Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
overview of parenting styles
overview of parenting styles
overview of parenting styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: overview of parenting styles
Throughout life we are placed into social classes, whether we educate ourselves, marry into it, or taught by our parents. Each one has a connection to our family life and impacts it. With marriage you can marry into wealth or have two working parents. Through education parents can receive higher education, which helps them gain higher pay. Parenting style also affects the family life style depending on social class. Each of these are connections between social class and family life will be discussed.
Marriage has an important connection between family life and social class. It 's important because if a person were to get married, the couple would be able to pool their money together and build a better life. It would bring them up in the social
…show more content…
Working class parents aren 't home enough to focus on their children. A lot of times these children have more freedom compared to a higher class family. The type of parenting affects the family, depending on which class they are in, parents want to instill certain skills and traits in their children. In the article review of the book Unequal Childhoods by Annette Lareau, the writers explain the effect different class parents have on their own children. Parents from the middle class want their children to be hardworking and obedient. The middle class children share a trait of entitlement. Parents raise them to take charge and “actively manage interactions”.(Tiger Girls on the Soccer Field) Thus parents get their children involved in certain activities. An example would be sports, many parents want their children to succeed in the job market and hopefully gain a higher up job like them. A parent Malcolm admits he doesn’t want his daughter to be “girly-girl”. He explains “I don 't want her to a be a cheerleader but I want her to prepare to have the option, if she wants to be an executive in a company, that she can play on the turf”.( Tiger Girls on the Soccer Field) Malcolm “believes that sports don 't just steer his seven-year-old daughter toward assertiveness, they actively drive her away from traditionally feminine pursuits”(Tiger Girls on the Soccer Field) The higher class parents instill thoughts of
Does it matter what your social and economical standings are, and do they play a role in if you will succeed in life? The importance of this essay was to talk about the different viewpoints and to argue the point of succeeding and social statuses. I
Although it may not occur often Lareau fails to gives examples of different social classes using the opposite parenting style that is expected. Not every family is the same. In this book, every middle and upper middle class family focused on concerted cultivation and every working and lower class families focused on accomplishment of natural growth as their parenting styles. The book shows absolutely no example of a working or lower class families that raise their children under the concerted cultivation parenting styles and vice versa. From a personal standpoint, I was raised in the middle class and according to these two parenting styles it is likely that I will be raised in a concerted cultivation environment but in reality I was raised with a mix of concerted cultivation and accomplishment of natural growth with more of an emphasis on accomplishment of natural growth. There are most likely many other families that may mix these two parenting styles together or use the one that is not commonly associated with their social class and Lareau failed to also represent those families in her
Once upon a time marriage was a requirement of society and a value to many women who wanted a stable life. It stand as a commitment to their husband and to God. It remain a way to start a proper family in the eyes the Lord. It was what many mothers and daughters dreamed of. Now that, many generations have passed many people believe marriage is not valued and Divorce rates are higher than ever. Religion has also become optional and there’re many different religions to choose from. Cohabitation has also reigned over society one doesn’t need to wait till marriage. Now you are able to move in with the person you love at any point in life. Marriage had started as a first option to many but it has become the last. There are still reasons why marriage
The theme in working and poor class parents is that they are not as attentive to their kids as middle class parents are. However, this does not mean that they do not love their kids. It is just a different approach to development. This ties back into the major concept Lareau: concerted cultivation or natural growth. Working and poor class parents adopt a “let kids be kids” mentality and do not intervene as much. Middle class parents are very involved in their kids’ lives by enrolling them in various activities, but because of hectic schedules they to do not have a great deal of down time to spend together as a
There are two approach of Childrearing in different social classes include, concerted cultivation and the accomplishment of natural growth. Middle class parents emphasize of concerted cultivation’s strategy of childrearing. On the other hand, working class and poor family parents emphasize of natural growth’s strategy of childrearing. In fact, differences of social classes play a significant role in family life and childrearing. In this paper, I would like to discuss the differences in parenting styles that described in the article “Invisible Inequality” by A. Lareau, beside to analysis the incorporation of a system-lifeworld from Habermas’ theory.
