What Are The Anomie Theory

1069 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on criminological theories

For response paper number two, I am going to write about several criminological theories. These theories include the anomie, strain, labeling, and social control theories of a crime. Throughout the paper, I will explain what each theory is arguing, while also including its strengths and weaknesses. I will then choose which theory I think explains crime the best. The first theory I will introduce is the anomie theory. This theory challenges biologically based theories by arguing that our internal drives and motives are not impacted in crime, instead crime is motivated by society. Basically, anomie theory eliminates the idea of being born as a criminal based on genetics. To go more in depth, anomie theory suggests that crime is motivated by the “American …show more content…

According to Messner, an important development in the study has been the call for a reconceptualization of the occurrence of poverty. “The notion of poverty has been associated with subsistence levels of economic resources” (Messner, pg. 103). People are poor, when their incomes are so low that they are unable to purchase necessary items for a healthy life. “Poverty from this perspective represents deprivation relative to a fixed standard of physiological well-being leading to the notion” that one must commit crime to survive from poverty (Messner, pg. 103). According to Travis Hirschi, one of its weaknesses stems from its inability to explain conformity to commit crimes. Also, based off of this information, it assumes a common culture in the U.S. that money is the key to life which is definitely not the case for everyone. On the other hand, it can be concluded that the strengths of the anomie theory, specifically Merton’s explanation which states that the theory of anomie has the ability to explain higher crime rates among disadvantaged areas while also explaining how cultural norms create conflict and crime. Furthermore,

Show More
Related

  • General Strain Theory And Agnew's General Strain Theory

    1920 Words  | 4 Pages

    Criminology is a study, which is constantly changing due to the fact that it is based on the political, economic and spiritual concerns of our society. Many theories come to light and then fade away as the societal climate changes. Agnew’s General Strain theory is one the many theories that have been pushed aside; however, it has been remodeled by recent developments in criminology. The general strain theory has defined three major types of strain that may link to the causation of crime. In light of the fact that there are several factors that can motivate a person to commit crime, opportunity is key in the midst of all. Crime Opportunity is another important theory to consider since it exhausts various perspectives in order to determine what provokes people to engage in crime. This meaning, it is impossible for anyone to engage in criminal activity when the odds are unfavorable and there are high risks. While both theories share similarities, Robert Agnew’s general strain theory appears to focus more on the reason behind criminal activity while crime opportunity theory emphasizes on situations of crime.

    Read More

  • Are Criminals Born or Made?

    1900 Words  | 4 Pages

    As the act of criminality is a global phenomenon, there must therefore be some explanation as to why this is; some schools of thought strive to explicate this by means of genetics, whilst others take a more socially influenced approach. Although at the time, the micro-criminological theories of Lombroso and Sheldon may have appeared credible, modern research has attempted to refute such notions. In an epidemiological context, the act of crime is seen by some as a positive contribution to society, as noted by Durkheim (Kirby et al, 2000), although too much will lead to social instability, or anomie. In contrariety to Durkheim's beliefs, a Marxist perspective would consider the mere notion of capitalism as criminal; thus deeming the vast majority of global society to be in a constant state of anomie. However, there is still much dispute as to whether people are born, or made into criminals. This essay will discuss the arguments within this debate. To be ‘born’ criminal indicates a genetic heredity whereas if one is ‘made’; the environmental influences are the significant factor in creation of criminal behaviour.

    Read More

  • Anomie Theory

    1400 Words  | 3 Pages

    The film City of God is based in the slums of Brazil , also called “favelas” where crime and delinquency dominate the neighborhood. The main characters of the film exhibit deviant behaviors in which different theories can be applied to explain their actions. The four theories best used to explain this behavior are concentric zone, social strain, differential association , and social bond theory. The group of characters come from a poor and crime infested neighborhood called the City of God. The characters of discussion are Lil’ Ze, Benny, Rocket, Knockout Ned, and Carrot which are the main players throughout the film. The types of criminal behavior conducted in the neighborhood are theft, murder, drug dealing, and rape.

