Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
starbucks accounting analysis
Starbucks industry analysis
literature reviews on inventory management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: starbucks accounting analysis
Starbucks’ solvency ratios provide valuable insight into whether the company is generating sufficient cash flow to meet short-term and long-term obligations. At the end of 2014, Starbucks current assets of $4169 million and current liabilities of $3039 million produced a current ratio of 1.37. During this same period, Starbucks had quick assets of $2474 million (cash of $1708 million + short-term investments of $135 million + accounts receivable of $631 million) with current liabilities of $3039 million resulting in a quick ratio of 0.81. These ratios imply that Starbucks was reasonably liquid at the end of 2014 with $1.37 in current assets and $0.81 in quick assets for every $1 in current liabilities. In 2013, Starbucks had a current ratio of 1.02 and a quick ratio of 0.71 and the previous year the company’s current ratio was 1.90 with a quick ratio of 1.14. This data shows that Starbucks’ current ratio and quick ratio decreased considerably from 2012 to 2013 indicating a reduction in liquidity. Starbucks liabilities increased dramatically in 2013 because of an accrued …show more content…
The most visible increase was seen between the years of 2008 to 2009 from 30 days to 57 days. Starbucks held inventory the most with an average of 69 days in 2012. From the years 2010 to 2012, days in inventory increased every year, which implies that the inventory remained on the shelf for a longer amount of time. Furthermore, Starbucks increasing number of days in inventory from 2005 to 2014 may be a sign of short-term troubles with over estimating sales, overproduction, or slow-moving inventory. In 2014, Starbucks turned over inventory on average approximately 59 days. This ratio shows that Starbucks managed their inventory more efficiently in 2014 compared to 2013 when Starbucks held inventory for an average of 67
Analyzing Wal-Mart's annual report provides a positive outlook on Wal-Mart's financial health. Given the specific ratios and its comparison to other companies in the same industry, Wal-Mart is leading and more than likely continue its dominance. Though Wal-Mart did not lead in all numbers, its leadership and strong presence of the market cements the ongoing success. The review of the current ratio, quick ratio, inventory turnover ratio, debt ratio, net profit margin ratio, ROI, ROE, and P/E ratio all indicate an upbeat future for the company. The current ratio, which is defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, is a measure of how much liabilities a company has compared to its assets. Wal-Mart in the year of 2007 had a current ratio of .90, and as of January 2008 it had a current ratio of .81. The quick ratio, which is defined as current assets minus inventory divided by current liabilities, is a measure of a company's ability pay short term obligations. Wal-Mart in the year of 2007 had a quick ratio of .25, and as of January 2008 it had a ratio of .21. Both the current ratio and quick ratio are a measure of liquidity. Wal-Mart is not as liquid as its competitors such as Costco or Family Dollar Stores Inc. I believe the reason why Wal-Mart is not too liquid is because they are heavily investing their profits for expansion and growth. Management claims in their financial report that holding their liquid reserves in other currencies have helped Wal-Mart hedge against inflationary pressures of the US dollar. The next ratio to look at is the inventory ratio which is defined as the cost of sales divided by average inventory. In the year of 2007, Wal-Mart’s inventory ratio was 7.68, and as of January 2008 it was 7.96. Wal-Mart has a lot of sales therefore it doesn’t have too much a problem of holding too much inventory. Its competitors have similar ratios though they don’t have as much sales as Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart’s ability to sell at lower prices for same quality, gives them the edge against its competition. As of the year 2007, Wal-Mart had a debt ratio of .58, and as of January 2008, it had a debt ratio of .59. The debt ratio is calculated by dividing the total debt by its total assets. Wal-Mart has a lot more assets than it does debt so Wal-Mart is not overleveraged.
Measuring the liquidity through the current ratio, with 2.74 in the year 2009,0.74 above the standard, with the decline in the following year meeting exactly the standard at 2% in the year 2010, and a steep decline in the year 2011-2012 as compared to its standard.Resulting in the decline in firm’s ability to meet its day-to-day operating expenses. The current liabilities from 2009 to 2012 have increased by 27.03 billion whereas the investments in current assets have increased just by 26.09 billion, which causes the decline in the current ratio. To cope up with this problem the company should invest more in current assets and should reduce its current liabilities.
Datamonitor. (January 2005). Starbucks Corporation. Retrieved September 22, 2006 from, http://www.investor.reuters.com from University of Phoenix Library.
