What Are The Pros And Cons Of Mercy Killing

1470 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: euthanasia ethical and moral issues

Mercy Killing As I have studied mercy killing through research and assignments I realized there is more to it than I thought. Mercy killing is taking someone’s life without the patient’s permission. It happens when someone feels that death is in the patient’s best interest to relieve pain or suffering. While conducting my research I found that another word for mercy killing is euthanasia, which I will be using periodically throughout my paper. I have research many views on the topic and I learned that most of them are due to personal life matters. I am going to present the pros and cons of mercy killing,
First I am going to state the pros of mercy killing and why each of them are important to people. According to www.english-online.at everyone …show more content…

For example, merry killing is legalized in the Netherlands and they have only had a few small problems. To make the system work correctly laws have to be made that will distinguish between euthanasia and murder. Next I am going to present a few views on the cons of mercy killing. According to “the book” euthanasia is a direct violation of The Value of Life Principle. The principle states that “human life should be preserved, protected, and valued; sometimes referred to as the Sanctity of Life principle”. When mercy killing takes place it involves taking the life of an innocent person. No matter what the situation murder is murder, especially in the mercy killing situation because the patient does not have the decision to take their life or not.
The domino argument also takes place against mercy killing. If the patient is unresponsive and they cannot make a decision for themselves someone has to make a life/death decision in their place. The question is; who actually has the right to say the plug can be pulled or that no other medical procedures should be done to try and prolong the patient’s life. Who is the one that is allowed to make the decision of “ending” the life of another person when that person has no say so in the matter? The patient may be considered unimportant or meaningless to one person but to another their life may be …show more content…

According to www.bbc.uk most Christians are not for euthanasia because they believe that each individual’s life is given by God. Participating in mercy killing would mean that the natural process of dearth is no longer available. God made mankind in his image and everyone is valuable to him. People do not look like him but he gives us the opportunity to understand good from bad and he wants us to make good decisions in life. Whether someone has a physical handicap, mental ill, or in a vegetative state of mind their value is the same as someone with no disability. In Gods eye each and every person is equal and has a purpose in

Show More
Related

  • Mercy Killing In Of Mice And Men

    422 Words  | 1 Pages

    Mercy killing is the act of taking someone’s life painlessly. Victims of mercy killing “include persons who are in a vegetative state or those who suffer from an incurable and painful disease or condition.” People argue and refute mercy killing whether it is acceptable or not. It is neither acceptable nor wrong, arguably it is required to be a necessity when dealing with cases when there are no other options than surviving in the world in misery. In Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck’s character, Lennie, mentally ill, has committed a treacherous act of murder by mere accident because he was panicked. He is mercy killed by his close friend and sort of master, George, so that he will no longer be in misery and suffering. Mercy killing is a

    Read More

  • Bonnie Steinbock The Morality Of Euthanasia

    1590 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this essay, I will discuss whether euthanasia is morally permissible or not. Euthanasia is the intention of ending life due to inevitable pain and suffering. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek words “eu,” which means good, and “thanatosis, which means death. There are two types of euthanasia, active and passive. Active euthanasia is when medical professionals deliberately do something that causes the patient to die, such as giving lethal injections. Passive euthanasia is when a patient dies because the medical professionals do not do anything to keep them alive or they stop doing something that was keeping them alive. Some pros of euthanasia is the freedom to decide your destiny, ending the pain, and to die with dignity. Some cons

    Read More

  • The Hippocratic Oaths: The Use Of Euthanasia

    1678 Words  | 4 Pages

    Euthanasia is a word derived from Greek that has the etymological meaning of an easy death through the alleviation of pain (Moreno, 1995). Through the course of history, the signification of the term has changed and evolved in many different definitions. A useful definition of euthanasia on which we will base this essay, is named ‘mercy killing’, which signifies deliberately putting an end to someone’s life to avoid further suffering, as stated by Michael Manning in 1998. The euthanasia debate possesses a strong significance in our modern society. A discussion conducted by both scholars and politicians is going on whether physicians have the right to hasten the death of an individual by the administration of poison. In this essay

