What Is Net Neutrality
explanatory Essay
1180 words
Page 2:The Internet is a boundless system used for the individual to enhance, and occasionally consume their internal programming of a daily schedule, their life. It has not only transformed how humans interact and communicate with one another, but has offered a new form of government involvement.
Thesis: The government has influences all around us, from blank to blank. The influence of the Internet is in doubt tapping in on an individuals privacy with the I DONT KNOW WHAT TO SAY FOR MY THESIS.
Technology is taking over our ordinary lives daily.
56 percent of Americans own a smartphone.
Over 70 percent of United States adults keep their smartphone within five feet of them at all time .
The word “internet” is 30 years old while its networks
…show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the internet has transformed how humans interact and communicate with one another, and offered a new form of government involvement.
- Opines that the internet is in doubt tapping in on an individual's privacy with the i dont know what to say for my thesis.
- Explains that the internet is 30 years old and its networks surpass the age, including the simple email at age 40. the advanced research projects agency network was created as a project for the u.s.
- Explains that the internet has taken space in rooms and in the mindset of individuals, and now forced their presence in ordinary objects that find themselves in a home.
- Explains that the chairman of the federal communications committee, tom wheeler, proposed new regulations that prohibit internet providers from slowing or blocking legal data from the consumer.
- Explains that supporters of the net neutrality act want the federal communications committee to reclassify broadband isps as common carriers. netflix signed a deal with internet providers comcast and verizon that increases the speed and quality of their streaming on the providers networks.
- Explains that individuals opposed to net neutrality are speaking out and arguing that it is a limited commodity.
- Explains that the federal communications committee is forced to obtain a new set of rules due to the previous guidelines being dis guarded by federal courts in january, 2014.
- Explains that the use of "white space" has been approved unanimously for broadband, an important advancement for the federal communications committee.
Net Neutrality, or Internet Neutrality, is a source of extensive debate on the stage of modern technology that questions whether it should be allowed to be required by law. Net Neutrality is a principal that allows internet providers to enable access to all content regardless of the sources. The new rules would require that all content be equally viewed for the consumers. However, this excludes heart-rate monitors and other special services allowing them to be unaffected with the new rules. So in terms for the average individual; providers including Comcast, Verizon, including other giants of the communicating industry treat all data and trafficking equally. This idea has opened the doors of debate to question whether the United States government should turn Net Neutrality into law; and adds another motive to examine the governments slowly and lingering presence in our lives, will it ever go too far? Supporters of the Net Neutrality Act want the Federal Communications Committee to reclassify broadband ISP’s as common carriers. This would have companies give the same service to every customer, unlike “paid prioritization”. Netflix, a movie and tv show streaming provider recently signed a deal with internet providers Comcast and Verizon that increases the speed and quality of their streaming on the providers networks; Netflix is one of the bigger supporters of Net Neutrality . Some advocates claim that rules should be in place to expedite the priority of internet
Related
- analytical
- explanatory
- opinion
- comparative
- The Debate Over Net Neutrality Lawsanalytical essayIn 2005, Vonage, a phone company that transmits telephone calls over the internet or voice over internet protocol, complains to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) about an unknown service provider blocking their telephone service. The FCC investigated the complaint and found that Madison River, a telephone company, was responsible and ordered them to stop blocking data sent from Vonage (Higginbotham, 2010). This incident was one of the first cases of an internet service provider discriminating against data sent over the internet because Vonage and Madison River are competing telephone service companies. Because of this, the FCC proposed a set of principles which sparked the beginning of net neutrality legislation that has been submitted to Congress over the past few years (Higginbotham, 2010). “Preserving the open internet” is the latest net neutrality legislation and aims to set some basic rules in order to maintain fairness on the internet for consumers, businesses, content providers, and service providers. Public interest groups and content providers fear tiered pricing structures and data discrimination and hope “Preserving the open internet” legislation is passed to protect them, while internet service providers argue they need to maximize their network efficiency and profitability to produce innovative products and services and stand against the proposed “Preserving the open internet” legislation.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that vonage, a phone company that transmits telephone calls over the internet, complained to the federal communications commission (fcc) about an unknown service provider blocking their telephone service.
