Were The American Colonists Justified Dbq Analysis

895 Words2 Pages

Beginning in 1764 Great Britain started establishing acts on colonies, which would raise the British revenue, ban the colonies from issuing their own paper money or require them to house British troops in their homes. Consequently, it was not long before the colonists started the revolution; the injustices of their mother country finally led them to declare independence and wage war against Great Britain. In my view it is apparent that the colonists were in every right and aspect justified to break away from Britain; moreover, it was just about the time that they stood up and took control over their own fate and life. Significantly, there was a myriad of differences between American colonies and their mother country. The original American …show more content…

As Thomas Whately wrote in his pamphlet (Document 1), British Chancellor of the Exchequer under those circumstances was justified in levying taxes on the colonists. Apparently, the French and Indian War not only caused an increase of the taxes, but also limitation of western expansion by colonists Consequently, it prevented the colonies from settling west of the Appalachian Mountains, where it would be harder to control and tax them. For this reason the colonial resentment of British attempts to expand imperial authority in the colonies …show more content…

Yet soon after it meant that the colonial tea trades were discredited in competing with such an enormous rival, who, besides its treasure, is not obliged to pay taxes. For this reason insulted colonists wage a boycott of British goods and the as a form of a protest the Sons of Liberty dumped 342 chests of tea from Indian company into the harbor; good amounting to $1,000,000 dollars today. Having heard of this, the British Prime Minister Lord North said, "Whatever may be the consequence, we must risk something; if we do not, all is over". The British Parliament responded by a closure of Boston’s harbor and an imposition of Coercive Acts in hope that the acts would cut Boston and the state of New England off from the rest of Americans, which would prevent the British from unified resistance against them. However, the act was viewed as a violation of both; constitution and human or natural rights, leading to a mobilization of the

Open Document