Faith, trust, and pixie dust is what Peter Pan is so well known for. However, every Peter Pan movie remake is different than the original. The story of Peter Pan starts off about the Darling Family, a household of a hard working father, a beautiful mother, three adventurous children, and a dog nurse. However, compared from the Peter Pan made in 1953 and the remake that was produced in 2003, there are quite a few differences, including character personalities, story line changes, and atmosphere changes. Between the two movies, each Peter Pan has a slight change to their personalities, even though they play the same role. In the 1953 film, Peter Pan has a more arrogant personality when it comes to himself. The reason he enjoyed going to see Wendy and the Darlings, was simply because he enjoyed hearing stories about himself and wanted to take Wendy with him to Neverland when he heard that there wouldn’t be any more stories. Peter also tends to love telling stories about himself just as much as he loves hearing …show more content…
Even though both movies had guns and fighting happen, the atmospheres are still different. In 1953, the movie gives off a more happy and lively vibe with the songs and the bright colors of the movie. It also has more of a laughable approach with the characters, making it more enjoyable. As for the 2003 version, it has more of a dark atmosphere at times, as well as more sad moments. It’s also a lot easier to relate to with the characters and grow more of a bond with them because of it. It also has a way of allowing you to feel every emotion there is, rather than just feeling happy. Overall, Peter Pan is a great film and one to really enjoy and appreciate. Even though both films have differences in the characters personalities, story lines, and atmosphere, they are both very enjoyable and bring back childhood memories. After all, what would Peter Pan be without faith, trust, and pixie
In this compare and contrast Fahrenheit 451 book vs movie. My opinion over what the book misses and movie covers and what the movie misses that the book does not miss. The book was published in 1953 vs the movie that was filmed in 1966. I enjoyed the movie better because in the book it is pretty old even though it about the future in today's time it does not really seem futuristic which was confusing reading the book and the movie showed what I did not understand.
Although the two versions were different, they were alike in some ways. For example, the story begins along the shores of lake michigan at sunset towers. Turtle is the winner in the movie and book. Another likeness is the fact that Sam Westing pretends to be four different people. Whether you just read the book or watch the movie, there are many
These movies have things that can be considered accurate due to the data we have from the 1950s while others a far stretch for entertainment. I enjoyed both movies and can see how each could instill panic in people during the time and even to this day.
One of biggest changes occurs in the character Piff. Piff was Polly’s long gone imaginary friend in the Novel who was only talked about, whilst in the Film Piff was still around and living.
For all the differences the film had from the novel, it was basically the same story just told in a more cheerful way and was more about the Joad family. However, the differences did not take away from the film; they might have made the film even better. No matter how different the film was from the novel, they both have succeeded in their own respective fields and remain classics to this
...the two versions have significant differences and very few similarities, but this is understandable due to the two versions being tailored for very contrasting audiences. The Greek gods valued physical strength over love whereas modern society today values love over physical strength which has become an essential element of pop culture. Thus, this evolution serves as the foundation of why Disney had to make alterations to their plot, characters, peripheral details, and the notion of being a true hero. Without such alterations, younger audiences would not be able to relate to the story and therefore, not be able to gain a valuable lesson from it. In addition, these alterations allow for the movie to blend in smoothly with pop culture, where "love" is one of the most abundant aspects of entertainment.
One of the major differences is that the book takes place in the seventeen hundreds in Verona, while the movie takes place in the late twentieth century still in Verona. This difference makes the movie to appear of a rather young intellect due to the fact that the movie uses the same language as the book. It seems out of place.
better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a
In 1904 James Matthew Berrie wrote a book called Peter Pan and Wendy which was adapted into a play by Eric Stedman. Several decades later, it was turned into a Disney classic better known as Walt Disney’s Peter Pan. The movie adaptation was directed by Clyde Geronimi, Wilfred Jackson, and Hamilton Luske and was released in 1953. Even though the film was based off the play, it still has many differences compared to the original play script.
The book is some what different from the movie. There are many differences between the book and the movie. Like when PonyBoy and Johnny went to the movie theater Pony wished that he was big and buff like the guy in the movie. “I was wishing I looked like Paul Newman-he looks tough and I don’t
On the other hand, Cinderella’s perspective of what is going on around her is different in both films. In the older film she has the perspective of her being a maid as a punishment. She believes that her stepmother and stepsisters do not like her and she feels mistreated. While in the new film she has a bigger perspective of her role in the household. When her stepmother and stepsisters first arrive she has a vulnerable and open heart towards them. She goes out her way to make them feel welcomed and loved no matter how much they mistreat
Another difference was the way that Peter and Dr. Ross met. In the novel, Dr. Ross called Peter and invited him to go on an expedition to the Congo with herself and her team. After receiving this call, Peter was begging Dr. Ross to include him on her travels. However, in the movie, Dr. Ross met up with Peter at the airport and Peter was already packed and ready to leave for his own expedition. He had no intention of taking Ross along, but he found himself with insufficient funds to pay for the trip. This pushed Peter to invite Ross along if she was to pay for the remainder of the trip’s expenses.
In the movie, it is told in a third person point of view and the characters look a lot more different than how they do in the book. The movie goes by much quicker than the book. Also Pony goes straight home after the church burns down.
...the 2012 film. And unless you are paying close attention you would completely miss Myrtle Wilson played by Karen Black in the 1974 version and Isla Fisher in the 2013 version besides the party scene in the apartment and her getting killed she is barely noticeable. Jason Clarke played a less wimpy version of George Wilson and he was abusive towards Myrtle. And looked capable of murder and if it wasn’t for the book he would probably flee instead of killing himself. Scott Wilson looked like a sad puppy throughout the movie and very pitiful and it seemed as if Myrtle was abusive towards him. He looked incapable of murder but also as if he would snap at any moment and would commit murder. In the end actors in the 2013 film I would say showed a lot more emotion through and through instead of concealing it and that is something that I enjoyed more than the 1974 version.
When there is a difference in the book Charlie and the Chocolate Factory there is a similarity in the movie “Willy Wonka And The Chocolate Factory”. To begin, the book has many similarities. Like, they have the same three meal gun. Second, the text has the same Chocolate room as the movie. Finally, Charlie is the same in the way he had a poor family.Although in the movie there are many differences. For example, in the film there are different candies like the square candies that look round and the everlasting gobstopper. Also, the movie had the marshmallow pillow room and the movie had a signature room. Finally, the movie had two gifts and the book only had one. This is how the book Charlie And The Chocolate Factory and the movie “Willy Wonka