- Explains that the fcc drafted a set of principles that were used as guidelines to follow in governing over complaints, which caused the net neutrality debate to gain attention by the media.
- Explains that public interest groups and net neutrality supporters want legislation passed to prohibit internet service providers from blocking data sent over the internet.
- Explains that content providers and net neutrality advocates fear tiered pricing structures, similar to cable television and wireless service of cell phones.
- Argues that innovation and fair competition on the internet is in jeopardy unless legislation is passed to protect an open internet. the internet enables small and large businesses to compete with each other due to the minimal capital required to be competitive in the online marketplace.
- Argues that passing the "preserving the open internet" legislation may prohibit expansion of their networks and quality of service.
- Explains that internet providers argue that the internet is already neutral and that "preserving the open internet" legislation is not needed. cable companies claim that they only inspect data to optimize routing to achieve maximum efficiency.
- Explains that internet service providers claim that the fcc should not be governing the internet at all.
- Opines that the debate over passing "preserving the open internet" legislation can finally come to an end as the legislation was recently passed by the fcc and will go into effect on november 1, 2011.
- Cites cesarini, p. (2008, november 14). dueling data. the chronicle of higher education retrieved.
- Cites greenfield, r. (2006, june). the net neutrality debate: the basics.
- Cites higginbotham, s. and plumer, b. (2010, december 4). why it’s time to put an end to the net-neutrality debate.
1635 wordsRead More - Persuasive Essay On Net Neutralityexplanatory essayOn any given day in 2015, you would be hard-pressed to walk into a room at random in America without encountering a Smart Phone. There is hardly a library left that does not feature a quiet chorus of clicking keyboards from the laptops within. We are, in essence, permanently plugged in to the Great and Powerful Internet, and we rely on service providers (ISP’s) to provide us with this now-important resource. Lately, though, getting Internet is becoming less and less simple as folks debate the enforcement of Internet— or “net”— neutrality in the United States. There are a lot of inflated egos arguing back and forth on the subject, and the phrase “net neutrality” is becoming widely recognized amongst every day Internet users. But how many of these people actually get what is going on, here? What is net neutrality, and why are household net surfers and economists alike getting
In this essay, the author
- Explains that net neutrality is a concept that ensures consistent and unbiased web access to consumers, higher wifi bill, and level playing field for economic growth.
- Explains that net neutrality isn't synonymous with a free internet. it dictates that service providers must provide internet resources at certain rates regardless of how the consumer utilizes them.
- Explains that net neutrality does play a role in how service providers and the people who influence them control what the public sees and does not see.
- Explains that internet censorship is not without its cost to the consumer. delivering the world wide web to every person who needs it, and in the quantities which they use, requires a vast infrastructure.
- Explains that net neutrality plays heavily into macroeconomics as well as smaller-scale micro economics. this is bigger than people's personal fees at home versus individual companies taking up bandwidth.
- Opines that net neutrality has its own benefits and shortcomings in both business and the home, and there are well-informed individuals who disagree on whether it is worth pursuing.
1109 wordsRead More - Net Neutralityanalytical essayAlthough the net neutrality debate didn’t come into the spot light so long ago, it has sparked controversy in the communications world. This concept provides a positive impact to the consumers, competition and network owners/internet service providers. It broadens the aspect of equality, which the open Internet was first based on. The profound effects on the aforementioned players provide a supported purpose to regulate the notion of net neutrality.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the enigma of information flow is the central concern of net neutrality.
- Explains that the concept of net neutrality is the affirming concept behind the openness of the net.
- Argues that net neutrality prevents anti-competitive acts by network owners due to their differential in pricing and control of information.
- Explains that net neutrality is based around the concept of isps controlling the flow of information and whether it would be favorable or unfavorable.
