What Is The Difference Between The Cold Dish And Custer's Fall

941 Words2 Pages

Both the books The Cold Dish by Craig Johnson and Custer’s Fall by David Humphries Miller are books that show certain characters overconfidence and how it can sometimes lead to their demise either literally or in a social and reputational way. The characters George Custer, Cody Pritchard, and Jacob Pritchard are all fantastic signs of why this arrogant type of overconfidence can lead to many types of problems with themselves as person or as viewed by the community. Overconfidence can lead to many problems as a person, for example both Cody and Jacob Pritchard from The Cold Dish believe they can get away with doing just about anything in there little county of Absaroka in Wyoming. When both these boys and two others rape and assault a Cheyenne …show more content…

While both Walt Longmire and Vonnie are sitting at the local bar they begin to talk about the mounted Antelope behind the bar.“Pop used to speak in biblical terms, but what he said was that the brutes of the field don’t feel pain like humans. That’s the price we pay for thinking.” (Johnson 23) She is saying that because they are animals they don't feel the normal guilt that humans do everyday. The boys that were found guilty might have felt invincible at the time but as time went on they began to figure out that because of the crime that they committed it began to tear their families apart and almost immediately destroyed their reputation.Custer had the same problem when he lost his battle to the Native Americans. But instead of everybody knowing about his failure as an American Army Colonel little was ever really spread about the fact that he lost to Native Americans. “Even today, most Americans are familiar with the fact that our army once went down to a devastating defeat at the hands of wild indians. Beyond that , little is actually know about Custers debacle by the average citizen.” (Henry VII) It not only damaged Custers reputation as an American Colonel because of the massive underestimation he made about the Native Americans but it would have damaged the reputation of the rest of the American Army so they described the Indians as “wild” and “savage” making it look as Custer's battalion was incredibly overmatched so it didn't damage their reputation as the greatest military power in the world. Now Cody and Jacobs reputation wasn't covered up what so ever as they were being judged by the community that knew them and where the crime had happened, but at the time of Custer’s debacle there was no one around at the time for his reputation to be as incredibly slashed because there was no community to judge him other than his fellow comrades he died

Open Document