    Read More

  • Hayes And Prenzler Definition Of Crime Essay

    640 Words  | 2 Pages

    An overview of the idea that psychological and sociological theories can be used in understanding crime.

    Read More

  • Robert Merton's Strain Theory

    594 Words  | 2 Pages

    Drawing upon Merton’s strain theory and Sutherland and Cressey’s theory of differential association, I argue that the combination of these two theories offer a wholesome explanation of why crime happens. Robert Merton’s strain theory (1938) explains the role of social structure in generating anomie (a sense of lawlessness and alienation) in individuals. The theory claims that there are legitimate means of achievement in our quest for success or celebrated goals, which are imposed by social institutions, and the blocking of these pathways leads to the creation of strain. Merton claims that when in strain, people commonly react through conformity, although instances of innovation, ritualism, and retreatism also occur (pp.141). For example, if

    Read More

  • What Is Robert Merton Definition Of Anomie

    135 Words  | 1 Pages

    Robert Merton used the term of anomie, develop by the French sociologist Emile Durkheim in 1951 to explain organized crime. Anomie is refer to a state of normlessness which could be the result of dramatic change such as an economic depression. According to Robert’s theory organized crime is a normal response to the pressure that society put on an individual. As the French visitor Alexis de Tocqueville debates, Americans pursue prosperity but many debate whether or not they took the shortest route to the goal. And according to Merton, for Americans, the goal is emphasized not the mean that is why the doctrine that says the the-end-justifies-the-means is used by many people when they are about to do an illicit act because for many the goal is

    Read More

  • Smith Vs Durkheim

    1101 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many theorists like Karl Marks, Hobbes, and John Locke have proposed theories that help to explain human behavior. Likewise, M.G. Smith and E. Durkheim both sought to explain human behavior by examining the effects that crime has on society. M.G. Smith’s and Durkheim’s writing share similar concepts such as the importance of crime in society. Moreover, both authors acknowledge the fact that society changes. Despite these similarities Smith and Durkheim’s writing contain major differences such as their opinions on how society changes. Both authors also have different viewpoints when it comes to the significance of crime. Despite containing some minor similarities, the differences between M.G. Smiths writing and Durkheim’s are striking.

    Read More

  • The Rational Choice Theory: The Nature Vs. Nurture

    862 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the eternal exploration into understanding the complex criminal mind, a multitude of theories, in the study of criminology, have flourished. Among these theories is the nature vs nurture debate, which suggest that criminal behavior is either genetically inherited or a consequence of environmental influence. These two views on criminal causation differ in many ways but they are not without their similarities.

    Read More

  • Exploring the Quest to Understand Human Behavior and Crime

    1162 Words  | 3 Pages

    First, major causes of crime must be addressed. There are numerous factors that seems to directly effect on crime. The author lists several variables that have incidence on crime; however, they seem to cluster into two categories intrinsic such as impulsivity and extrinsic such as family peers or school (p.2). Furthermore, a well structured theory must encompass the reason why these causes increase the likelihood of crime from different perspective. For example, Strain theorist suggest that child abuse increases the likelihood of crime because it upsets the teenagers, for instance, and as a result the individual will engage in crime activities to either run away from or end the abuse by assaulting their parents or peers, or substance abuse to relieve the pain (p.3). On the other hand, control theorist claim that child abuse increases the chances of crime engagement because it severs the relationship parent-child, and as a result, the child will feel as it has less to lose because a severed bond may implicate lack of value on the parent’s opinion. Additionally, Social Learning theorist sustain that aggression is a learned behavior, and when the child experience abuse learns this behavior and then participates in crime, as a result (p.3). Third, an integral General Theory of Crime addresses the interaction between the causes of crime. In other words, how internal and external causes interact and relate to each other, and if one has effect on the other, or if the effect is reciprocal (p.3). In the same fashion, a good theory must tack on the effect that prior crime has on subsequent ones. For instance, the author expresses that it’s been discusses how committing a crime may directly increase the chances of engaging in crime again, and this may be due to the feeling of instant gratification that