- Explains that to regulate the net means to apply a control which would prevent an isp from raising prices to content providers.
- Explains that the net neutrality debate has sparked controversy in the communications world. it provides a positive impact to consumers, competition, and network owners/internet service providers.
- Argues that net neutrality has provided equality to all impacted parties in a positive and beneficial way.
1150 wordsRead More - Pros And Cons Of Net Neutralityopinion essaynet neutrality should be required by law. Many people have raised concerns about the power that
In this essay, the author
- Explains net neutrality is an issue of whether the government should get involved when it comes to net neutrality.
- Opines that net neutrality should be required by law. many people have raised concerns about the power that net neutrality has.
- Opines that net neutrality is crucial in allowing internet users to receive the content that they desire.
- Opines that competing content will make it much easier for people to search for content.
- Argues that net neutrality would allow the free flow of user-provided content and thus, promote creativity.
- Explains that net neutrality is required by law to prohibit providers from charging different prices by site, content, or user.
- Opines that the net neutrality debate is one of several sites of struggles to adapt and redefine rights.
- Opines that regulations could shape the future of the internet and influence the level and distribution of its benefits
- Argues that companies will be able to create cost structures which could hamper user access and services, making it easier for us to communicate online.
- Explains verizon, time warner cable, and comcast will be able to block content that they do not approve of, reject applications that compete with their own and offer the fastest loading speeds to the public.
- Explains that internet service providers can enhance their own web content and services.
- Explains that many isps decided that net neutrality is not profitable and are trying to charge in demand websites like netflix, google, and facebook a premium fee to guarantee the best service to their users.
- Explains that a new start-up company may not be capable of paying the premium price that those other large websites are able to afford, which turns potential users away.
- Argues that if facebook and google are allowed to pick between their customers by enhancing certain search results, why can't the internet service companies do the same?
- Argues that without net neutrality, users will pay more for the same service, have less creative freedom, and have a harder time finding the search results they need.
797 wordsRead More - Argumentative Essay On Net Neutralitycomparative essayThe internet has grown immensely ever since it first started around the time August of 1960 when it was just a proof of concept at MIT. Now the internet is felt like it is a necessity, we must be able to access it all of the time with our smart phones with no more that the fastest speeds possible. The idea of net neutrality is to keep the internet free, and not to priorities speeds for companies who will pay more for it. Consequentialism and the justice theory are helping fight the argument on wither it is wright or wrong. Net neutrality is an idea that needs to be keep because it gives everyone the same chance of accomplishing goals on the internet and freedom of speech.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the idea of net neutrality is to keep the internet free, and not to prioritize speeds for companies who will pay more for it.
- Explains that when the internet first started, it was planned to be uncontrolled by any one private person or company. the federal communications commission (fcc) made a press release saying that they would start to allow internet service providers to control the speed of people internet speed more than they did.
- Explains that net neutrality relates to consequentialism because people are selfish by nature. james rachel helped develop the idea of ethical egoism that encourages one to act in one’s beset interest first.
- Explains that the justice theory by john rawls can inspire within arguments of idea of net neutrality. the principle of equal liberty states that everyone has as much liberty as possible.
- Concludes that net neutrality is the idea of not letting the fcc control the internet and make companies pay more to have faster and better internet.
1159 wordsRead More - The Issue Of Net Neutralityexplanatory essayThere has been no previous issue overseen by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that has ever come close to provoking as much attention as the FCC’s 2014 Open Internet Rulemaking (Mehta, 2015). “Net Neutrality”, the term which prohibits the discrimination of Internet data by the telephone and cable companies based on type of content, source of content, device on which it is accessed etc. is wrangling around for quite some time now. It is only after more than a decade of rigorous discussions, lawsuits and power changes at the FCC that a decision was made in favor of net neutrality on February 26, 2015.
