A forcible rape you want to look at bruises semen stains or witnesses that may have heard screaming. Things like this are very important for an investigator to know to look for (Bennett & Hess, 71). As you can see there are many different steps in investigating crime scenes. It is very important that an officer follow the proper steps in an investigation. Failure to do this can result in a suspect to go free, possible charges against the department.
They must always make sure the evidence supports the hypothesis, if not they must start back over. For me I feel that if there was no scientific method it would make the job of criminal investigators and even forensic examiners jobs a lot harder. What would happen if we had no scientific methods? Many crimes and cases in the world would go unsolved. If forensic experts had no scientific methods when examining crimes scenes or looking at evidences in labs then many cases would be lost in court.
There are various situations where one or many people are accused of committing a certain crime. Ideally, the crime is then reported to the officer who proceeds to arrest the accused. However, sometimes different scenarios play out and one who may think they are in the right may be wrong. Because of these different instances, police officers should wear body cameras in order to capture what happens when he or she makes an arrest. This is due are recent events where criminals and police officers have been accused of something by the other party that they may have not actually done.
People may feel that they con not report crimes like rape because it is uncomfortable to talk to the police about it. If research showed this then police could be trained to deal with victims in a more caring manner. My hypothesis I expect to find that the official crime statistics in my area do not reflect the actual crime rate. I expect this because it is obvious that not all crime is reported to the police. Many people do not report crime that they feel is too petty and where they cannot gain anything from reporting it (e.g.
Officers also now inform the suspect of all the terrible things they may face if they’re convicted of the crime, and seem to help the suspect by promising a less severe punishment if the cooperate with the police. “For a while, police tried such things as polygraphs to determine if the suspect was being deceptive, but polygraphs and polygraph training are expensive, and the results are almost never admissible in court” (Layton, 2011).... ... middle of paper ... ...y had not committed. The 104 participants were paired up, one being the interrogator and the other being the suspect for a mock theft. Some of the suspects were to be labeled as “guilty” while others were labeled as “not guilty”. The interrogators had 10 minutes to as questions, and then report back to the judge their opinion and how confident their opinion was.
The prosecution, however, must provide evidence to argue beyond any doubt that the accused party is guilty of their crime. A prosecuting attorney will often be a government worker whose job is to carry out legal action against someone accused of a crime (WiseGEEK). They often work with investigators and the police in order to collect evidence they can use to solidify their case in advance for the day of the trial. A prosecuting attorney determines how severe of a charge will be brought against the accused, and sometimes will offer a lighter charge to the defendant if they will plead guilty or no contest. Someone seeking ... ... middle of paper ... ...ould be falsely convicted, and those who are guilty could get away with their crimes.
If an officer is being rude or discriminating against a suspect, then that suspect may act in a more vicious manner. This could result in the officer deciding to use force. All officers may see a threat differently, resulting in different disciplinary actions. The use of force rules vary in different police departments. This is concerning to some because the citizens may feel that they are not being treated as equal as others.
James and the police officer which led to Mr. James killing the officer. Although, this is the first hearing the prosecutor will have to give all of their relevant information from any investigation that occurred with the case. Furthermore, they will have to give reasons to why this case should be tried within the jurisdiction for which it happens according to the law. Unfortunately, the defense has an opportunity to object to any evidence that the prosecutor may have in the case. There is also the pretrial motion where the defense attorney can seek an exclusion for irrelevant prosecution information as well as evidence that does not go with the case in order to take it to a trial court.
The community will greatly be affected because if they distrust the officers then they will take matters in their own hand and the congress would have to put them in quarantine and isolation statues for their behavior thus giving them a time when they can be outside and a time when they cannot be outside. This also shows that the “Distrust of police has serious consequences. It undermines the legitimacy of law enforcement, and without legitimacy police lose their ability and authority to function effectively”. This mean that the officers will not make a difference in that community because no one in that community trust them or let them do their job because the officers will lose the authority they once
That, in turn, causes citizens to rely less on the police when they need help. DiLascio supports that idea in paragraph six of her article, it states that: When police are accused of inappropriate conduct, and when this conduct is either not thoroughly investigated or is dismissed in court, it causes people to question whether the police are really acting in the best interest of the community. This, in turn, makes people hesitate to go to the police when they do need help. DiLascio’s words are crucial when explaining how members of a community feel towards the police force. Many people feel negatively towards the police and the justice system when claims of misconduct go un-investigated.