What Are The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

778 Words2 Pages

In the summer of 6th August, a uranium atomic bomb also known as Little Boy was dropped on Hiroshima. Few days later on 9th August, the second uranium atomic bomb also known as Fat Man was dropped on the city of Nagasaki. The bombs, as described by observers caused a flash and went up about 570 meters above the city, vaporization anything or anyone that was anywhere near the explosion. Both of these bombs ended the war in a swift manner and spared the lives of many American soldiers. However, the total causalities for both bombs was 199,000 (atomicarchive.com). As always, there are two sides to every story. Many Americans that day, including President Harry Truman, General Douglas MacArthur, and a couple of the Manhattan Project scientists saw the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a necessity to end the war. While many other people argued …show more content…

Hulme also appeals to the opposing side by mentioning that yes, dropping the atomic bombs was a very disgusting move, however, in order to potentially spare the lives of more marines the only option was dropping the bombs, and that in his eyes is justified. Going further, Hulme notes that the United States had one goal in their mind, and that goal was to end the war as swiftly and easy as possible. Further on, Hulme explains to his readers that those two bombs alone had “The explosive power of the payload of 2,000 B-29s,” meaning that those bombs saved a lot of resources for the United States and a lot of bomb missions and that according to Hulme, “freed up resources that could be utilized for the war effort elsewhere.” Additionally, Hulme mentions that the bombs did not only end the war in a swift manner, but they also proved US dominance over the USSR and kept them “In line.” After the atomic bombs the United States became the world’s greatest power and held that record for four years

Open Document