The water quality in the UHS creek was identified as excellent in the last lab report the was purposed on finding the quality of water. But some creeks or other bodies of water are not as clean as the UHS creek. This is mostly caused humans that negatively impact the water causing the quality to deteriorate. One way humans can negatively impact water quality is by famers putting fertilizers and pesticides on their crops. The chemicals can be washed off by rain and can run into rivers. This in turn causes algae to overgrow in the river (called eutrophication), this turns that water green. When all of this algae dies bacteria break them up using all of the oxygen in the river killing all of the other organisms (http://www.lenntech.com/rivers-pollution-quality.htm). …show more content…
A riparian zone would be an area surrounding and aquatic area like a creek (around 25 feet on each side). This area would be a transition from the aquatic environment to the terrestrial environment of everything around the creek. It would left alone and not be interfered with by human activities such as mowing or spraying pesticides on them. Any trash would be removed from the zone and signs would be put up around the area to let people be aware of the zone. All of this would allow for natural growth of plants and other organisms in the environment surrounding the creek. One pro of this idea would be that all of the plants would filter storm runoff and remove some pollutants before they reach the water. Another pro would be that all of the new environment would protect the bank from being eroded as severely as before. On the other side one con would be that it may take up a lot of space that would be hard to be kept natural and untouched. Another con would be that it may be too pricey for the government or organization that would start this area and make to maintain it and enforce the rules, leading to it not working.
Conservation banking was modeled after the U.S. wetland mitigation banking system and the two programs share many similarities. However, unlike the wetland mitigation system, conservation offsets do not have a stated ‘no net loss’ goal, but instead have a species recovery goal. Both conservation and wetlands mitigation banks are privately or publicly owned lands which are protected and managed for its ecological value. By doing this, the bank sponsor generates habitat or wetland or stream credits to sell to developers or transportation departments who need to offset their impacts and comply with the legal requirements for the permitting of development or roadway projects. Both types of banks offer benefits to both the landowner that owns the natural resource and the developer that needs to purchase the credits. The landowner can take portions of their property that may have been considered unusable and turn it into an asset. The developer can streamline their permitting process by purchasing credits instead of implementing a mitigation plan themselves.
The purpose of the experiment is to determine the ID of an unknown diprotic acid by establishing its pKa values. The first phase is to determine the unknown diprotic acid by titration, which is a technique where a solution of known concentration is used to determine the molecular weight. While the second phase involved seeing how much NaOH needed to standardize diprotic acid.
We did an experiment to see if the Conodoguinet Creek is polluted. Through our testing, we found that the water is not very polluted. We conducted many different types of tests to come to this conclusion. A few of the tests that we conducted were alkalinity, phosphate, dissolved oxygen, nitrate, and discovering creatures in different groups. We looked at the different macroinvertebrates that live in the water. Also, we tested the velocity of the surface water. The Conodoguinet Creek is located in Cumberland County, and is 101 miles long. The Conodoguinet Creek flows into the Susquehanna river.
The experiment is aimed at giving a better understatement of osmosis process and the different conditions in which osmosis occurs.
There are many causes and solutions to the deterioration of the Colorado River. The Colorado River is not the great river it used to be, with an abundant amount of healthy water, thriving wildlife and abundant plant life. With climate change, water salinity, pollution, and natural runoffs, the river’s water quality has deteriorated immensely. However, if communities and environmental groups join forces to research and raise money to find ways to help improve the Colorado River, it can get back to its original condition. This issues affects those who live by the river, concluding that I live somewhere near the river, I would love to see a change in the rivers condition to not only help the nature around it, but to help myself and others.
About 80% of the State’s surveyed freshwater rivers and streams have good water quality that fully supports aquatic life uses, 17% have fair water quality that partially supports aquatic life uses, and 3% have poor water quality that does not support aquatic life uses. Ten percent of the surveyed rivers do not fully support swimming. The major sources of impairment are agriculture (responsible for 53% of the impaired river miles), urban runoff (responsible for 16%), and construction (responsible for 13%). These sources generate siltation, bacteria, and organic wastes that deplete disssolved opxygen.
