Nathaniel Bacon's Rebellion: A Stand Against Government Corruption

1169 Words3 Pages

Bacon rebellion was an armed rebellion against the rule of Governor Berkeley, it was mainly carried by Virginia settlers. It mainly affected American colonist and Native Americans. Bacon's rebellion was a revolt by farmers, a group of settlers, slaves who were fighting against the government corruption. The revolt was led by young settler Nathaniel bacon in 1676 Virginia, he was from rich family and his cousin was governor. Though William Berkeley and Bacon were related to each other as a family but they did not go very well and often had disagreements with each other. Many people thought that William Berkeley was the main cause of the rebellion. Governor refused whenever bacon went to him for the commission. One major drawback of Governor Berkeley’s policy was that when it came to Native Americans, he wanted to maintain peace and good relations. It was because he did not want to spoil trade relations with them. This was one of the main reason for not allowing commissions to attack them. …show more content…

Many would say that it was the right thing and they deserved to be treated in that way. Native Americans were treated harshly but after bacon rebellion it went higher. Before the rebellion occurred colonists limit the number of land natives could live on, this was because colonist has more land. And on the other side natives would be so far away from then as possible. After the rebellion government started to limit the natives land even more and they were placed in towns by colonial governments. And after that government claimed that it was for the safety purpose but it did not make any difference. Colonist used towns as natives as a defense blockage for safety in case they were attacked by outside forces. On the other side, they were also willing to sacrifice these towns as long as they meant they were

Open Document