Comparison:

By an initial view of the Core Logic’s ratio results and the industry’s one can presume that Core Logic is suffering in multiple categories however these figures are deceiving. The greatest ratio deficit between Core Logic and the rest of the industry is the return on equity ratio. The average industry percentage was 102% while Core Logic sits at 2.8%, however that is because one competitor specifically has a percentage of 1200, which lifts the industry average up. If we subtracted that group the industry average would be 18.8%. However Core Logic is still on the lower end of the Industry. Another ratio Core Logic is lower than the industry average is the Profit Margin. Here, the average is 10.8% where Core Logic is at 7.3%, this*…show more content…*

In regards to the return on assets Core Logic again falls short with a .8% to the industry average 7%, here the industry shows about half are well above 10% while the other half are below 6%. The Current Ratio of Core Logic is 0.97 while the Industry is at 1.15, here Core Logic is closer to meeting the Industry average than the previous ratios. The same figures would be used for the quick ratio since both Core Logic and the industry don’t have inventory and because they don’t have inventory there are no inventory turnover ratios that apply. The company’s asset turnover ratio is at .40 whereas the industry average is at .77, in this category they’re tied for the lowest turnover rate, which shows their lack of performance in terms of revenue production. The last ratio comparison is the receivables turnover, where Core Logic has a turnover rate of 5.87 while the industry average is at 6.77. This could be suggesting that the company’s total sales*…show more content…*

Core Logic is lacking in its Net Income, which is why their percentage is so much lower than the other companies in the industry. If we were to increase their net income (change the numerator) their Return on equity would be higher and would make investors happier with a faster and higher return rate. Profit Margin’s for the data and information’s industry aren’t very high on average however Core Logic is 3% lower which suggests in theory that they’re missing three cents of profit for every dollar of revenue which in the long term hurts the company . I would recommend figuring out a way of increasing the company’s Net Income (Numerator of fraction) to increase the company’s profit margin; but by doing that it will affect both the return on assets and return on equity positively. By increasing the net income it will directly increase the ratio figures for each group, which is a positive effect since it helps those values close in on the industry average. Another area the company is lacking is in terms of their return on assets, they’re just above the positive percentage threshold, the return on assets shows the value of the company based on it assets and

By an initial view of the Core Logic’s ratio results and the industry’s one can presume that Core Logic is suffering in multiple categories however these figures are deceiving. The greatest ratio deficit between Core Logic and the rest of the industry is the return on equity ratio. The average industry percentage was 102% while Core Logic sits at 2.8%, however that is because one competitor specifically has a percentage of 1200, which lifts the industry average up. If we subtracted that group the industry average would be 18.8%. However Core Logic is still on the lower end of the Industry. Another ratio Core Logic is lower than the industry average is the Profit Margin. Here, the average is 10.8% where Core Logic is at 7.3%, this

In regards to the return on assets Core Logic again falls short with a .8% to the industry average 7%, here the industry shows about half are well above 10% while the other half are below 6%. The Current Ratio of Core Logic is 0.97 while the Industry is at 1.15, here Core Logic is closer to meeting the Industry average than the previous ratios. The same figures would be used for the quick ratio since both Core Logic and the industry don’t have inventory and because they don’t have inventory there are no inventory turnover ratios that apply. The company’s asset turnover ratio is at .40 whereas the industry average is at .77, in this category they’re tied for the lowest turnover rate, which shows their lack of performance in terms of revenue production. The last ratio comparison is the receivables turnover, where Core Logic has a turnover rate of 5.87 while the industry average is at 6.77. This could be suggesting that the company’s total sales

Core Logic is lacking in its Net Income, which is why their percentage is so much lower than the other companies in the industry. If we were to increase their net income (change the numerator) their Return on equity would be higher and would make investors happier with a faster and higher return rate. Profit Margin’s for the data and information’s industry aren’t very high on average however Core Logic is 3% lower which suggests in theory that they’re missing three cents of profit for every dollar of revenue which in the long term hurts the company . I would recommend figuring out a way of increasing the company’s Net Income (Numerator of fraction) to increase the company’s profit margin; but by doing that it will affect both the return on assets and return on equity positively. By increasing the net income it will directly increase the ratio figures for each group, which is a positive effect since it helps those values close in on the industry average. Another area the company is lacking is in terms of their return on assets, they’re just above the positive percentage threshold, the return on assets shows the value of the company based on it assets and

Related

- Satisfactory Essays
## Why should not invest in Exxon – A comparative Analysis

- 1478 Words
- 6 Pages

Exxon ratios are fluctuating within 1.0 to 0.84, whereas Chevron ratio is always greater than 1.50. This clearly indicates that Chevron is in better position in meeting its obligations when compared to Exxon. If this decline continues for Exxon then there are chances where the company cannot meet up its short-term obligations and lead to financial distress. Quick ratio: It is another indicator of liquidity which is determined by subtracting inventory from the current assets and dividing by current liabilities. Inventories are less liquid asset, so it is eliminated in determining this ratio.