Such is the condition of Texas waterways. The surging population in Texas, the numerous pharma, chemical and oil industries, landowners, farmers and other residents have been recklessly using water. Water is a limited resource and our best efforts in recycling, reusing and conserving water have not yielded the desired results. Climatic changes over the past few decades may have resulted in unpredictable rainfall in Texas. It is important to conserve water without polluting it. It is shocking to know that the drinking water has traces of arsenic, cyanide, nitrates, asbestos and mercury and lead. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Geological Survey after conducting studies have shown that water samples containing growth hormones, various antibiotics,birth control drugs, and many other chemicals end up in ground water. The Trinity River is highly polluted with bacteria from sewage. The high water pollution in Texas State by various sources causes environmental hazards and life threatening diseases like cancer and nerve damage; thus the government and community should intensify their efforts to reduce pollution and make drinking water safe.
Three Medical Doctors wrote the book, The Water We Drink: Water Quality and Its Effects on Health. Their names are Joshua I. Barzilay, M.D., Winkler G. Weinberg, M.D., and J. William Eley, M.D. In order to put the issue of drinking water quality and its effects on health into perspective, the book is divided into three parts. It first reviews the history of water, disease, and sanitation. The next section deals with health issues. At the conclusion of the book are chapters regarding bottled water and methods of purification. The intent of the book is to educate consumers.
I will be writing my research paper on the subject of “Water Quality in Your State” which is Nevada with a concentration on the water quality in the Las Vegas region. I will present the importance of water, its source in Nevada, the pros and con on the water quality in the state of Nevada and analyze both sides in detail. The quality of water in Nevada is a very important subject. All life on planet Earth has some connection to water. Whether it being drinking water for survival, eating animals who depend on water, or using water in some way to grow. All life on this planet has some connection to it.
The park in which the pond water was gathered is in an urban area in providence Rhode Island. The current state of the park is slightly polluted with people traveling through it every day. Common activities in the park can be, but are not limited to, walking, running, or driving through the park, swimming, boating, or fishing in the water, or feeding the numerous amount of wildlife throughout the park. It is assumed that all of these activities affect the ecosystem negatively. A lab was conducted to study the very effects that humans have on this quant ecosystem. Two large buckets of pond water were gathered to the site of the lab. The individuals then studied the life in the buckets that could be easily sought out, such as, large snails, frogs, and even a fish. These organisms were sketched and noted. Then the individuals took out microscopes to view micro organisms in the pond. These organisms were so tiny the individuals couldn't see them with the naked eye. A lot of macroinvertebrates and algae were discovered and noted at this point. In the end, about 28 organisms were found in total and compiled into a large chart. This chart was then used to create a trophic level pyramid (a
The hydrologic effects of urban development often are greatest in small stream basins where, prior to development, much of the precipitation falling on the basin would have become subsurface flow, recharging aquifers or discharging to the stream network further downstream. Moreover, urban development can completely transform the landscape in a small stream basin, unlike in larger river basins where areas with natural vegetation and soil are likely to be
Water quality can be described as the measurement of the condition of water relative to the requirements of humans, animals and plant’s need. When we talk about water quality testing, we are highlighting a critical piece of natural observing for civil engineers in order to create a specific structure or decision. At the point when water quality is poor, it influences almost every single form of life in our planet; going from plants to animals and thereon. Hydrology, in the other hand, is the study of water. It is important to state that hydrology is a critical part for civil engineers to determine and predicting decisions that will affect our biological environment.
Clearing of land for cultivation may cause soil erosion which results. in large quantities of sediments being moved into channels and floodplains.
Most people think they know a wetland when they see one, but the delineation of wetlands for the purpose of granting permits has proven enormously controversial. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), an area is defined as a wetland when a combination of three technical criteria are met: Wetland hydrology (land that is saturated within 18 inches of the surface for more than seven days per year), Hydrophytic vegetation (a list of plants that will thrive in wet areas), and Hydric soil (mucky and peat-based soil). The continual destruction of these valuable lands is due mainly to farmers, oil and mining interests, and development groups (Russel, p.36). It is estimated that 30-40% of the original wetlands in the United States have been lost, and about 300-400,000 acres are destroyed each year (Hollis, p. 36). Recent concern has led to an increase in wetland restoration and creation to reduce the impacts of activities in or near wetlands, compensate for additional losses, and to restore or replace wetlands already degraded or destroyed (Nicholas, p. 39).