Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short and long term effects of obesity
Short and long term effects of obesity
Psychological effects of fast food
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short and long term effects of obesity
In the article “What You Eat is Your Business” by Radely Balko, he talks about how the government should stop making laws and policies about anti-obesity. David Zinczenko wrote an article called “Don’t Blame the Eater”, according to Zinczenko, he thinks people need to be more responsible in the way they eat. Both believe that it is the people’s problem the obesity rate is increasing more and more each year.
Balko makes a bold statement by saying “We’re becoming less responsible for our own health, and more responsible for everyone else’s. Your heart attack drives up the cost of my premiums and office visits.” (Balko 467). What he means by this is, because of the health problems that come with obesity, for instance heart disease, stroke, high
…show more content…
It seems ridiculous at first, but then he talks about himself when he was young, that when his family split up and his mother had to work long hours to cover the bills just to make ends meet, he had no choice but to eat fast food for lunch and dinner, just because his mother didn’t have the time and little money. When he was 15 years old, he weighted 212 pounds and was only 5’10. But his life completely changed when he joined the Navy Reserves and learned how to manage his diet. He also says most teenagers that lived like him when he was young won’t have the opportunity to change their life like he did. But will be stuck in the never ending hole of constantly eating fast food every day, because that’s all they know. Zinczenko includes information gathered by the National Institutes of Health that says “Before 1994, diabetes in children was generally caused by a genetic disorder---only about 5 percent of childhood cases were obesity-related, or Type 2, diabetes. Today, according to the National institute of Health, Type 2 diabetes accounts for at least 30 percent of all new childhood cases of diabetes in this country.” (Zinczenko 463). As you can see, because of the growing fast food industry food it is causing more people to become obese and then passing those hereditary traits on to their
As for David Zinczenko, he grew up on the infamous fast food diet that once saved his life when hunger struck due to the affordable prices restaurants had to offer. “Lunch and dinner, for me, was a daily choice between McDonald’s, Taco Bell, Kentucky Fried Chicken or Pizza Hut” (Zinczenko 462). These unhealthy habits eventually caught up to him and resulted in an unflattering weight gain. Fortunately, he went to college, connected with the Navy Reserves and also became associated with a health magazine in which he learned how to manage his diet. He didn’t stop there; in fact, he is president of Galvanized Brands, a global health and wellness media company and he is also the author of multiple books: Eat This, Not That and the Abs Diet series. The most remarkable part, he was able to recover and become healthy again unlike many others who have gone too far to make a comeback, therefore, becoming obese. In “Don’t Blame the Eater”, Zinczenko talks to those who are consuming the
Feed by M.T. Anderson is an ADULT sci-fi novel about a world in the future where a new technology, called the Feed, is implanted into your brain. Feed was a boring and uninteresting book that should not be added to the already rigorous English curriculum for 9th grade students. The curriculum consists of other novels such as Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare and To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. I write to parents, teachers, and school administrators because they have the ability to make the right choice for our students. I believe that the book Feed shouldn’t be adopted into the English curriculum for freshman students because it sets a bad example for students, it teaches very little to children, and it is not practical for 9th graders.
Balko develops an angry tone about the fact that government believes unhealthy people should depend on healthy people or they should not hold any responsibility. Actually, Balko complains the way government prohibits any private insurer to charge additional fee of obese clients is unwise. Balko’s claim is that if people had to pay more financially, they would be more cautious about their choices on what foods should they consume. I agree with him on this point, because if insurers want to charge overweight clients with higher premiums, the clients would try to be fit in the average range to avoid paying any hard-earned money from their pocket. Balko evokes ethos appeals by demonstrating if the government is willingly paid for his anti-cholesterol medicine, then what the motivations for exercising are. He makes the audience sympathize with him by saying that what the government does is wrong. Toward the end, Balko implies that people will make better choices if there is no one responsible for those choices.
Zinczenko’s argument summed up is that fast food restaurants are to blame for America’s obesity issues. He gives statistics that go over childhood obesity and Type 2 diabetes, diabetes cost of health care in the United States, and the number of McDonalds restaurants in the United states. The only thing that Zinczenko suggests to change is that he wants all fast food restaurants to post nutritional information, and he
Richard Balko and Mary Maxfield discuss personal responsibility, and choices in one’s health in their essays “What You Eat Is Your Business,” and “Food as Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating” respectively. Balko feels the government should not intervene in people’s food intake because it is an individual preference. Instead, Balko asserts that the government should foster a program to assist the American people to take on personal responsibility and ownership of their own health. Similarly, Maxfield paints the same picture that our culture now finds it immoral to eat what our body needs, therefore believing in the idea of eating less is healthier. Maxfield points out the multi-billion dollar campaign of corporations into advertising false hope into consumers by buying into eradication of fatness. Why has food have suddenly become a risky subject at the dinner table? And who is to blame? Is it everyone else or do we blame ourselves?
