Non-alignment after the Second World War can be defined as the countries that were neither supporting Capitalist world nor the Communist Soviet Blocs. Moreover, non-alignment countries in post world war II were also known as ‘Third World’. Some scholars also interpreted non-alignment as countries that are neutral or not ally with any major powers. For instance, country like Egypt. Thus does non-alignment still applicable after the post Cold War 1991? Or is it considered as worthless? Arguably, it is agreed that it is still relevant despite the end of the cold war because; world war III is inevitable and non-aligned movement functions as mediator to retain peace; also the primary objectives of non-alignment movement (NAM) are to consolidate against all forms of expansionism and protect other countries from being dragged into great power alliances as well as foreign offensive; and the triumph of non-alignment movement in solving international conflicts during the Cold War. Conversely, some argue it is redundant in post Cold War as there are no longer divisions of the two power blocs; non-aligned only works in Cold War and not during the aftermath of the Cold War and NAM became handicapped in their movements.
The crucial issue arises after the end of the Cold War is the threats of Third World War. Countries literally aware of the world’s development of mutually destructive weapons such as chemical and nuclear armament. For instance, the continuing of Syria’s civil war and Iran’s development of nuclear weapons. United Nation Security Council (UNSC) and USA had condemned Assad’s Government on applying the chemical weapons on protesters which was contradicting with human rights. In response to this catastrophe, USA and Israel had also ...
... middle of paper ...
...post Cold War as the roles of non-alignment is to preserve peace and could avert the possibility of an outbreak of World War III. Moreover, the aims of the NAM are to unite all member countries from any threat of expansionism and foreign aggression where it is still relevant and crucial even after the end of the Cold War. Furthermore, it becomes absolutely relevant as non-aligned movement had proven to be a successful institution in the international platform during the Cold War. On the other hand, it is considered redundant as the divisions of power do no longer exist after the Cold War. In addition, the non-alignment only served during the Cold War and after the end of the Cold War it does no longer need. Lastly, the incapability of non-alignment and non-pragmatic as a role model in international arena make it redundant to be applied after the end of the Cold War.
The Cold War was a period of dark and melancholic times when the entire world lived in fear that the boiling pot may spill. The protectionist measures taken by Eisenhower kept the communists in check to suspend the progression of USSR’s radical ambitions and programs. From the suspenseful delirium from the Cold War, the United States often engaged in a dangerous policy of brinksmanship through the mid-1950s. Fortunately, these actions did not lead to a global nuclear disaster as both the US and USSR fully understood what the weapons of mass destruction were capable of.
The Cold War was the most important historic event in the 20th century after the Second World War, from 1945 till 1991 between two most powerful countries in that period – Soviet Union and USA. The Cold War invested a lot in world politics. What is the Cold War? This was a war for dominance in the world. In 1945 the USA was the only one country in the world that had the nuclear weapons. But in the 1949 USSR started to learn their nuclear weapons. In further developments forced the USSR was soon created by nuclear, and then thermonuclear weapons. (Isaacs J, 2008) Fight has become very dangerous for all.
The political ideologies of the USA and of the Soviet Union were of profound significance in the development of the Cold War. Problems between the two power nations arose when America refused to accept the Soviet Union in the international community. The relationship between the USA and the Soviet Union was filled with mutual distrust and hostility. Many historians believe the cold war was “inevitable” between a democratic, capitalist nation and a communist Union. Winston Churchill called the cold war “The balance of terror” (1). Cold war anxieties began to build up with America and the Soviet Union advancing in the arms race for world dominance and supremacy. America feared the spread of Communism
Odd Arne Westad, Director of the Cold War Studies Centre at the London School of Economics and Political Science, explains how the Cold War “shaped the world we live in today — its politics, economics, and military affairs“ (Westad, The Global Cold War, 1). Furthermore, Westad continues, “ the globalization of the Cold War during the last century created foundations” for most of the historic conflicts we see today. The Cold War, asserts Westad, centers on how the Third World policies of the two twentieth-century superpowers — the United States and the Soviet Union — escalates to antipathy and conflict that in the end helped oust one world power while challenging the other. This supplies a universal understanding on the Cold War (Westad, The Global Cold War, 1). After World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union opposed each other over the expansion of their power.
International organizations such as NATO and the UN are essential not only for global peace, but also as a place where middle powers can exert their influence. It is understandable that since the inception of such organizations that many crises have been averted, resolved, or dealt with in some way thro...
...uring the cold war and with relations with foreign nations even long after the cold war.