In this essay, the author
- Explains the fcc's 2014 open internet rulemaking, which prohibits the discrimination of internet data by the telephone and cable companies based on type of content, source, device on which it is accessed.
- Explains that net neutrality has been a hot topic in the tech industry since the early parts of the twenty-first century. the paper will focus on the extent to which net neutrality statutory regulation should be restrictive in order to make communication and technological advancements better with the internet.
- Explains the goal of this paper on "net neutrality" is to cover all these issues starting from the brief origins of net neuterity and important milestones to the most recent fcc decisions on this issue.
- Analyzes how at&t blocked video-calling apps to promote its own products and increase profits, violating net neutrality. fcc has established net neutrality rules to prevent companies from manipulating data.
- Explains net neutrality is an equal playing field for everyone. it is the idea that any network traffic such as movies, mp3, videos, pictures can move from one place to any other place without discrimination or slowing down transfer of data.
- Explains how the communications act of 1934 and the telecommunications act, 1996, laid the foundation for net neutrality, defining that internet service providers should treat all internet traffic equally.
- Explains that the fcc clarified that broadband internet access is an information service not a telecommunications service under the 1934 communications act.
- Explains that madison river telephone company blocked vonage voip services in 2005, and the fcc created four open internet principles as a policy statement.
805 wordsRead More - The Problem of Internet Regulation in the U.S. Todayanalytical essayMany Americans today rely on the Internet for two main reasons: information and connectivity. Some may consider it as the biggest library available because of the endless information it can provide. It further enhanced people’s knowledge of what’s going on all around the globe and has been proved to be a very powerful tool that is available for anyone to use. Communication improved not just here in the United States of America, but also in other countries thanks to social media. Despite of all this, there is still an evident problem for American citizens when it comes to Internet Regulation. There’s an apparent government intervention when it comes to regulating the Internet. Under net neutrality, companies shouldn’t restrict what and how much information or media users can access. Every citizen deserves Internet freedom, which is also tied with privacy and the identity of the people using the Internet. The government should protect its citizens from the threats of the Internet like bullying and stalking, and fraud or theft issues like compromised credit card or bank account information from phishing websites and hackers.
In this essay, the author
- Explains net neutrality is the guiding principle that maintains the open and free internet. it assures a level playing field for all websites and internet technologies.
- Explains that online piracy is a problem that some citizens in the u.s. are concerned about.
- Explains that the bill supports net neutrality and preserving an open internet. they state that transparency, no blocking, and no unreasonable discrimination are the three basic rules endorsed by the fcc.
- Opines that the open internet preservation act of 2014 would be the most reasonable and applicable solution to address the current issue with today’s internet regulation.
- Opines that the internet should be just the way it is, with the right amount of government intervention.
- Explains online piracy in numbers - facts and statistics (infographic). go-gulf.
- Analyzes the problem of internet regulation in the u.s.
- Opines that the open internet preservation act of 2014 provides a fair solution to internet regulation in the united states.
- Explains that the stop online piracy act, introduced by rep. lamar smith in the 112th congress, has died and was not enacted.
- Explains that 70% of the public finds online piracy socially acceptable.
- Analyzes fairfield, joshua a. t., "do-not-track" as contract." vanderbilt journal of entertainment & technology law 14.3 (2012): 545-602.
- Summarizes internet usage statistics, population and telecom reports for the americas.
- Analyzes the decision in verizon vs. fcc: a legal analysis. the open internet preservation bill is counter-productive.
