What Is The Cause Of Wallace's Victory?

September 11, 1297 an English army confronted Wallace and his men at the Forth River near Stirling. Upon his arrival to Stirling, William and another soldier named Andrew Moray, reached north of Stirling a placed called Abby Craig. Wallace realized he and his troops were outnumbered and crossing the bridge the Scottish notice that, the bridge was only wide enough for at least two horse man to cross at a time. Wallace realized that it would take the English hours to cross the bridge and, so William took advantage of the Englishes problem.

Why Britain Won the Battle of Britain After taking France in addition to his list of captured countries on mainland Europe, Adolf Hitler set his sights on Britain. After the success of Blitzkrieg, the evacuation of Dunkirk and the surrender of France, Britain was by herself. However, before Hitler could contemplate undertaking an invasion he was advised by his generals that Germany had to destroy the Fighter Command of the Royal Air Force in order to gain superiority in the air. This would in turn enable him to gain control of the English Channel in order to transfer the 160,000 German troops on the 2000 invasion barges, which had been assembled in German, French and Belgian harbors, over the channel to Britain unscaved. Between august and September in the summer of 1940, under the codename of operation sealion the planes of the German

by the results of an English soldier's attempted rape of Murron. While Wallace is able to

William Wallace has come to be known as one of Scotland’s many heroes and the undeniable leader of the Scottish resistance forces dying for their freedom from English Rule at the end of the 13th century.

Born in about 1270 William Wallace planted the seeds of rebellion in may 1927 with the assassination of William de Heselrig. Later that year he led a battle at Stirling bridge in which he massacred the English. His largest battle was the battle of Falkirk in which he lost his army and his reputation. He then served as a diplomat but he couldn't gain any support and eventually was captured by King Edwards men. He

Reasons for British Victory in the Battle of Britain After the BEF's retreat from Dunkirk, of all the countries opposed to Nazi Germany, Great Britain was the only one still in resistance. Hitler's plan was to quickly invade Britain and to concentrate fighting on other fronts, with almost the whole of Europe under Nazi Germany. The Blitzkrieg tactics used to invade other countries so far could not be used effectively as the British channel blocked infantry advance. Britain at this time still had a superior navy compared to the Germans, hence plans to eliminate the RAF, allowing easier destruction of Britain's ports; and so its navy. Operation Sealion, as it was named, began on 1st July 1940.

Wallace is the cause behind to the defeat of the insurmountable evil Edward Longshanks. His refusal to call mercy will being tortured

You have come to fight as free men, and free men you are. What would you do without freedom? ”. Wallace uses the word tyranny to describe the English that rule over the Scotts and are considered by many of them to be prejudiced and cruel. The Scotts then realize what exactly they are there to fight for, for their freedom and the freedom of all Scotts. The repetition of the word free plants the idea in the Scotts that they are a free people and should not be subjected to the rule of the English. This feeds into their reasoning as to why they fight with Wallace. It is at this point when one of the warriors utters “Fight? Against that? No, we will run; and we will live”. It illustrates the concern the Scotts have that if they fight they will die for nothing. Wallace immediately addresses this fear by responding “Aye, fight and you may die. Run and you'll live -- at least a while”. It lets the warriors know the truth, they very well may die if they fight and will probably live if they decide to run, but it makes them wonder at what the cost will be. They will still die one day whether they fight or not but if they run they will metaphorically running from that regret the rest of their

Rebel, Hero, Freedom-Fighter, Martyr. These are just a few of the words that race through our minds when we hear the name of William Wallace. Over the past few hundred years popular culture has raised Sir William Wallace from the bloody battlefields of Scotland to a place on a pedestal among the greatest heroes of history. In this ascent, the line between the man and the myth has become blurred. So who was William Wallace? In my research I have found many conflicting theories, each historian or author to delve back into the past returns with a slightly different interpretation then those before him. However, one thing remains certain and that is that William Wallace was a game changer.

Mel Gibson’s epic drama has several historical inaccurate facts. William Wallace was not a poor villager like he was portrayed but a landowner and knight. The movie starts in year 1276 were Scots are gathered in a meeting to select a new King after Alexander’s III death. In reality, Alexander III was an alive and healthy man. There had been peace between Scotland and England for almost 60 years until his death.