- 1478 Words
- 6 Pages

Satisfactory Essays - Good Essays
## Company Financial Analysis: BMO Life Insurance Company

- 728 Words
- 3 Pages

Meaning RBC isn’t operating in efficiency compared to its industry. BMO, RBC and Sun Life Insurance comparison Of the three insurance companies Sun life has the highest profit margin. Meaning it is operating more efficiently and earning more per $1 in sales than its two competitors. Whereas, RBC has the lowest profit margin of the three; which is not favourable. When it comes to days’ sales uncollected, BMO has the highest number of days.

- 728 Words
- 3 Pages

Good Essays - Satisfactory Essays
## Citibank Case Study

- 1155 Words
- 5 Pages

It is calculated as: Total assets divide by total equity. As equity multiplier calculates leverage, the higher EM indicates that a bigger portion of asset financing is being used through debt. The smaller amount of equity multiplier is better, because it spends less money to fund an asset. As we can see on the tables, the EM of Citi Group was 12.161 times in 2009 and 11.706 times in 2015 respectively, it had decreased by 0.455 times due to bigger increase in total equity which was $154.17 billion dollars in 2009 and $157.33 billion dollars in 2010. In general, both Citi bank Group and Bank of America used less equity capital to funds their assets after financial crisis.

- 1155 Words
- 5 Pages

Satisfactory Essays - Better Essays
## Financial Analysis

- 1159 Words
- 5 Pages
- 14 Works Cited

The EPS ratio for PPGL shows a decreasing trend, as it drops from $2.76 in 2009 to -$31.96 in 2013 with its peak in 2011 at $3.19. This reflects the decreasing profitability ratios. HGHL on the other hand shows an overall percentage increase of 45.61% as over the five year period, the ratio rises from $21.97 to $31.99 in 2013. HGHL is the safer company to invest in because the ratio shows there are more earnings per share available to investors. The DPS ratio allows shareholders to examine the proportion of earning that will be paid out as dividends.

- 1159 Words
- 5 Pages
- 14 Works Cited

Better Essays - Satisfactory Essays
## SIA Industry Analysis

- 1550 Words
- 7 Pages

Receivables Turnover: With a lower receivables turnover ratio than the industry, SIA should consider reviewing its credit policies to ensure timely collection of imparted credit that is not earning interest for the firm. Profitability Analysis Sales: SIA's revenue has been increasing for the last 2 years since FYE2005. However, this growth has slowed down from double digit growth to 8.6% recently. This is not a concern as SIA is still considered as one of the more profitable companies in the industry as shown in its Net Income and Operating profit ratios. With the new addition of A380s they will also be able to charge higher prices.

- 1550 Words
- 7 Pages

Satisfactory Essays - Satisfactory Essays
## Analysis Of IOCL

- 1233 Words
- 5 Pages

The earnings per share for both the companies is following a zigzag trend due the change in net income for the respective years. In the years 2010 and 2011 the earning per share of IOCL has decreased in comparison to HPCL due to increase in number of shares from 119.47 to 242.7. The share capital of IOCL is quite large in comparison HPCL i.e. IOCL’s equity share capital is 2427.95(crore)and that of HPCL is of 339.1(crore) but the profit earned by the company is not much in contrast to each other so EPS of IOCL is in same range as of HPCL.

- 1233 Words
- 5 Pages

Satisfactory Essays - Good Essays
## Ratio Analysis: Eastman Kodak's Cash Flow Statement

- 1461 Words
- 6 Pages

Kodak’s debt ratio has been improving since 2012 when it was considerably above 1. Their 2014 debt ratio is 0.89, which is very close to Hewlett-Packard and Sony. The debt-to-equity ratio of Kodak is the first signal within the ratios that the company is not performing well. Generally, this ratio should be below 1 and for Kodak in 2014 it was 8.83. Their equity is almost non-existent and this is signaling very weak balance sheet strength.

- 1461 Words
- 6 Pages

Good Essays - Good Essays
## Ebay Case Study

- 1040 Words
- 5 Pages

Since the assets exceeded the liabilities (debt) closely, one could infer that this year was not viewed as profitable. In 2013, the assets were much higher than the liabilities which expressed that this was a better year than 2014 was. According to these figures, the hit eBay took in 2014 could possibly be why the stock dropped around $30 less. The price is currently going up but not by much at all. Some new efforts are likely to be the cause of the current stock price corresponding to the year before

- 1040 Words
- 5 Pages

Good Essays - Powerful Essays
## Business Analysis: Liquidity Ratio

- 1073 Words
- 5 Pages

This ratio shows how much company earned on the money of shareholders. In 2012, ROE is deeply negative at 44.4% but in 2013, it got significantly improved and touched 6.5%. However, it can’t be treated as a healthy figure but in comparison to profit margin or operating ratio, it is a respectable one. Return on Assets (ROA) is defined as net profit/total assets. This ratio shows the earnings on employed assets.

- 1073 Words
- 5 Pages

Powerful Essays - Good Essays
## How To Evaluate Stock

- 841 Words
- 4 Pages

Invest in a company’s stock only if its market cap is higher than a hundred million or more. Tips: • The price to earnings ratio (P/E ratio), calculated by dividing the share price by the company’s annual net income, is the most commonly used measure for evaluating a stock. • Stocks having a higher P/E ratio than the market are considered to be more expensive. • However, don’t go for stocks giving low P/E ratio because even though they are cheap they might not be good stocks.

- 841 Words
- 4 Pages

Good Essays