2640 wordsRead More - Internet Freedom: The Information Superhighwayanalytical essayOne of the nicknames for the Internet when it was first released to the public was the “information superhighway”. The name came to be because the Internet provides the average person with fast access to a limitless amount of data. For many, this is the type of Internet that they have grown to love and rely on while for others, the information superhighway is slowed by major roadblocks in the form of Internet censorship. With the Internet being relatively new, the contradictory messages that both governments and corporations are sending to the public are being strictly scrutinized. Roughly 2.5 billion people currently use the Internet and another 2.5 billion individuals are expected to go online by the end of this decade (Negroponte). The Freedom House predicts that most of the people that are connecting to the Internet for the first time will be in countries where speech freedom is severely censored; entire families could be thrown in jail or worse (Schmidt). There is an insidious world war currently underway but it is very easy to lose sight of it even though the stakes are enormous. There is a silent reminder with every stroke of the keyboard, that there is a war over the control of the Internet. Despite the controversy surrounding Internet censorship, the fact that governments could potentially censor things they deem undesirable could take away from the fundamental freedom not only nationally but internationally as well.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the internet was nicknamed the "information superhighway" because it provides the average person with fast access to a limitless amount of data.
- Argues that the internet is open, secure, and resilient as it was designed and evolved this way. however, governments are increasingly seeking control of their own domestic spheres and the flow of data and information between countries.
- Analyzes how internet freedom has become an area of rare consensus in congress. the measure affirms the importance of an internet free from censorship and government control and codifies the existing management structure of the internet.
- Argues that governments in democracies are starting to look at the sort of mass monitoring of information and communications data that previously only authoritarian regimes would consider.
- Analyzes how the citizens of turkey are agitated about the government's heavy-handed role in censoring the internet. they are willing to take on rubber bullets and tear-gas because they understand the far-reaching effects.
- Explains the reasons for censorship, from child porn to authoritarian regimes attempting to control a nation's access to information.
- Opines that it may be decades before the internet reaches its full potential as a conduit for information exchange.
- Opines that the global repercussions of censorship are so severe. the open and global internet is unlikely to continue to flourish without deliberate action to promote and defend it.
- Explains that n.p. sirs issues researcher. web. 12 may. 2014. negroponte, eric e, and jared cohen.
2001 wordsRead More - But, it is also important to note that all of this could have been avoided if the Federal Communications Commission had the foresight to call broadband providers "common carriers." A common carrier easily falls under Title II of the Communications Act. But, under the decision, any Net Neutrality anti-blocking rules are deemed unlawful. So, the Federal Communications Commission does not have the authority to impose or enforce rules that would give the free market favor against the politically and economically powerful network provider.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that verizon communications argued that it was wrong and unreasonable for the federal communications commission to regulate and set leasing rates for networks.
- Explains that verizon successfully argued that the federal communications commission isn't authorized to require a state utility commission to set rates for lease of network elements to competitive local exchange carriers.
- Explains the telecommunications act of 1996 gives us a better understanding of what type of authoritative power the federal communications commission actually has.
- Describes the duty of an incumbent local exchange carrier to provide nondiscriminatory access to network elements on an unbundled basis at any technically feasible point.
- Explains that network providers cannot discriminate against users and must provide equal access to network elements. however, what they choose to do with said elements is an entirely different story.
- Analyzes the implications of the verizon v. federal communications commission court case.
- Explains that a common carrier falls under title ii of the communications act, but any net neutrality anti-blocking rules are deemed unlawful. the federal communications commission cannot impose or enforce rules that would give the free market favor against the politically and economically powerful network provider.
652 wordsRead More - Explain Why The Government Should Not Be In Charge Of Internetanalytical essay"The government should not be in charge of the internet. The reason why that the government should not be in charge of our network is because, if the government would be in charge of our network it would not be fair for some people because the government would say everybody has to pay more money and would have to pay more in taxes. Net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites. Instead of trying to regulate the Internet, these rules should be repealed in order to promote competition and innovation in the broadband market, which will result in more choices and better products for Americans at lower prices. Example when there is a big family and they use netflix, youtube, and hulu a lot and then there is one person that lives by him/her selves lives and don’t use those websites that much the government would make the one person pay as much as the big family would.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites.
- States that net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites.
- Argues that the government should not be in charge of the internet because the cost would increase for everyone.
- Argues that the government should not be in charge of the internet to promote competition and innovation in the broadband market.
- Explains that net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites.
655 wordsRead More