Total operating expenses show to be the highest in 2009 at 102.2 and at the lowest at 86.6 in 2012. Along with the decrease in expenses, operating income shows to have increased significantly from 2009 to 2012. Starbucks restructured its business increasing sales growth while cutting operating and overhead costs. As shown on the financial statement, total operating expenses as a percentage of total net revenues has declined from 102.2% to 86.6% resulting in the increased percentage of net earnings from 3.2% to 10.4%. They have reduced store operating expenses by 5.5% (35% to 29.5%), depreciation and amortization expenses by 1.4% (5.5% to 4.1%), and restructuring charges by 3.4%(3.4% to 0%). The decrease of store operating expenses as a percentage of total net revenues was also due to increased Channel Development and licensed store revenues. Along with the decrease in store operating expenses, we can see that interest expense slightly decreases. This decrease in interest expense may be another reason behind the increase in net earnings. And also, income from equity investees was increased due to the increase in income from global partnership and joint venture
If a bank wanted to look at the big picture when making their decision to give out loan to a company, they would look at the Cash Ratio, because cash is the most important of all assets, it provides the bank or creditor an idea of the likelihood of the company being able to pay them back on the loan. In the comparison between Home Depot and Lowe’s we find that the trends are very similar to the quick ratio with Home Depot having more cash to cover its liabilities than Lowe’s. As expected, the cash ratios are lower than the quick ratios, because short-term investments and receivables are taken out of the equation. Over the past six years, both companies’ cash ratios have been declining with an average of 0.186 for Home Depot while the average
Liquidity measures a company's capacity to pay its debts as they come due. However, Wal-Mart’s current ratio is 0.93, Target current ratio is 1.11 and the industry ratio is 3.04, which is much higher, so I would say that it is good but needs improvement. The quick ratio for Wal-Mart is 1.04 and Target’s quick ratio is 0.21 and the industry ratio is 0.31, which is much higher. Wal-Mart’s is higher and needs some improvement and Target’s is good. Accounts receivable for Wal-Mart is 9 days and Target’s is 6 days, whereas an estimate for the industry is 17 days, which means that both of them are doing better than the industry standards. Target’s inventory ratio is 6.04 and Wal-Mart’s inventory ratio is 0.81, and the industry ratio 1.58. These numbers shows that Wal-Mart is good but Target needs improvement. Furthermore, based on this analysis, I would say that Wal-Mart and Target are doing well but both have areas that need improvement.
Starbucks Financial Analysis Company Overview Starbucks is the world’s largest specialty coffee retailer, with more than 16,000 retail outlets in more than 35 countries. Starbucks owns more than 8,500 of its outlets, while licensees and franchisees operate more than 6,500 units worldwide, primarily in shopping centers and airports. The outlets offer coffee drinks and food items such as pastries and confections, as well as roasted beans, coffee accessories, teas and a line of compact discs. The company also owns the Seattle's Best Coffee and Torrefazione Italia coffee brands. In addition, Starbucks markets its coffee through grocery stores and licenses its brand for other food and beverage products.
The purpose of this paper is to provide data and analysis of PepsiCo, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Companies financial statements so that a potential investor can make an educated decision about where to place their money. The paper shows a vertical analysis of each company’s consolidated balance sheet, a horizontal analysis of their consolidated statement of income ratios showing solvency, liquidity and profitability.
Overall, how satisfied are you , with [PRODUCT/SERVICE]? Please answer using the rating scale where (5) means "extremely satisfied" and (1) means "very unsatisfied."
The Quick Ratio shows that the company’s cash and cash equivalents are the highest t...
Preliminary Starbucks – one of the fastest growing companies in the US and in the world - has built its position on the market by connecting with its customers, and creating a “third place” beside home and work, where people can relax and enjoy themselves. It was the motto of Starbucks’ owner Howard Schultz and, mostly thanks to his philosophy, the company has become the biggest coffee drink retailer in the world. However, within the new customer satisfaction report, there are shown some concerns, that the company has lost the connection with customers and it must be taken some steps to help Starbucks to go back on the right path regarding customer satisfaction. I will briefly summarize and examine issues facing Starbucks. Starting from there, I will pick the most important issue and study it from different positions.
According to IBIS World Report the major players in the US coffee and snacks retail market are Starbucks and Dunkin’ Brands at 36.7% and 24.6% market share respectively with other competitors occupying the remaining market share of 38.7%. The industry is at the mature stage of its life cycle, has low barriers to entry and intense competition and rivalry between the players. The regulation and technological change within the industry is medium (IBIS world report)
In 2014 comedian, Nathan Fielder opened a coffee shop in Los Angeles that he called Dumb Starbucks. Both Starbucks and Dumb Starbucks are not affiliated however, Fielder used Starbucks' famous trademark and placed "Dumb" in front of it. He also mimicked their menu but placed the word "dumb" in front of every product. The shop caused something of a media stir when the News media reported on the opening of Dumb Starbucks and it gain recognition and publicity. Dumb Starbucks and the baristas gave away free coffee until they ran out. Some individuals reportedly waited an hour, if not three hours for a free cup of coffee from Dumb Starbucks. "There were also "dumb" versions of the CDs sold at [Dumb] Starbucks" (Lee). Dumb Starbucks was only open
Starbucks recognizes its employees for much of its success. This is due mostly to maintenance of a great and proven work environment for all employees. The company does not have a formal organizational chart; sot employees are permitted by management to make decisions without a management referral. Moreover, management trust and stands behind the decision of the employees and it is this that allows for employees to thinks for themselves as a part of the business, so as to make them feel as a true asset and not as just another employee.
The current ratio and quick ratios for the year 2003 are at 2.5 and 1.3, which are both higher than the industry average. The company has enough to cover short term bills and expenses. Both the current and quick ratios are showing an upward trend compared to 2001 and 2002. The current assets decreased by $ 20,264 to $ 1,531,181 and the current liabilities also decreased considerably by $255,402 to $616,000, a 29.3% decline, thus making the current ratio jump to a 2.5. The biggest decline was seen is accounts payable which decreased by $170,500 to $230,000, a decline of 42.6 %.