    Read More

  • Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia

    1758 Words  | 4 Pages

    Those against it are equally worried about the victim’s situation in where their lives are taken away without their consent and at the same time, the possibility of a recovery. However, just because something is not accepted by society does not mean it is wrong, as the pro side of involuntary Euthanasia mentions, it would end with the victims’ pain by giving them a peaceful death. The reason to keep someone alive is to give him/her a new opportunity to fight for an improvement, if there no such thing the best option, although the hardest too, is to let the person rest in a better place, the positive fact about practicing Euthanasia is that the organs of the victim will save a life. On the other hand, a good effect of keeping someone alive is that the family will still see their loved one. Besides, they will save many legal problems because of Euthanasia still illegal in many countries. Both sides can agree that their cases in where their beliefs do not fit, as an example for the ones that support involuntary Euthanasia, if there a possibility to a recover they cannot kill the patient, they must keep him/her alive until the doctors said something different. In comparison, an exception for the con side that does not support involuntary

    Read More

  • Euthanasia is the Right to Live or Die

    509 Words  | 2 Pages

    Euthanasia is unnatural and should be stopped immediately. The opposing side says that it is mercy killing, but it is still killing. There are three important points when discussing this issue: what is euthanasia, the decision, and the doctor who performs this awful task.

    Read More

  • Euthanasia Pros

    821 Words  | 2 Pages

    The debate is on whether its right or wrong to kill patients. Some people believe it isn't humane and others believe euthanasia is the personal choice. Some are against view euthanasia as murder and that we must respect the value of life. Those who are in favor of euthanasia believe that euthanasia eliminates the patient’s pain and suffering. Allowing humans to suffer is more inhumane than killing. Pros main concerns are that we should have a right to our own body, saves from suffering, alternatives are often worse, and shouldn’t be forced alive. Cons main concerns are legalizing murder, abuse, religions, ethics, and devalues human life. The controversy will still remain whether the argument over freedom of choice and the moral issues is

    Read More

  • Exploring the Legalization of Euthanasia: A Closer Look

    1335 Words  | 3 Pages

    We are not God or nature, so we cannot have the power to decide the fate. This tends to be a strong religious perspective since euthanasia consists of the same act as suicide does and this is a sin, therefore the person will never go to heaven. Also another issue when it comes to religion is that the Doctor allowing this to happen gives an injection that basically kills another human being, so for some people this is murder and also a sin. It is a common belief that the person could change their mind after the injection is made, there would be no going back, their freedom would then be taken from them in that moment and they would lose control over their life. For many other people it is also deemed unnatural, we cannot decide what Mother Nature has in store for us, meaning we cannot choose and alter our fate. Our body must die on its own when the time comes and when it is meant for our bodies to

    Read More

  • The Argument of the Legality and Morality of Euthanasia

    644 Words  | 2 Pages

    The right to die debate posses a great number of legal, moral and ethical issues. Proponents and supporters of euthanasia had presented valid arguments: people have the right of self-determination and that is why they should be allowed to choose their own fate; is a better choice to assist an individual to die than obligate him/her to continue suffering; there is not significant difference between passive euthanasia which is often permitted and active euthanasia which is not permitted and allowing the practice of euthanasia will not necessarily lead to undesirable consequences.

    Read More

  • Egnisia And Religion: The Views Of Euthanasia

    2210 Words  | 5 Pages

    ​Euthanasia is and will always be one of the leading ethical issues present in the world. There are strong arguments present on both sides of the issue including that of one of the most influential institutions on the planet; the Catholic Church. The Church has, and always will be against the killing of a human being. This applies to euthanasia: “An action or omission which of itself and by intention causes death, with the purpose of eliminating all suffering.” (Pope John Paul II - Evangelium Vitae). The Church also refers to euthanasia as “assisted suicide” and the “mercy killing”. “Whatever its motives and means, direct euthanasia consists in putting an end to the lives of handicapped, sick, or dying persons. It is morally unacceptable. Thus an act or omission which, of itself or by intention, causes death in order to eliminate suffering constitutes a murder gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to the respect due to the living God, his Creator. The error of judgment into which one can fall in good faith does not change the nature of this murderous act, which must always be forbidden and excluded.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church – 2277).

