What Led to China's 1989 Student Demonstrations

808 Words2 Pages

Although the tensions during the 1989 student demonstrations and the Chinese Communist Revolution were similarly rooted in both the conflict between the state and the market and between the state, the collective, and the individual, one difference was evident. The peasants were dissatisfied with the government’s planned economy during the Cultural Revolution, but in 1989, market-based reforms angered all social groups except the one in power. Selden’s article illustrates the two challenges China faced during the Communist Revolution: reaching economic prosperity while maintaining political power and keeping tension between the state and the individual at a minimum. In the same way, the tensions behind the 1989 student demonstrations echoed the two issues China had encountered during Mao’s rule. His insistence on a command-based economy during the Communist Revolution brought opposition from the peasants; on the other hand, Deng’s move toward a socialist market economy garnered the animosity of all social groups, discounting the one in charge. Selden argues that China’s attempts to take advantage of the market without losing political power created tension between the individual, the collective, and the state throughout the Chinese Communist Revolution. Chairman Mao came into power faced with a backward economy and a politically unrest nation, but he promised to create a united, strong, and economically prosperous China. To accomplish this, he laid out a two-phase plan. During Phase One, the moderate phase, he aimed to support the lower and middle peasants. In addition, he protected the entrepreneurs in order to promote economic growth. Allowed to keep their property rights, citizens had an incentive to work harder and provide t... ... middle of paper ... ...ieved that the economic and political reforms were inefficient and that government had too much control. Industrial workers, low-level bureaucrats, party officials, army, and police made up the “too fars,” who protested that their fixed incomes excluded them from reform benefits and threatened their power within society. They wanted to return to traditional cultural and moral practices. Still, the initial reforms satisfied the high bureaucrats and the peasants, who finally prospered after a long period of poverty. However, peasant support for Deng eroded after decreased state investment in agriculture, leaving the high bureaucrats as Deng’s only supporters. Seen as the root of the problem, bureaucrats did nothing to alleviate the widespread discontent; as a result, the “not far enoughs” and the “too fars” united behind their shared discontent toward the government.

Open Document