Wellbeing and its Benefits
Wellbeing’, ‘life satisfaction’ and ‘quality of life’ are often used interchangeably, and incorporate both objective and subjective aspects of a person’s life – both observable facts (such as household income, family structure, educational achievement, health status) and an individual’s own feelings about these things and their life in general.
The benefits of well being
It is the right of any individual to be well physically, mentally, socially, emotionally, family-wise and even spiritually. Often time, this is not as easy as one might think as it requires a great deal of knowledge and wisdom for living. I have seen wealthy people striving to be healthy, and would be ready to pay for them to be restored back to a perfect health as they can afford anything. However, this is not always a fulfilled desire. Sometimes to remain healthy, may require enforcement and re-enforcement as described in the
…show more content…
This is the acknowledgment that quality of life/well-being has both objective components which are the components external to an individual and measurable by ‘others’ and subjective components which are personal assessments of one’s own life or of particular aspects of life using measures of satisfaction, happiness, or other self-assessment scales.
Many risk factors associated with preventable diseases that affect the physical bodies are prevalently rising as a result of modern lifestyles. The current system focusses more on financial income, success, jobs, and technology at the expense of intensive focus on wellbeing. The current lifestyles are embedded with modifiable risks, but a lot of efforts are still required. These risks can include tobacco usage, nutrition, and diet, alcohol consumption and exercise. As a result of which there is a tendency towards developing health
Levels and definitions of subjective wellbeing differ from person to person, country to country and from culture to culture. It is extremely hard to pinpoint how many and what demographic factors influence subjective wellbeing across the general population as a whole. Though we cannot, given these differences, confirm how much and to what extent our subjective wellbeing is determined by biological factors, we can deduce that a portion is built due to external, non-genetic
Over the last several years, the United States has experienced the emergence of countless lifestyle based illnesses. We have seen an increase of inactivity, poor nutrition, an increase of tobacco use, and more frequent alcohol consumption; Americans are living unhealthy lifestyles that are surely factors contributing to the pervasiveness of chronic diseases. Chronic diseases use to be seen as problems that older generations faced, but over the past several years the United States’ working age group has become a main target. For example, Americans are experiencing higher rates of diabetes, and heart disease. Conditions like these only lead to a diminished quality of life, could possibly lead to shorter life spans, disability, and quite possibly in the long run increased health care costs. Businesses are also impacted by an employees lifestyle decisions; absenteeism and presenteeism.
...l being are holistic. Well being is not compartmentalised in the way that it has been articulated in Western positivist science. There are similarities with Strengths based, Recovery-focused, constructivist and ecological perspectives.
Wellbeing was first discussed as authentic happiness by Seligman. In the concept of authentic happiness he discussed the components of positive emotions, meaning in life and engagement. He had described these components to be very much essential in bringing in authentic happiness which he called as wellbeing. It takes the shape of subjective wellbeing, when it becomes subjective to a person’s experience alone. The concrete aspects of health and wealth may stay away from this, when a person’s subjectivity is concerned (Kammann, 1983). Over the years as we see in other studies, this concept has changed to subjective wellbeing being defined on the basis of all the areas of life, wherein the objective factors of wealth and health, and
Inside of the book The Best Things in Life: A Guide to What Really Matters, by Thomas Hurka, there are three major theories of the good life and well-being. These include Ethical Hedonism, Desire Satisfaction Theory, and Objectivism. Ethical Hedonisms stance is that something is intrinsically good for you if and only if it is a state of pleasure. Your well-being improves when and only when you experience pleasure. Desire Satisfaction Theory has a few more layers to it. There are four different versions. All of them have to deal with satisfying something that is intrinsically good for you, they just vary based on what kinds of desires are being satisfied, if you wanted it at the time the desire was achieved, who the desires pertains to, and
The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) was developed as a measure of subjective, overall wellbeing. The SWLS draws on existing understandings of subjective wellbeing, and the scale has been specifically designed to measure the cognitive evaluation of satisfaction. It was established from 48 self-reported statements, including items regarding life satisfaction, and positive and negative affect. Through factor analysis, researchers were able to detect these three factors, and remove the items that corresponded to the affect components, leaving ten statements, which were reduced to five to account for similarities in wording. It claims to allow respondents to cognitively evaluate multiple domains of life they may value, and for them to independently weigh these during response. This measure differs from past measures of subjective wellbeing with existing assessment commonly measuring affect (positive and or negative) and emotion, and not overall life satisfaction (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin,
Public health is a concept that will always be subject to conflicting opinion. Over the year’s different ‘models’ of health have been formulated in order to categorise public health into dominant areas of cause and effect. The two models in which this essay will be focusing on are the Biomedical Model and the Lifestyle Theory Model. Although both models have equally arguable advantages and disadvantages, it is difficult to state either model as being ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ in defining the correct pathway to resolving the central health issues of today.
