Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of community service as punishment
community service as a punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Shame punishments should be implemented in the Justice system. Because we waste so many tax dollars for locking up small-time offenders, we should use shame to save money and make the system more helpful for those who are in it. Punishing by shame can be effective through many forms, such as, community service or participating in an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting to overcome drinking problems. Shame makes the punishment more personal to the offender and creates a solution that is best for society. If a graffiti painter had to clean up all of the graffiti in the city, he would be sick of it. Shame is a way we could solve the problem in the Justice system.
Jail Time vs. Shame In her essay, June Tangney explains her position on shame
…show more content…
Community service is an excellent way to teach an offender a lesson without them feeling as if they are worthless to society. Criminals do not realize how bad the crime really is until they see the consequences in their face. Drug dealers do not genuinely know how their drugs destroy multiple lives by encouraging their bad actions for their personal gain. Servicing a drug rehab center could let them know the stories of the people that he would have encouraged to get back on drugs. They would think about their past actions and regret …show more content…
People, who are humiliated through shame punishment, will act out because they do not want to be made out as a bad person. Humiliation should not be the goal of shame punishments. Guilt should be the goal to work towards. If a person is humiliated amongst their peers, they will act out by attacking people that make fun of them. What happens with humiliation is people use it to punish the person, not the action. Guilt punishes the actions and causes the individual realize that they are not bad people they did a bad action. Once the person realizes the consequences of their bad actions, they will grow as individuals and repair their
punishment is an asset to society: it is the only punishment that fits the crime, it deters potential criminals
Public shaming was a common punishment for criminals in the 19th century, however, it is not as common today. Public shaming is not an effective way of punishment for many reasons. Although the offender may have done something wrong, shaming them publicly can harm them in many ways. According to Dana Canedy, guilt is more humiliating than shame, which is what the culprit will feel after what they have done. Another thing that public shaming can result in the wrongdoers privacy being violated. In the article, “Florida 'Scarlet Letter' Law Is Repealed by Gov. Bush”, the man who stole the money was forced to put a sign outside of his house, admitting that he had stolen the money. This violates his privacy because he feels insecure every time someone
The proposed theoretical framework that works best with drinking under the influence is the Reintegrative Shaming Theory. At the core of the Reintegrative Shaming Theory is the need to shame individuals engaged in criminal activities. However, the shaming has to function within the context of a criminal justice system. The theory premises that tolerance of crime is a pre-requisite for the worsening of illegal activities (Hay, 2001). Secondly, the theory connotes that stigmatization inherent to the shaming of crime is disrespectful because it tends to outcast individuals from the general community, which is a pre-requisite for further rebellion. Additionally, the best theory of re-integrative shaming is the “disapproval of an act within a continuum of respect for the offender, disapproval terminated by the ritual of forgiveness [leading to] crime prevention” (Dansie, 2011, pp. 71). The proposed Re-integrative Shaming Theoretical approach identifies that shaming (or social disapproval) creates emotional distress on the offender. The scope and extent of the shame are bound to vary because different people respond differently to shaming. However, standardization of the structured shaming may
There are several types of punishment that can be inflicted upon an offender including, fines, community sanctions and imprisonment (The Judicial Conference of Australia, 2007). Punishment is described as a sanction which inflicts a certain amount of pain and loss on the offender, used for payback and deter (The Judicial Conference of Australia, 2007; Carlsmith, Darley, & Robinson, 2002). There are three ways society justifies punishing offenders, through the
However, it might cut down on the court system over loads for these type of offenses and minimize the incarceration rate due to the over population for misdemeanor offenses. This attempt to fix social relations with the community, this is not the fix all to stop criminal behavior throughout our communities in America. The checks and balances in the triangle of community justice will not be able to satisfy all the grievances between the victim and the offender due to human nature indifferences in beliefs and
The proliferation of harsh mandatory sentencing policies has inhibited the ability of courts to sentence offenders in a way that permits a more "problem solving" approach to crime, as we can see in the most recent community policing and drug court movements today. By eliminating any consideration of the factors contributing to crime and a range of responses, such sentencing policies fail to provide justice for all. Given the cutbacks in prison programming and rates of recidivism, in some cases over 60% or more, the increased use of incarceration in many respects represents a commitment to policies that are both ineffective and unfair. I believe in equal, fair and measured punishment for all. I don't advocate a soft, or a hard approach to punishment. But we must take a more pragmatic look at what the consequences of our actions are when we close our e...