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia

    1084 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some of the cons to euthanasia are emotional distress depression, may be deemed as suicide, and poses the question are you god? Emotional distress/depression is a big deal when choosing to euthanize. Family suffer (differently) as they either allow injections or let them take a pill. Another con will be is this suicide? As we know in certain religions suicide is seen as a sin. Suicide is a sin that is said to lead a person to hell, which brings us to our next question who can play god? Having control/ power to end one’s life is supposed to be a role for god ultimately. These are just a few cons to mercy killing/

    Read More

  • Euthanasi The Controversy Between Life And Death

    801 Words  | 2 Pages

    When debating if one should be support or oppose euthanasia issues that come to light are legal , medical, political and religious. In spit of these reasons to advocate euthanasia a large portion of society believes that Euthanasia thinks otherwise. Christians believe euthanasia disrespects the sanctity of life...

    Read More

  • Legalizing Euthanasia In Canada

    697 Words  | 2 Pages

    Euthanasia or mercy killing is ending the life of a patient who is very ill or injured. It is a topic that has been debated by many people. In many countries it is illegal to perform euthanasia, however, the province of Quebec has recently legalized Euthanasia. The Government of Canada is currently considering legalizing it. If euthanasia becomes authorized, many people will also distressed. The Government of Canada should not consider legalizing euthanasia because it violates medical ethics, it ignores religious beliefs, and patients under stress might make irrational decisions.

    Read More

  • Euthanasia Pros And Cons

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    Physician-Assisted Suicide is assisted suicide from a physician to a person to make it as painless and dignified as possible. There is also Euthanasia, which is to end a person life so they don’t have to go through any more pain and suffering without the patients consent. As of right now, only Montana, Oregon, Vermont and Washington have legalized Physician-Assisted suicide. To be eligible for Physician-assisted suicide, a patient must have a terminally ill disease. There are many pros and cons in this if you are having unbearable pain and want to end the suffering.

    Read More

  • Is Euthanasia Justified?

    1061 Words  | 3 Pages

    The world is full of people, some of which are suffering every day from pain. Even with the advancements that have been made with medicine, it’s not enough to cure many diseases or to heal a person’s pain. Euthanasia is commonly referred to as a “mercy killing”. It is the intentional act of putting a person to death quietly and painlessly who has an incurable or painful disease, it is intended to be an act of mercy. According to (ANA, 2013), Euthanasia is the act of putting to death someone suffering from a painful and prolonged illness or injury.

    Read More

  • A Defense of Euthanasia

    1271 Words  | 3 Pages

    More than likely, a good majority of people have heard about euthanasia at least once in their existence. For those out there who have been living under a rock their entire lives, euthanasia “is generally understood to mean the bringing about of a good death – ‘mercy killing’, where one person, ‘A’, ends the life of another person, ‘B’, for the sake of ‘B’.” (Kuhse 294). There are people who believe this is a completely logical scenario that should be allowed, and there are others that oppose this view. For the purpose of this essay, I will be defending those who are for euthanasia. My thesis, just by looking at this issue from a logical standpoint, is that if someone is suffering, I believe they should be allowed the right to end their lives, either by their own consent or by someone with the proper authority to make the decision. No living being should leave this world in suffering. To go about obtaining my thesis, I will first present my opponents view on the issue. I will then provide a Utilitarian argument for euthanasia, and a Kantian argument for euthanasia. Both arguments will have an objection from my opponent, which will be followed by a counter-objection from my standpoint.

    Read More

More about What Are The Pros And Cons Of Mercy Killing

Open Document