It is used today and was used in ancient times to punish a variety of crimes, Even the bible supports death for murder and other crimes like kidnapping and witchcraft. The Death Penalty is a controversial issue because there are people that state the Death Penalty is wrong and good in some way. Why do people oppose the Death penalty? Because the Person may not be guilty, A lot of people think it is wrong to take a life. It could be there religion or many other reasons and then there are people that just feel sorry for them.
Capital punishment has become a very controversial issue in the world. There are different views and opinions on capital punishment. It can be argued that the death penalty is an effective punishment, and necessary. Along with this, it can be argued that executing people is unethical and a non-effective punishment. First, some may say the death penalty is effective and necessary because it makes criminals think twice before committing a crime.
An easy way to answer these questions is to totally nullify capital punishment completely. One reason why the death penalty is so controversial is because many feel its cruel ways of punishment are unnecessary, even if the crime is murder, whether it be premeditated or unintentional. They believe there are other ways of condemnation besides execution. In the case of an unintentional death feelings are that the perpetrators should have the right to live, but have to face each day with the fact that they killed someone weighing on their conscience. On the other hand, such as with a voluntary murder, the ideas are somewhat similar.
The death penalty is a popular controversial topic throughout the world. Many people believe that it should be used on murderers, rapists, terrorist, arsonists, etc. as retribution and that those convicted deserve the punishment. Those people who are for capital punishment feel that criminals will stop committing such heinous crimes because they know that the result will be death if they are caught. However, the death penalty is proven to not reduce murder rates or any crime rates at all.
The one thing that got me to change my mind was the big amount that are wrongfully accused. Either they were executed, or they got out, but look how much of their lives they lost by being locked up. If we could ensure that every person would be sentenced to death was truly guilty than ok, but this just isn’t the
Capital punishment is one of the most controversial forms of sanction in the United States. The death penalty is legal in 32 states, including California and is outlawed in 18. This subject causes contentious debate amongst people because it allows someone to judge whether or not a person is worthy to live, which some believe is something all-together too powerful to decide. However, others believe it is a powerful tool which will reprimand all menacing criminals, and discourage any future criminals from continuing these offenses. Author Mary Kate Cary, writer of “The Conservative Case Against the Death Penalty,” believes that capital punishment is unnecessary and dangerous because innocent people die, it is discriminatory against people from certain ethnic groups, and believes it is cost effective to let a criminal live rather than be sentenced to death, while author of “The Death Penalty Deters Crimes and Saves Lives,” David B. Muhlhausen thinks that the death penalty should be implemented when certain types of crimes are committed because according to him, it deters future crime, it is not discriminatory, and it saves lives.
The death penalty is inhumane. One could say that the death penalty is inhumane because it takes a person’s life away in the form of revenge. For example, families of victims tend to be upset toward the suspect and want the ultimate revenge which is the death penalty. People have no right to want a murderer to be put to death because it is inhumane to decide another person’s fate and it lowers us to the suspect’s level. One could say that it is understandable where the families of victims are coming form on this issue and others should not judge them for that because the families are acting out of anger, but people have no right to decide if another person lives or dies.
However, many debates are rising between people about whether or not capital punishment is a good thing or a bad thing. Not everyone agrees with the idea of a person being put to death for a crime. One opposing argument for capital punishment is that it is hypocritical and immoral because it does the very thing the government is trying to stop. Another argument is the death penalty can kill innocent people if not fully proven guilty. Finally, the death penalty also denies the sanctity of life; by executing people, the action does not protect their life and, therefore, denies the sanctity of a human being’s right to be alive in the world.
However, many people do not agree with the death penalty due to sympathy for miscreant. Death penalty is very significant in that it relates to the criminal’s life in some cases and has many social impacts. The death penalty should be kept due to criminal’s introspection, deterrence for crime, humanitarianism and money. There is an argument that the death penalty will give no chance for the criminal to introspect. Actually, we will find that the criminal who will receive the death penalty must have many sins, such as treason and first degree murder (Wiki).
Families often call for the death penalty because their sibling/child had no right to die. Since this person took their life, the family should have the right to lawfully take the murder’s life. However, life in prison is not enough, because they have an opportunity to leave on parole, and the thought of these murderous monsters being released into society again horrifies these families, thus they call for execution. On the other side of the spectrum, killing is immoral and wrong in every way shape or form. How does your point get across not to kill if violence is the solution to your problems?