In the past, when empires formed alliances, it’s either due to the speed and possibility of war, the change of power from nation to nation, and whether there is a presence or absence of ideological problems. It’s no secret that we live in a competitive world. This has been proven much throughout history as empires have competed against each other. The conclusion, is that as one empire rises, another falls. From the late 19th and early 20th centuries, we’ve had the Holy Roman Empire followed by the Mongol Empire, to the French, British, American and several other empires. All with the exception of American, no longer exist t...
At the end of the catastrophic World War II on October 24, 1945, fifty-one nations gathered to officially form the United Nations, an organization that promoted peace and security for all of its members. Despite the success of establishing a worldwide peace-keeping force, tensions were high between the powers of the Western Bloc (the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the Eastern Bloc (the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact). Ironically, a mere five years after the formation of the UN, the first major outbreak in the Cold War occurred: the Korean War. The effects of the Korean War would not only forever change the state of North and South Korea, but also have a significant effect on all the other nations involved in the Korean War.
The League of Nations was an Intergovernmental Organisation which persisted from 1919 up until 1946 where it was formally replaced with the United Nations towards the end of the Second World War. Many consider the League as one of the International Systems greatest failures due to it being widely regarded as an ‘ineffective instrument to tackle aggressors’ (Catterall, 1999, p. 52) and its inherent failure to prevent international conflict. However,
The Cold War was an ideological struggle between Soviet Union and Eastern Europe opposing the United States and Western Europe. Liberal democracy became the First World; it was capitalistic and democratic countries with United States leading these countries. Authoritarianism became the Second World, which were communistic and autocratic countries with the Soviet Union leading the Second World countries. Lastly, anti-colonialism became the Third World; it was less economically developed where poverty is more pronounced. This world was looking for a ‘third way.’ There were three patterns to find a ‘third way’ – decolonization: negotiated transfer of power, violence, and revolution. All of these three worlds were in competition for influence of the
The Cold War was a time of great tension all over the world. From 1945 to 1989, the United States was the leader and nuclear power and was competing with the Soviet Union to create huge stockpiles of nuclear weapons. However, even though the Cold War ended, nuclear weapons are still a threat. Countries around the world strive to create nuclear power, and they do not promise to use it for peaceful purposes. Some examples of the struggles caused by nuclear weapons include the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and Iran’s recent nuclear weapon program. Surely, nuclear weapons have created conflict all over the world since the Cold War era.
(1) After the end of World War II, all involved countries, with no exception of being victorious or defeated, have started seeking of the prevention of a new disaster by reconstructing and maintaining the security and peace primarily in Europe. All huge and disastrous events (such as World Wars) which affected whole world were originated from the uncomfortable conditions and conflicts in the continent. Thus the main task was to settle a mechanism that would eliminate any emerging threat against the continental security and maintain the order and peace. For this purpose, in 1949 West European countries established the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in order to protect the member countries against any possible attack which was primarily expected from the East European Countries led by the Soviet Union. During the Cold War, NATO’s primary goal was to circumvent any aggression held by the iron-curtain countries. Military deterrence (by developing high-tech and nuclear weapons and locating them to the eastern frontier of the Alliance, Germany and Turkey) was the main strategy in preventing any large-scale attack from the Soviet Union and other Warsaw Pact countries. By the end of Cold War many debates were made and still is going on whether the Alliance completed its mission in the territory. In spite of all, The North Atlantic Treaty has continued to guarantee the security of its member countries ever since. Today, following t...
From Declaration #35 of Agenda 2030, we learn that the U.N. will develop peace and safety - or nothing else will work. This brings up an interesting proclamation from the
Over the years the endurance of NATO has led to closer ties among its members and to a growing community of interests. The treaty itself has provided a model for other collective security agreements. NATO activities are no longer small only to Europe. In
Whenever world politics is mentioned, the state that appears to be at the apex of affairs is the United States of America, although some will argue that it isn’t. It is paramount we know that the international system is shaped by certain defining events that has lead to some significant changes, particularly those connected with different chapters of violence. Certainly, the world wars of the twentieth century and the more recent war on terror must be included as defining moments. The warning of brute force on a potentially large scale also highlights the vigorousness of the cold war period, which dominated world politics within an interval of four decades. The practice of international relations (IR) was introduced out of a need to discuss the causes of war and the different conditions for calm in the wake of the first world war, and it is relevant we know that this has remained a crucial focus ever since. However, violence is not the only factor capable of causing interruption in the international system. Economic elements also have a remarkable impact. The great depression that happened in the 1920s, and the global financial crises of the contemporary period can be used as examples. Another concurrent problem concerns the environment, with the human climate being one among different number of important concerns for the continuing future of humankind and the planet in general.