The upper class are able to afford all kinds of things that put their children at a higher advantage. Whether it be playing tennis at a country club, private piano lessons, and etc. The lower class have less access to these types of learning experiences for their children. They are more of a self-taught learner, and success is rarely a solo achievement. That was the whole takeaway from Lareau's study. She conducted a study with twelve families within the middle and the lower class, and saw how they performed based on their parenting skills. She learned that they’re two child learning styles. First method is Concerted Cultivation. This is commonly used by wealthier families. These kids would have more privilege than the majority, "One of the well-off children Lareau followed played on a baseball team, two soccer teams...lessons" (pg.103-104.) and, "They expected their children... authority." Parents are highly involved with their child’s success, being active in their lives and their talents. Teaching them how to perform their own insights, as oppose of adults talking down to children. Second method is Natural growth. Parents see their children already growing and taking care of themselves and are seen as less whiny and more behaved. However, were not taught to speak up for one's self to a higher authority, "The poorer children were, to her mind, often better behaved...
parents For example; in the article “From Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work” by
Today in approximately 95 million middle-class American homes the idea that you can pick up the phone on a Friday afternoon and invite a friend over for dinner is foreign. It is a completely alien concept that a family could make plans to share quality time with friends and extended family without a two to four week advanced notice. However, in the 200 million working class and poverty level homes the idea of not being able to make those last minute plans is the foreign thought. Parenting styles in these American homes is what Annette Lareau addresses in “Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life”. Based on my experience and other evidence, Lareau’s argument that middle and upper class parents use concerted cultivation and working class parents use natural growth is accurate because our personal calendars of events do not lie.
Marriage is the beginning of family life, culmination of a period of seeking a mate, and realization of a major goal.
Numerous other studies have also showed how children seem to mimic the persona of their parents. It is well-known that children often attempt to copy their parents, but furthermore they seem to become a certain type of person that fits the “middle-class” mold. These children see how their parents interact with other adults through aspects such as their speech and even dress. This prompts the children to expect the same results when acting in the same manner. The working-class students rarely see how their parents interact with such entitlement either because they do not have the means or the confidence. They in turn remain more timid and less pro-active.
Socioeconomic status (SES) is a measurement of a combination of education, income and occupation (American Psychological Association, 2014). It is more commonly known as class standing. There is a drastic difference in lifestyle between class standings. In today’s economy it has become more evident just how different the classes are. Lower levels of SES do not have access to good schools, or decent health care leading to a worse quality of life. Higher levels of SES have access to more resources and tend to allow for children to develop self-esteem, optimism, and perceived control (American Psychological Association, 2014). The traditional family with two parents, the father works, and the mother stays more is almost nonexistent. Households where the man works and the woman stays at home only represent 7% of the U.S. population (Malone, Stewart, Wilson & Korsching, 2010). It has become increasingly more difficult to live on one income especially with children. With ...
Social class often puts us in a group or community of people who share similar experiences such as, having a low income. People that come from upper class households, may have an advantage at
Marriage is termed as a legitimate commitment or social establishment which unites two people mutually as husband and wife. The agreement ascertains privileges and responsibilities amid spouses, spouses and children and spouses and in-laws. Marriage is deemed to be a momentous union in every society. It is significant in terms of providing security, emotional support and fulfilling economic, social, cultural and physical needs. These needs are the natural cravings of young adults that drive them towards matrimony. It is a foundation that is based on personal responsibilities which form the backbone of civilizations.
Have you suffer and feel disappointment in your life? Who is willing to support to you without any reason when you fail for doing something? The answer is your family. Usually, family members can tolerate our mistakes and help us to solve our personal problems. Many people believe that having a family is happiness and they don’t need to be alone and support with each other. The family life is a very important to discuss because our attitude on the family value may effect to our views toward the world. In the article “ The Color of Families Ties: Race, Class, Gender,and Extended Family Involvement”, Gerstel and Sarkisian argued that that the social class did not make the poor family had weaker ties and the relationship
K Campbell (1996) as well as Daniel Bell (1996) for analysis. This paper will first take a took at traditional society and the values it holds. For instance, traditional society is known for its highly strict divisions of labor as well as honor. Additionally, Gender roles were also greatly valued as there were specific roles for both the men and women within the family. Campbell (1996) states, Members of the traditional society are also held to be responsible for the action of any other member (Campbell, 1996, p. 101). This exemplifies prestige which, is immensely important in a traditional society as it was an indicator of high status within the society itself. On the contrary, modern society is unlike traditional society, the family itself is not always of the highest importance, instead there is great importance of individualism and freedom as it is the central aspect. Therefore, freedom is essential and opposition towards forces which attempt to restrict individual freedom. Modern society values ambition and upward mobility, whereas in traditional society an individual destiny is determined before they even come into this universe. Therefore, in brief its easily seen that modern society is more realistic in the sense that it allows room for growth. Opportunities to change set destiny are realistically acceptable due to the advancement in child rearing itself. Everyone has a right to education, it’s a opportunity that allows individuals to change their own destiny. The expansion of higher education and the extensions of a permissive social atmosphere has widened the scope of discretionary social behaviour (Bell, 1996, p.155). In conclusion though there are still disadvantaged in social class, family structure them self have changed drastically for the better. One can now choose their own destiny as well as the role they’d like to