What Is The Allegory Of The Cave And Thinking As A Hobby

1400 Words3 Pages

To be a great teacher, you must first be a great learner. When you learn something, most of the time your first instinct is to go out and share it with the world, because it’s an interesting experience to see people's faces light up as they learn something new. The Allegory of the cave by Plato, Thinking as a hobby by William Goldman, The Chosen by Chaim Potok, and Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl, explore a little about being a learner and a teacher, and the way to become the best of each of them. The Cave is Plato’s thoughts on how the world thinks, as well as Goldman’s Thinking as a Hobby. The Chosen teaches a lot about learning and teaching by exploring the thoughts and ideals of Reuven and Danny, who both focus on learning by …show more content…

In The Cave, you have a slow progression of becoming a higher thinker, and in Thinking, you have sudden leaps in quality of thought. The first level is seeing the shadows, the second would be seeing the fire and puppets and going to tell the people seeing shadows that they know nothing, being very critical and condescending. One reason this doesn’t happen in the Cave is because he was moved from those opportunities too quickly to be properly critical. The third stage is after he has been dragged out of the cave and brought into the light and his eyes have adjusted to the point where he can see everything without pain (Plato). The stages of thought don’t show the progression, the first is complete ignorance with the idea that you are actually knowledgeable, the second is learning so you can tear people down and be condescending of their wrong views and ignorance. The third stage is knowledge and an attempt to improve yourself (Goldman). The biggest gap in logic here is the gap between the second and third levels. The third stage of thinking is when you can look at the sun and see it in all it’s glory, and you are enlightened. The second stage is when you are either still in the cave or stumbling around in the light because you can’t see anything except the shadows of the truth. The third stage is mostly about self-reflection and correcting other’s wrong …show more content…

Plato said that if you spend enough time in the light, you want to go back into the cave to teach your companions that there is so much more than the wall of that cave and that life is so much better out there. The prisoners mock the higher thinker because he cannot see the small and simple things anymore because he has been exposed to the light and has more knowledge than they do. He cannot see shallowly anymore, so it takes time for him to adjust so he can teach the prisoners best. Golding’s Thinking shows teaching differently at the three stages. The first stage would be just the grade ones saying their opinions repeatedly until someone agrees with them, and they remain secure in their ignorance. The grade twos, again would tell the grade ones they are wrong and prove why they are by destroying their opinionated argument logically. The grade twos would then leave without building up a better opinion that is supported by facts, because they get enjoyment out of using their knowledge to tear people down. Grade threes are the best teachers because, unlike grade twos who only think about themselves and don’t spend time on self-reflection, grade threes do. They truly want to educate people so they can have a better life, and they spend time on self-reflection to become a better person themselves. Plato’s Cave

Open Document