    Read More

  • Robert K. Merton's Theory Of Anomie

    1284 Words  | 3 Pages

    Anomie is a theory that was first introduced in 1983 by the French sociologist ‘Emile Durkheim. His theory would help us to understand why many individuals turn to crime. It mostly concentrated on the lower class but can also be seen in the middle class. Apart from Durkheim, otherwise known as the father of sociology, there are other sociologists who have their own theory of anomie. Robert. K. Merton, an American sociologist, though argued by many that his understanding of anomie is identical to Durkheim’s, he himself insists otherwise. Society hates criminals, but Durkheim believed that crime plays a major part in keeping society balanced. That crime is surrounded by significant circumstances and that it is necessary for the development of ethics and law. However, although he thought crime was necessary, he didn’t suggest that crime is acceptable.

    Read More

  • Labeling Theory And Social Bond Theory

    2374 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout the years criminologists have tried to come up with explanations for what makes individuals more prone to engage in criminal activity. The explanations can range from labels given to individuals to the bonds individuals have with others. Over the years, the theories have been tweaked and integrated to help gain a better understanding of why individuals commit crimes. Some theories also call for explanation on how to reduce crime in the future as well. Everything in society is caused by something, which produces the effect. The cause is generally what goes unknown most of the time. This paper will analyze Labeling Theory and Social Bond Theory. First I will clearly describe

    Read More

  • Anomie Essay

    1892 Words  | 4 Pages

    Durkheim’s and Merton’s use of the term anomie differed in one fundamental way; while Durkheim viewed anomie as the lack of rules to restrain society, Merton viewed anomie as the overregulation inhibiting attainment of culturally accepted goals. These differences stemmed from their different contexts and views on the use of the criminal. However, through the medium of anomie theory, both sociologists have attempted to explain crime through using the social structure of a society. Overall, anomie theory is successful in describing many middle class crimes but fails to explain why senseless crimes occur and why some people undertake crime whilst others

    Read More

  • Super Traits Theory Versus Social Learning Theory

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    Theories are comprehension methods that are used to determine the cause behind criminal activity. The theorists behind these theories help come to a conclusion on the structure of crime, the victims, and the offenders. The two theories addressed are Super Traits Theory and Social Learning Theory. The Super Traits Theory, by Robert Agnew, discusses five concepts (personality, family, school, peers, and work) that could possibly be the start of crime. Agnew argues that personality traits establishes a direct course as to how the other ideas react towards them. Ronald Akers’ Social Learning Theory discusses how people learn criminal behavior from their environment based on operant psychology. Although both Social Learning Theory and Super Traits Theory assists in the determination of crime, the different

    Read More

  • Are Criminals Born or Made?

    2147 Words  | 5 Pages

    Criminals are born not made is the discussion of this essay, it will explore the theories that attempt to explain criminal behaviour. Psychologists have come up with various theories and reasons as to why individuals commit crimes. These theories represent part of the classic psychological debate, nature versus nurture. Are individuals predisposed to becoming a criminal or are they made through their environment.

    Read More

  • Steven Merton's Theory Of Social Structure And Anomie Theory

    2025 Words  | 5 Pages

    They took a macro perspective and looked at what was distinctive about the culture of American society. Returning to the basic concepts of sociology they pointed out that the core components of the social system were culture and social structure. These were central to Merton’s anomie theory, culture being the American Dream and social structure being differential opportunity. Messner and Rosenfeld also highlighted the importance of social institutions (institutional anomie theory). They felt Merton had focused on only one social institution – the economy – ignoring polity, legal systems, educations systems, family, and religion. America’s culture of prioritising wealth interferes with the ability of institutions to socialise individuals into healthy, law abiding roles, everything is secondary to financial success. By examining countries with different levels of decommodification they found that countries with low decommodification scores had high murder rates, this is consistent with institutional anomie theory. If a society is characterised by economic dominance it will have unusually high levels of serious crime. They suggest that if there was less of an emphasis on the economy and the other institutions were given a greater focus, other goals such as family, education, polity and serving the community were encouraged, crime rates could be lowered and

    Read More

More about What Are The Anomie Theory

Open Document