level.
The economics, as an independent subject has already existed in this world for a long time. Maybe some people believe that the knowledge which is contained in economics is so far from them that it is not necessary to consider about is. Actually, economics always hides in our daily life and effects decisions what we made. Once I have hold the same opinion of economics is not really my business, but I do not think like this any more after I studied this subject. Economics no longer acts as an abstract terminology lying on the textbook far away from me, this word became meaningful and I am sure it will make some changes not only in my mind, but also in my future life.