Well-Regulated Militia Research Paper

456 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: The analyze of Boston Tea Party

The events that took place in the American Revolution inspired the Founding Fathers to establish a Bill of Rights. These men believed that the Second Amendment was there to protect all citizens during the colonization of the New World. The interpretation of the phrase “a well regulated Militia” is essential when trying understanding the issues the founders were facing during the Revolutionary Era. Great Britain’s colonization of the New World was motivated by power and money. Consequently, this directly affected American citizens in almost every aspect of their daily lives. Tensions arose as Americans felt that they were being forced to conform to Britain’s political, social and cultural views. As Enlightenment spread, America began to view their relationship with the government very differently. Soon after, British Parliament decided to pass the Stamp Act without a single American representative’s consent. This caused for major upheaval, and in retaliation the Sons of Liberty were formed to protest against the British. Shortly after, violent events emerged like the Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party that sparked one of the most memorable revolutions. The horrific protests that took place during the Revolution, helped influence the Founding Fathers decision to add the Bill of Rights to the Constitution. …show more content…

It is imperative that the role of a militia is clearly understood because these men protect not just the people but also the government. This statement reveals that the United States Constitution entrusted militias and what they stood for in their protection of the

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of 'The Armed Citizen In The Early Republic' By Robert E. Shalhope

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    Cress argues that the right to bear arms should be given only to organized militia groups. However, it was clear that the Founding Fathers made no distinction between the militia and the people. The Second Amendment allows individuals to own guns and to be able to protect themselves. If the Founding Fathers wanted gun ownership to be for militias only, they would have specifically stated that in the Second Amendment. Cress ineffectively argues that the militias were an important part of protecting the people when in reality they were not well-trained and may not have been committed to the cause which rendered them ineffective. Therefore, Cress’ argument is not reflective of the attitudes of the Founding

    Read More

  • Were The Colonists Justified To Rebel?

    884 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the mid eighteenth century colonist of the new world started to rebel against Britain. Living in the colonies cost Britain a great deal of money Colonist did not like that they were being taxed. There were several acts passed that angered the colonists. For example, the Stamp Act, the Stamp Act was passed in 1765 taxed all legal documents including newspapers and other printed materials. The Stamp Act affected all that bought printed materials and it did not affect the poor because it was not too expensive. The colonist started to rebel and boycotted “No taxation without representation.” The colonists rebelled in many ways one of them was the Boston Tea Party. The Boston Tea Party occurred in 1773 as an act of revolt colonists threw tea cargo of a ship to the ocean. These acts of Britain towards the new colonies caused colonist to revolve and declare war to separate from Britain. The colonists were not justified to going to war to break away from Britain because England was paying more taxes and the mother country deserved absolute respect; however, the colonists were justified to break away from Britain because they were taxed without representation.

    Read More

  • Did the American Revolution Follow the Broad Pattern of Revolutions?

    1617 Words  | 4 Pages

    As a prelude before the Revolution itself, there were already preliminary symptoms of unrest within America that followed the first step in the general pattern of revolutions. Prior to the first shots at Lexington and Concord in 1775, growing discontent with the British Government passing certain acts that the Americans perceived as unfair had already risen to a substantial degree. With the majority of acts incurring economic and financial costs, by 1767, the Townshend Acts had been passed, putting further taxes on paper, glass and tea. Upon the taxes that the Stamp Act of 1965 incurred on such items as newspapers, official documents and almanacs, the American people became highly agitated and a feeling of resentment quickly spilled over the masses, ‘several person were for dying rather than submitting to it...’ [pg52 Maier, P.] Additionally, the Colonialist became increasingly violent, ‘Almost immediately after the Acts [implementation], outbreak of mob activity...’[pg54 Maier, P.] By 1970, the preliminary symptom of unrest displayed through protest and discontent was evident. The Colonialist did not feel that they were obligated to be subject to these taxes without representation in British Parliament. Additionally, the psychological pre-condition associated with the cause of war was present in the Colonialist discontent regarding the numerous Acts bearing economic consequences. Not only had the events up till 1770 displayed active protests and early mob activity, it also hinted at the potential oncoming violence the growing mob could inflict which was the next step in the general broad pattern of revolutions.

    Read More

  • The Enlighment and the Great Awakening Influence on the American Revolution

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...Sugar and Stamp Acts). Before the era of Enlightenment, colonists were angered by the British interfering with their new country, but never thought to rebel against their homeland. However, with their newfound knowledge of Enlightenment principles like freedom and reason, many colonists began to see the taxes as unfair. Knowing that political power was in their hands, they stood up against the British government stating that they were an independent country. Additionally, as the British government continued to try to interfere with American government, many colonists began to want a new government that was based on Enlightenment principles instead. This led to the American Revolution because the colonists with their gained knowledge of the world and society yearned for a government that guaranteed everyone natural rights under the law.