Zinczenko argues that fast-food companies ultimately hold responsibility for the growing problem of obesity and type 2 diabetes among the country. Due to the inexpensive prices, indefinite locations, and the deprivation of nutritional labeling. In Zinczenko’s view, “Before 1994, diabetes in children was generally caused by a genetic disorder- only about 5 percent of childhood cases were obesity-related, or type 2, diabetes. Today, according to the National Institute of Health, type 2 diabetes accounts for at least 30 percent of
Best selling author of Eat This, Not That, David Zinczenko’s article “Don’t Blame the Eater,” blames the fast food industry for the growing rate of obesity in the United States. Zinczenko’s main idea is that fast food companies should have warning labels on all the food they supply. Zinczenko believes that since health labels are put on tobacco and preserved food product, fast food industries should put labels on today’s fast food. Discussions about the availability of fast food compared to healthier alternative were brought up as well. Zinczenko states that when looked at, a salad from a fast food restaurant could add up to half of someone’s daily calories (155). He believes that because of fast food, Americans are having more health risks, which includes an insane rise in diabetes. Some agree with Zinczenko saying fast food companies should be the ones responsible to show people the truth about their foods. On the other hand Radley Balko, a columnist for FoxNews.com, states that fast-food consumption ...
adults are obese. Additionally, the leading cause of death in the United States is heart disease, which is more often than not tied back to obesity and all of its factors. Knowing the causes of obesity is important to conclude whose responsibility is what. Some of the causes are related to genetics, overeating, people’s diets, and how frequent people eat. Some others are lack of physical activity, lack of necessary medication, and use of certain medication. Obesity can also be caused by psychological factors and social issues. Social issues can be anything from lack of money to purchase health foods to lack of safe places to walk or exercise. All of these causes are what makes it difficult to put the blame on a single
Should people be held accountable for what they eat? Many believe that it is a matter of public health, but some think that it is the matter of personal responsibility. In the article “What You Eat Is Your Business,” Radley Balko argues that the government spending more money on anti-obesity measures is the wrong way to fix the obesity epidemic. He claims that people should be more responsible for their personal health. I am of two minds about this author’s claim that eating and lifestyle are matters of personal choice. On the one hand, I agree with his claim because of the unfair insurance policies, people should be more responsible for their own health, and people should take the time to be responsible for their kid’s health instead of blaming someone or something irrelevant. On the other hand, the government should do their best to dispose of “food deserts,” provide more opportunities to live a healthy life style, and give tax breaks to people selling healthy foods.
Balko’s use of informative statistics makes the reader think about government’s role with obesity, and how much they should to do with it being solved. For example, President Bush put $200 million into his budget for anti-obesity measures, and some Senators, including Joe Lieberman, made the call for a “fat-tax” on high calorie foods. Although it appears these politicians and government officials are all trying to help society and this growing problem in America, many would agree they are just hurting the cause. I remember when I
Ever since the creation of the golden arches, America has been suffering with one single problem, obesity. Obesity in America is getting worse, for nearly two-thirds of adult Americans are overweight. This obesity epidemic has become a normal since no one practices any type of active lifestyle. Of course this is a major problem and many wish it wasn 't in existence, but then we start to ask a major question. Who do we blame? There are two articles that discuss numerous sides of this question in their own unique way. “What You Eat is Your Business” by Radley Balko is better than “Don 't Blame the Eater” by David Zinczenko due to its position in argument, opposition, and it’s reoccurrence in evidence.
The authors Balko and Zinczenkon have two different points views on one similar topic and that would be who is to blame on how American families becoming so overweight. Balko blame the government for putting pursuer on the insurance comping for stopping them from over charging overweight and obese people. And then there is Zinczenko he blames the fast food restaurants for not labeling their food. I acknowledge how they both see how there are different causes for Americans for being overweight. Putting labels on the food that’s are fast food chains allows the customer know what type of meal they are consuming and insurance companies overcharging people that are over weight so they could realize that their bad habitats do come at a
David Zinczenko states numbers and facts that open the eyes of his reader along with state his position of how fast food states no warnings that it could make someone obese or develop type 2 diabetes. His first statement is telling his readers a little background about how fast food affected his life and how he was once obese because he consumed such meals. Zinczenko explains how the increase in diabetes (specially type 2) were linked to the high consumption of fast food meals. He then goes on to address how much money is being spent to help take care of the mass amount of children with type 2 diabetes, showing how the price has gone up substantially over the past couple decades. The author then claims how the restaurants don’t give any healthy alternative and how its easier to find a McDonalds in American than an healthy alternative such as fruit. To wrap up the article he shares how he feels that obese kids who sue these fast food restaurants have good ground to do so since these places don’t put warnings on their foods; From Zinczenko himself “I say, let the deep fried chips fa...
The government must have a say in our diets. Because the issues of obesity have already reached national scales, because the costs of obesity and related health issues have gone far beyond reasonable limits, and because fighting nutritional issues is impossible without fighting poverty and other social issues, the government should control the range and the amount of available foods. The cost of healthier foods should decrease. The access to harmful foods should be limited. In this way, the government will be able to initiate a major shift in nutritional behaviors and attitudes in society.
Finally, besides of making healthy decisions, another key issue to examine is the lack of parental guidance in terms of Zinczenko’s argument that, especially for teenagers, unhealthy and fattening food is almost un-avoidable. It’s not all kids fault to eat junk food their parents are equally responsible for this problem as much as kids because can teach their kids from early age to not eat junk food. Most of our parents taught us that smoking and drinking is bad for us but never taught is that sugar is also bad as drinking and