According to Freud’s conclusion based on decades of experimentation and theoretical work in the field of psychotherapy, humans cannot be happy because a satisfaction of needs creates only a momentary phase of happiness which expires after some time. Therefore, the focus of life should not be obtaining happiness, and people should focus on avoiding suffering instead (Bullock, n.d.). However, several paradigms about well-being exist, and individual cognitive patterns and paradigms define the emotional responses to social influences. From an objective viewpoint, well-being is a state of consciousness that arises from a combination of internal and external factors, and money is an unstable external influence in defining subjective well-being.
happiness is found by living in accordance with human dignity, which is a life in accordance
Adoration of God; solidarity with a definitive; turning into one with the universe; concordance of body, psyche, soul, and nature; these expressions point to the key objectives of the significant religious customs. The objectives mentioned speak to wellbeing in the most important sense (Meier, O 'Connor & VanKatwyk, 2005). They can be accomplished through a relationship between the broad sense of being of the individual and the group. Religious groups perceive human enduring, disorder, and social unfairness as issues identified with human detachment from an extreme reality and disharmony in the middle of self and world. Cures may include religiously based treatment practices, reflection, a request to God, physical controls like hatha yoga,
Well-being is a combination of physical, mental, emotional and social factors. It is seen, as a stable state of being satisfied with one’s self and their life that doesn’t fluctuate due to a single even, person, or feeling (Begley and Begun, 2000). Well-being consists of eight dimensions, emotional, environmental, financial, intellectual, occupational, physical, social and spiritual (Begley and Begun, 2000). For the purpose of this study we are going to be looking at the emotional and occupational sides of well-being. Emotional state of well being is the ability to recognize, understand and express a full range of emotions and channel our emotions into healthy behaviours that satisfy our personal and social goals (Ryff, 1985). Occupational is achieving personal satisfaction and enrichment in one’s life through work, education, and personal goals and passions (Ryff, 1985).
In the Oxford English dictionary the definition of wellbeing is “a state of being healthy, happy or prosperous; physical, psychological and moral welfare.” In correlation with KE 206 module, wellbeing is indeed all these things but also how they shape and influence the lives of children and young people. The wellbeing of children and young people can be understood objectively and subjectively. Objectively, the wellbeing of children and young people can be understood by looking at and measuring basic needs in life food shelter and safety. The wellbeing of children and young people can be understood subjectively by asking how one perceives themselves, their own wellbeing and emotions. In general, wellbeing is also affected by external factors
The quality of life is assumed by an individual's way of life. “Quality of life is all about and finding a happy balance between work and friends and family” (Philip Green). It can destroy one’s way of thought, or even be a complimenting type of environment. Demonstrated in the short story the Japanese Quince, life a be hard to discover and achieve. Wanting to change to pursue a new humanity, can be a challenge goal to step forward with.
The next perception supporting happiness understand that we are successful human beings. Self-sufficiency is the other aspect that plays a role in the conclusion of pure happiness. People tend to feel a sensation of power when they realize that they are not under anyone’s control. That is why we tend to despise situations in which we do not receive the satisfactory freedom to act in addition to showing emotional reaction. It is the nature to engage in different actions contrary to the expected. Thus, the desire for independence is like possessions and mastery is a weird wonder evident even in young
The last two measures Stable satisfaction and Positive Satisfaction have total of 10 questions that are originated from the something to live for and life satisfaction (SLLS) scale. These questions are graded on a 4-point scale, which 1 being ‘not at all’ and 4 being ‘very much.’ Through these two measures, the score reflects the well being of the individual; higher score means higher satisfaction of life.