    Read More

  • A Well Regulated Militia by Saul Cornell

    1491 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over all, A Well Regulated Militia is a book that provided us great details on how was the Second Amendment was influencing gun control early America. Our Founding Fathers made a right decision to create the Second Amendment to give more benefits for American citizens, but in the 21st century, many crimes abused the Second Amendment as a reason for them to break the laws. Congress needs to step up and take action on guns control to stop more tragedies that involves guns in the future like in The Dark Knight Rises movie massacre.

    Read More

  • Gun Ownership and the Second Amendment of the Constitution

    1611 Words  | 4 Pages

    "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

    Read More

  • First Continental Congress

    1440 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Intolerable Acts of 1774 greatly fueled the First Continental Congress. In response to the Boston Tea party, the British Parliament decided that a series of laws were needed to calm the rising resistance in America. “One law closed Boston Harbor until Bostonians paid for the destroyed tea. Another law restricted the activities of the Massachusetts legislature and gave added powers to the post of governor of Massachusetts.” As one can imagine, the American colonist viewed this as the British attempt to curtail their quest for independence.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Violates The Second Amendment of the Constitution

    977 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Second Amendment to the Bill of rights of the United States Constitution states "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." In order to understand that right, the modern reader must understand the semantics of the eighteenth century. The term "Well Regulated" meant well trained according to James Madison, the principle author of the Constitution. The term militia, according to the Militia Act of 1792, referred to all able-bodied male citizens. The meaning then of the Second Amendment is made quite clear. It is meant to serve as a chain upon the government to prevent the infringement of government power upon the Civil Liberties of Americans. Further proof of this can be seen in a quote from George Madison. "I ask, Sir, What is the Militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials." (George Madison, Three Elliot, Debates at 425-426). Richard Henry Lee, in his Additional Letters from the Federal Farmer of 1788 stated, "A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves.and include all men capable of bearing arms." Title Ten section 331 of the U.S. code states "The Militia of the United States consists of all able bodied men at least seventeen years of age."

    Read More

  • Gun Ownership in Early America

    761 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the article “Gun Ownership in Early America: A Survey of Manuscript Militia Returns” by Robert Churchill, he discusses how gun ownership in the early 18th and 19th centuries was scarce and at times the armed militias were the only people who had guns at all. It was because of this that the government made gun ownership exceptional. This is different from today when gun ownership is everywhere. Due to the high concentration of guns sometimes it is hard to count how many are sold in the United States every year. To learn that guns, at one time, were almost non-existent is almost hard to believe.

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms

    2184 Words  | 5 Pages

    A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (Amendment II 1791)

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: American Have the Right To Bear Arms

    1502 Words  | 4 Pages

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Amendment II

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment of the Constitution

    503 Words  | 2 Pages

    “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

    Read More

  • Prefatory Clauses Of The Second Amendment

    1057 Words  | 3 Pages

    “A well-regulated militia” is stated in the prefatory clause. In United States v Miller, it was explained that “the Militia comprised of all males physically capable of acting in concert for a common defense.” “The right of the people to keep and bear arms” is a part of the operative clause. This statement recognizes that the second amendment is exercised individually and belongs to all Americans. The second half of that statement, “keep and bear arms” addresses what right the people have. It referred to weapons that were not specifically designed for military use and were not employed in a military capacity. The connection between the two shows the original reason for the creation of the second amendment, and then what that right is. “A well-regulated militia” demonstrates the original reason for the creation of the second amendment which was to protect the states from potential infringement of the federal government. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms” therefore demonstrates that the right of the people that cannot be infringed on by the federal government is the ability of the citizens to have and use

    Read More

  • The Right to Bear Arms

    1317 Words  | 3 Pages

    The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in the Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation or individuals.

    Read More

  • Guns and Violence

    604 Words  | 2 Pages

    When our forefathers sat down to write the bill of rights they made ten basic rules or freedoms that all Americans are entitled to. For hundreds of years no one has questioned any of those freedoms, that is until recent years. The second amendment gives Americans the right to bear arms. The purpose of this amendment is to be able to form a militia in order to be able to overthrow a repressive government. In recent years the availability and number of guns in the United States has increased. With the media tracking and recording violence, some Americans have begun to question the 2nd amendment’s relevance.

    Read More

More about Well-Regulated Militia Research Paper

Open Document