Those who abuse drugs need to have proper treatment in order to refrain from continuing their addiction after prison by being sent to a rehabilitation facility, or in the case that money is not available, a free program or sober living household instead of putting them in jail. The use and abuse of drugs in our country is a large and rising issue. A start to solving this problem is as simple as having those arrested instead sent for a cure for their addiction. Each user sent to rehab is another user cured from our world and more drugs off the streets. The reduction of drugs will come one step at a time, and this could be a huge step forward if the leaders of our nation are willing to give it a try.
Humiliation is the most important element which needs proper attention because its presence causes havoc on people's mind, soul, lives and hampers the work at the workplace. Humiliation plays a vital role in character development and on character structures that render persons more vulnerable to it.
With incarceration costs becoming high there are new alternatives rising, one of the most popular being public shaming. Public shaming should not be considered appropriate for any offense that can result in a short jail term. Public shaming can do so much emotional damage to someone, and no one should feel such incredible humiliation or self hatred. People who endure public shaming cannot bear to live with themselves sometimes that it could lead them to do something irrational. Public shaming at times is not even a punishment for some, if someone does a crime they should also do the time. Public shaming can comes with serious consequences if given to the wrong person and if given to others it is just a slap on the wrist. Crimes should be taken seriously and so should the punishments. People should go to jail or do community service based on what they have done, they should not be let go so easily.
James Gilligan is an American psychiatrist who presents the causation and prevention of violence from his point of view of working in US prisons for decades in his book “Preventing Violence”. Gilligan provides readers with a multitude of data and theories, but his book (or at least the first four chapters) boils down to the fact that violence towards other is caused by shame. He calls upon his many years of interaction with prison inmates and explains how inmates who committed violent crimes often said it was because they were disrespected, and therefore shamed. However, it’s very important to highlight that it takes not only shame but also an inability to “regain respect” after a shameful event, to cause violence as Gilligan proposes. This
For example, I have a friend that was placed on house arrest for some of the mischief he caused in the community that eventually led to him being charged. In cases like that I would propose that something along the lines of community service or some projects in the community to show his community that he is aware of the consequences of his actions and that he’s willing to help better and make positive change in his community as well. This is a step that shows that he’s attempting to reform himself but that he’s truly turned over a new leaf and that his past mischief is firmly behind him. This is one of the many possible steps that the juvenile justice system can take on the road to improve
Feinburg (1994, cited in: Easton, 2012: 4) says that punishment is “a symbolic way of getting back at the criminal, of expressing a kind of vindictive resentment”. When punishing an offender there are two key principles that determine the kind of punishment. These are the Retributivism response and the Reductivist response. The first principle, Retributivism, focuses on punishing the offence using 'denunciation' where they denounce the crime that has been committed so society knows they have done wrong, and it also uses 'just deserts' where the equity 'eye for an eye' is the main idea. The second principle, Reductivism, believes that deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation is the best strategy to use to punish, its aim is to reduce crime and use punishment to serve a purpose. This essay will look closer and outline the purpose of just deserts and deterrence as punishment in society, although these punishments are used widely across most crimes, this essay will look specifically at prolific offenders.
All people, regardless of race, gender, or profession, feel shame in their lives. Shame is defined as humiliation caused by the consciousness of wrong or foolish behaviour. Shame researcher Brené Brown in a Ted Talk defined guilt as “I’m sorry for this mistake” whereas shame is “I am a mistake.” She also stated that vulnerability is not weakness, and shame teaches creativity, emotional risk, courage, and innovation. Shame for not satisfying society’s standard of perfection leads people of different races and genders to hate themselves, to hide their flaws, and not to take the opportunities they want, when in reality making mistakes is human. Brown concludes that shame is an epidemic in our culture, and empathy is the antidote. In American society,
Punishment has been in existence since the early colonial period and has continued throughout history as a method used to deter criminals from committing criminal acts. Philosophers believe that punishment is a necessity in today’s modern society as it is a worldwide response to crime and violence. Friedrich Nietzche’s book “Punishment and Rehabilitation” reiterates that “punishment makes us into who we are; it creates in us a sense of responsibility and the ability to take and release our social obligations” (Blue, Naden, 2001). Immanuel Kant believes that if an individual commits a crime then punishment should be inflicted upon that individual for the crime committed. Cesare Beccaria, also believes that if there is a breach of the law by individuals then that individual should be punished accordingly.
they? - do two wrongs make a right?) but why is it so important that